Navarro E E, Almario J S, Schaufele R L, Bacher J, Walsh T J
Immunocompromised Host Section, Pediatric Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Dec;35(12):3292-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.12.3292-3297.1997.
The significance of quantitative urine cultures in patients at risk for hematogenous disseminated candidiasis is controversial. While various concentrations of Candida spp. in urine have been suggested as critical cutoff points in the diagnosis of renal candidiasis, other investigators consider quantitative cultures less critical in diagnosing upper tract infections. To determine the significance of quantitative urine cultures in renal candidiasis, we studied serial quantitative urinary cultures of Candida albicans in a rabbit model of hematogenous infection. Of 197 urine samples from 34 infected animals, 144 were culture positive, with a sensitivity of 73.1% for urine cultures and a lower limit of detection of 10 CFU/ml. The yield of urine cultures varied according to severity and duration of infection. The mean renal and urinary concentrations of C. albicans from rabbits with subacute candidiasis differed significantly from those from rabbits with acute candidiasis (P = 0.013 and P < or = 0.001, respectively). During the first 4 days of subacute renal candidiasis, more than one-half of all urine cultures were negative for C. albicans. Only 12 (8.1%) of 148 urine cultures in animals with subacute renal candidiasis had concentrations of > 10(3) CFU/ml, 2.7% had concentrations of > 10(4) CFU/ml, and none were > or = 10(5) CFU/ml. By comparison, all urine cultures from the animals with lethal acute renal candidiasis had higher concentrations of C. albicans and were positive throughout the course of infection. Urinary concentrations of C. albicans were not predictive of the amount of Candida in the kidney (r < or = 0.49) and did not correlate with survival (r = 0.0232). However, the renal concentration of C. albicans (in CFU/gram) inversely correlated with the duration of survival (in days) of rabbits with renal candidiasis (r = 0.76; P < 0.001). These findings indicate that a negative urine culture in rabbits does not preclude the presence of renal candidiasis. The interpretation of a urine culture positive at any concentration, on the other hand, must involve an analysis of the risk factors for renal candidiasis, for any urinary concentration of C. albicans may reflect kidney infection.
定量尿培养在有血行播散性念珠菌病风险的患者中的意义存在争议。虽然已提出尿液中念珠菌属的各种浓度作为肾念珠菌病诊断的关键临界点,但其他研究者认为定量培养在诊断上尿路感染时不太关键。为了确定定量尿培养在肾念珠菌病中的意义,我们在血行感染的兔模型中研究了白色念珠菌的系列定量尿培养。在来自34只感染动物的197份尿样中,144份培养阳性,尿培养的敏感性为73.1%,检测下限为10 CFU/ml。尿培养的阳性率根据感染的严重程度和持续时间而有所不同。亚急性念珠菌病兔的白色念珠菌平均肾内和尿内浓度与急性念珠菌病兔的有显著差异(分别为P = 0.013和P≤0.001)。在亚急性肾念珠菌病的前4天,超过一半的尿培养白色念珠菌呈阴性。在亚急性肾念珠菌病动物的148份尿培养中,只有12份(8.1%)的浓度>10³CFU/ml,2.7%的浓度>10⁴CFU/ml,没有一份≥10⁵CFU/ml。相比之下,致死性急性肾念珠菌病动物的所有尿培养白色念珠菌浓度更高,且在感染过程中均为阳性。白色念珠菌的尿内浓度不能预测肾脏中的念珠菌数量(r≤0.49),也与生存率无关(r = 0.0232)。然而,白色念珠菌的肾内浓度(CFU/克)与肾念珠菌病兔的生存时间(天)呈负相关(r = 0.76;P < 0.001)。这些发现表明,兔尿培养阴性并不排除肾念珠菌病的存在。另一方面,任何浓度的尿培养阳性结果的解读都必须涉及对肾念珠菌病危险因素的分析,因为白色念珠菌的任何尿内浓度都可能反映肾脏感染。