• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用API 20E系统和Crystal E/NF系统对人和动物源革兰氏阴性菌进行鉴定的比较。

Comparison of identifications of human and animal source gram-negative bacteria by API 20E and crystal E/NF systems.

作者信息

Peele D, Bradfield J, Pryor W, Vore S

机构信息

Department of Comparative Medicine, East Carolina University School of Medicine, Greenville, North Carolina 27858, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Jan;35(1):213-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.1.213-216.1997.

DOI:10.1128/jcm.35.1.213-216.1997
PMID:8968910
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC229541/
Abstract

This study compared the abilities of API 20E and BBL Crystal E/NF identification systems to correctly identify human and animal source gram-negative bacilli of known identifications, as provided by the American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, Md., and the Research Diagnostic and Investigative Laboratory, Columbia, Mo. Also addressed in the comparison are the cost, the relative ease of performing and interpreting the tests, and the potential problems surrounding each system. The two systems were comparable in terms of their respective costs and abilities to identify the bacteria tested. The cost per test was calculated as $4.69 for API 20E and $4.62 for Crystal E/NF. Of the animal source bacteria tested, Crystal E/NF identified 68% to the correct genus and species and 90% to the correct genus or group. The remaining 10% of the animal source bacteria were unidentified by Crystal. Human source bacteria tested by BBL Crystal E/NF gave very similar results: 47% correctly identified to genus and species, 90% correctly identified to genus or group, 7% unidentified, and 3% incorrectly identified. API 20E results were as follows for animal source bacteria: 53% correctly identified to genus and species, 76% correctly identified to genus or group, and 24% unidentified; the results for human source bacteria were as follows: 40% correctly identified to genus and species, 83% correctly identified to genus or group, and 17% unidentified. API 20E has a slightly more labor-intensive protocol for setting up the test than BBL Crystal E/NF but produced fewer questionable results.

摘要

本研究比较了API 20E鉴定系统和BBL Crystal E/NF鉴定系统对已知鉴定结果的人源和动物源革兰氏阴性杆菌的正确鉴定能力,这些菌株由位于马里兰州罗克维尔的美国模式培养物集存库以及位于密苏里州哥伦比亚的研究诊断与调查实验室提供。比较内容还包括成本、进行和解释测试的相对难易程度以及每个系统周围潜在的问题。在各自成本和鉴定所测试细菌的能力方面,这两个系统具有可比性。API 20E每次测试的成本计算为4.69美元,Crystal E/NF为4.62美元。在测试的动物源细菌中,Crystal E/NF将68%鉴定到正确的属和种,90%鉴定到正确的属或类群。Crystal未鉴定出其余10%的动物源细菌。BBL Crystal E/NF测试的人源细菌给出了非常相似的结果:47%正确鉴定到属和种,90%正确鉴定到属或类群,7%未鉴定,3%鉴定错误。API 20E对动物源细菌的结果如下:53%正确鉴定到属和种,76%正确鉴定到属或类群,24%未鉴定;对人源细菌的结果如下:40%正确鉴定到属和种,83%正确鉴定到属或类群,17%未鉴定。与BBL Crystal E/NF相比,API 20E设置测试的方案稍微更耗费人力,但产生的可疑结果较少。

相似文献

1
Comparison of identifications of human and animal source gram-negative bacteria by API 20E and crystal E/NF systems.采用API 20E系统和Crystal E/NF系统对人和动物源革兰氏阴性菌进行鉴定的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Jan;35(1):213-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.1.213-216.1997.
2
Evaluation of a new identification system, Crystal Enteric/Non-Fermenter, for gram-negative bacilli.一种新型革兰氏阴性杆菌鉴定系统——Crystal肠道菌/非发酵菌鉴定系统的评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Apr;33(4):845-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.4.845-849.1995.
3
Comparison of Crystal Enteric/Nonfermenter system, API 20E system, and Vitek AutoMicrobic system for identification of gram-negative bacilli.用于鉴定革兰氏阴性杆菌的晶体肠杆菌/非发酵菌系统、API 20E系统和Vitek自动微生物鉴定系统的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Feb;33(2):364-70. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.2.364-370.1995.
4
Parallel comparison of accuracy of API 20E, Vitek GNI, MicroScan Walk/Away Rapid ID, and Becton Dickinson Cobas Micro ID-E/NF for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and common gram-negative, non-glucose-fermenting bacilli.对API 20E、Vitek GNI、MicroScan Walk/Away Rapid ID和Becton Dickinson Cobas Micro ID-E/NF用于鉴定肠杆菌科成员及常见革兰氏阴性、非葡萄糖发酵杆菌的准确性进行平行比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Dec;31(12):3165-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.12.3165-3169.1993.
5
Comparison of BBL Crystal ANR ID Kit and API rapid ID 32 A for identification of anaerobic bacteria.用于鉴定厌氧菌的BBL Crystal ANR ID试剂盒与API快速鉴定32A的比较
Zentralbl Bakteriol. 1996 Jul;284(2-3):329-47. doi: 10.1016/s0934-8840(96)80109-5.
6
Evaluation of the new Vitek 2 GN card for the identification of gram-negative bacilli frequently encountered in clinical laboratories.新型Vitek 2 GN卡用于鉴定临床实验室常见革兰氏阴性杆菌的评估。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2005 Oct;24(10):671-6. doi: 10.1007/s10096-005-0026-6.
7
Comparison of the API 20E and BBL Crystal E/NF identification systems for differentiating bacterial isolates from apparently healthy reared sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax).比较API 20E和BBL Crystal E/NF鉴定系统对从明显健康养殖的海鲈(欧洲鲈)中分离出的细菌进行鉴别。
Vet Res Commun. 2004 Feb;28(2):93-101. doi: 10.1023/b:verc.0000012113.95479.2f.
8
Evaluation of Vitek GNI+ and Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems Crystal E/NF identification systems for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and other gram-negative, glucose-fermenting and non-glucose-fermenting bacilli.评估Vitek GNI+和贝克顿·迪金森微生物系统Crystal E/NF鉴定系统对肠杆菌科成员及其他革兰氏阴性、葡萄糖发酵和非葡萄糖发酵杆菌的鉴定能力。
J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Dec;35(12):3269-73. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.12.3269-3273.1997.
9
[Evaluation of API 20 NE (version 6.0) in rare Gram-negative non-glucose-fermenting bacilli].[API 20 NE(第6.0版)在罕见革兰氏阴性非葡萄糖发酵杆菌中的评估]
Rev Argent Microbiol. 2003 Jul-Sep;35(3):133-7.
10
Accuracy of six commercially available systems for identification of members of the family vibrionaceae.六种市售系统用于鉴定弧菌科成员的准确性。
J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Dec;41(12):5654-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.12.5654-5659.2003.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances in diagnosis of diseases causing diarrhea in newborn calves.新生犊牛腹泻病因诊断的进展
Vet Res Commun. 2025 Aug 28;49(5):293. doi: 10.1007/s11259-025-10855-0.
2
A multiplexed, indirect enzyme-linked immunoassay for the detection and differentiation of E. coli from other Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa from other glucose non-fermenters.一种多重间接酶联免疫吸附试验,用于检测和区分大肠杆菌与其他肠杆菌科以及铜绿假单胞菌与其他非发酵葡萄糖菌。
J Microbiol Methods. 2019 Mar;158:52-58. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2019.01.014. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
3
Salmonella, Shigella, and yersinia.沙门氏菌、志贺氏菌和耶尔森氏菌。
Clin Lab Med. 2015 Jun;35(2):225-46. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2015.02.002. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
4
A review approaches to identify enteric bacterial pathogens.一篇关于鉴定肠道细菌病原体方法的综述。
Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2014 Dec 10;8(2):e17473. doi: 10.5812/jjm.17473. eCollection 2015 Feb.
5
Comparative evaluation of automated reading versus visual interpretation with the BBL Crystal enteric/nonfermenter identification system in a clinical setting.在临床环境中使用BBL Crystal肠道/非发酵菌鉴定系统对自动读数与目视判读进行比较评估。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007 Jun;26(6):443-4. doi: 10.1007/s10096-007-0317-1.
6
Comparison of API 20E and invA PCR for identification of Salmonella enterica isolates from swine production units.用于鉴定来自养猪场的肠炎沙门氏菌分离株的API 20E和invA聚合酶链反应比较
J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Sep;44(9):3388-90. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00972-06.
7
Faecal coliform bacteria in Febros river (northwest Portugal): temporal variation, correlation with water parameters, and species identification.费布罗斯河(葡萄牙西北部)中的粪大肠菌群:时间变化、与水质参数的相关性及菌种鉴定
Environ Monit Assess. 2006 Jul;118(1-3):21-36. doi: 10.1007/s10661-006-0771-8.
8
Comparison of the API 20E and BBL Crystal E/NF identification systems for differentiating bacterial isolates from apparently healthy reared sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax).比较API 20E和BBL Crystal E/NF鉴定系统对从明显健康养殖的海鲈(欧洲鲈)中分离出的细菌进行鉴别。
Vet Res Commun. 2004 Feb;28(2):93-101. doi: 10.1023/b:verc.0000012113.95479.2f.
9
Evaluation of two miniaturized systems, MicroScan W/A and BBL Crystal E/NF, for identification of clinical isolates of Aeromonas spp.评估两种小型系统,即MicroScan W/A和BBL Crystal E/NF,用于鉴定气单胞菌属临床分离株。
J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Dec;41(12):5732-4. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.12.5732-5734.2003.
10
Pulmonary hypertension syndrome in broilers caused by Enterococcus faecalis.粪肠球菌引起的肉鸡肺动脉高压综合征
Infect Immun. 2001 Oct;69(10):6318-22. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.10.6318-6322.2001.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of two BBL Crystal systems for identification of some clinically important gram-negative bacteria.评估两种BBL Crystal系统用于鉴定某些临床重要革兰氏阴性菌的效果。
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Sep;32(9):2221-4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.9.2221-2224.1994.
2
Comparison of Crystal Enteric/Nonfermenter system, API 20E system, and Vitek AutoMicrobic system for identification of gram-negative bacilli.用于鉴定革兰氏阴性杆菌的晶体肠杆菌/非发酵菌系统、API 20E系统和Vitek自动微生物鉴定系统的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Feb;33(2):364-70. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.2.364-370.1995.
3
Reevaluation of the API 20E identification system versus conventional biochemicals for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae: a new look at an old product.API 20E鉴定系统与传统生化方法用于肠杆菌科细菌鉴定的重新评估:对一种旧产品的新审视。
J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Jan;30(1):123-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.1.123-125.1992.