Misiewicz J J, Harris A W, Bardhan K D, Levi S, O'Morain C, Cooper B T, Kerr G D, Dixon M F, Langworthy H, Piper D
Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Central Middlesex Hospital NHS Trust, Park Royal, London, UK.
Gut. 1997 Dec;41(6):735-9. doi: 10.1136/gut.41.6.735.
Eradication of Helicobacter pylori cures and prevents the relapse of duodenal ulceration and also results in histological resolution of chronic active gastritis.
To compare four treatment regimens lasting seven days of a proton pump inhibitor and two antibiotics in the eradication of H pylori.
Men or women with H pylori positive duodenal ulceration or gastritis, or both.
A single blind, prospectively randomised, parallel group, comparative, multicentre study. After a positive CLO test, patients underwent histology, H pylori culture, and a 13C urea breath test to confirm H pylori status. Treatment with one of four regimens: LAC, LAM, LCM, or OAM, where L is 30 mg of lansoprazole twice daily, A is 1 g of amoxycillin twice daily, M is 400 mg of metronidazole twice daily, C is 250 mg of clarithromycin twice daily, and O is 20 mg of omeprazole twice daily, was assigned randomly. A follow up breath test was done at least 28 days after completing treatment.
H pylori eradication (intention to treat) was 104/121 (86.0%) with LAC, 87/131 (66.4%) with LAM, 103/118 (87.3%) with LCM, and 94/126 (74.6%) with OAM. There was a significant difference (p < 0.001) in the proportion of patients in whom eradication was successful between LAC and LCM when compared with LAM, but no significant difference (p = 0.15) between LAM and OAM. Metronidazole resistance before treatment was identified as a significant prognostic factor with regard to eradication of H pylori. The regimens which contained metronidazole were significantly less effective than those without metronidazole in the presence of pretreatment resistant H pylori. There was no difference among the treatment groups with regard to the incidence and severity of adverse events reported.
All four treatment regimens were safe and effective in eradicating H pylori in the patient population studied. LAC was the most efficacious treatment in patients with pretreatment metronidazole resistant H pylori, and was significantly better than LAM and OAM in this group of patients.
根除幽门螺杆菌可治愈并预防十二指肠溃疡复发,还能使慢性活动性胃炎的组织学表现消退。
比较四种使用质子泵抑制剂和两种抗生素的七日治疗方案对幽门螺杆菌的根除效果。
幽门螺杆菌阳性的十二指肠溃疡或胃炎患者,或两者皆有的患者,男女不限。
一项单盲、前瞻性随机、平行组、对比性多中心研究。在CLO试验呈阳性后,患者接受组织学检查、幽门螺杆菌培养及13C尿素呼气试验以确认幽门螺杆菌感染状况。随机分配患者接受四种方案之一治疗:LAC、LAM、LCM或OAM,其中L为兰索拉唑30毫克,每日两次;A为阿莫西林1克,每日两次;M为甲硝唑400毫克,每日两次;C为克拉霉素250毫克,每日两次;O为奥美拉唑20毫克,每日两次。治疗结束至少28天后进行随访呼气试验。
LAC方案的幽门螺杆菌根除率(意向性治疗)为104/121(86.0%),LAM方案为87/131(66.4%),LCM方案为103/118(87.3%),OAM方案为94/126(74.6%)。与LAM相比,LAC和LCM方案的根除成功患者比例有显著差异(p < 0.001),但LAM和OAM之间无显著差异(p = 0.15)。治疗前甲硝唑耐药被确定为幽门螺杆菌根除的一个显著预后因素。在存在治疗前耐药幽门螺杆菌的情况下,含甲硝唑的方案明显不如不含甲硝唑的方案有效。各治疗组报告的不良事件发生率和严重程度无差异。
在本研究的患者群体中,所有四种治疗方案在根除幽门螺杆菌方面均安全有效。LAC方案对治疗前甲硝唑耐药的幽门螺杆菌患者最有效,在该组患者中明显优于LAM和OAM方案。