Frebourg N B, Nouet D, Lemée L, Martin E, Lemeland J F
Laboratoire de Bactériologie, CHU de Rouen, Hôpital Charles Nicolle, France.
J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Jan;36(1):52-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.1.52-57.1998.
The performance characteristics of the E-test (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden), the ATB Staph, the Rapid ATB Staph, and the Vitek GPS-503 card (bioMérieux, La Balme Les Grottes, France) methods for the detection of oxacillin resistance in a collection of staphylococci with a high proportion of troublesome strains were evaluated. Sixty-four Staphylococcus aureus strains and 76 coagulase-negative staphylococcal strains were tested. All strains were mecA positive and were characterized by the oxacillin agar screen plate test; 75 (53.6%) were found to be heterogeneous by a large-inoculum oxacillin disk diffusion assay, and oxacillin MICs for 89 (63.6%) were < or = 32 microg/ml. Three (4.7%) S. aureus strains and 25 (32.9%) coagulase-negative strains were classified as susceptible by the E-test, as defined by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) oxacillin breakpoint (MIC < or = 2 microg/ml). The ATB Staph method failed to detect oxacillin resistance in 7 (11%) S. aureus isolates and 32 (42.1%) coagulase-negative isolates. The MICs for all but six of these discrepant isolates were < or = 16 microg/ml. The Rapid ATB Staph method was tested against S. aureus strains only and yielded 15 (23.4%) false-susceptible results for strains for which the MICs were < or = 32 microg/ml. The Vitek system was the best-performing system, since it failed to detect oxacillin resistance in only 3 (4.7%) S. aureus strains and 15 (19.7%) coagulase-negative strains, the MICs for all of which were < or = 2 microg/ml. These data indicate that (i) the performance of the two ATB Staph systems can be limited when the prevalence of borderline-heteroresistant staphylococci is high and (ii) the unreliability of the E-test and the Vitek methods for detecting resistant coagulase-negative strains might be reduced by the potential revision of the oxacillin breakpoint currently recommended by the NCCLS.
对E-test(AB生物盘公司,瑞典索尔纳)、ATB葡萄球菌检测系统、快速ATB葡萄球菌检测系统以及Vitek GPS-503卡(生物梅里埃公司,法国拉巴尔姆莱格罗特)检测大量含棘手菌株的葡萄球菌中苯唑西林耐药性的方法的性能特征进行了评估。检测了64株金黄色葡萄球菌菌株和76株凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌菌株。所有菌株均为mecA阳性,并通过苯唑西林琼脂筛选平板试验进行鉴定;通过大接种量苯唑西林纸片扩散法发现75株(53.6%)为异质性,89株(63.6%)的苯唑西林MIC≤32μg/ml。按照美国国家临床实验室标准委员会(NCCLS)苯唑西林折点标准(MIC≤2μg/ml),3株(4.7%)金黄色葡萄球菌菌株和25株(32.9%)凝固酶阴性菌株通过E-test检测被分类为敏感。ATB葡萄球菌检测系统未能检测出7株(11%)金黄色葡萄球菌分离株和32株(42.1%)凝固酶阴性分离株的苯唑西林耐药性。除6株外,这些有差异的分离株所有的MIC均≤16μg/ml。快速ATB葡萄球菌检测系统仅针对金黄色葡萄球菌菌株进行了测试,对于MIC≤32μg/ml的菌株得出了15例(23.4%)假敏感结果。Vitek系统是性能最佳的系统,因为它仅未能检测出3株(4.7%)金黄色葡萄球菌菌株和15株(19.7%)凝固酶阴性菌株的苯唑西林耐药性,所有这些菌株的MIC均≤2μg/ml。这些数据表明,(i)当临界异质性耐药葡萄球菌的流行率较高时,两种ATB葡萄球菌检测系统的性能可能受限;(ii)通过对NCCLS目前推荐的苯唑西林折点进行可能的修订,或许可以降低E-test和Vitek方法检测耐药凝固酶阴性菌株时的不可靠性。