Arikan S, Gür D, Akova M
Department of Clinical Microbiology and Microbiology, Hacettepe University, School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Mycoses. 1997 Nov;40(7-8):291-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.1997.tb00234.x.
Amphotericin B and fluconazole macrodilution minimum inhibitory concentration values of 101 Candida strains isolated from 91 immunocompromised patients were comparatively evaluated with the results of Etest, microdilution and colorimetric microdilution methods. The overall agreement rates of Etest, microdilution and colorimetric microdilution methods with the reference macrodilution method were found to be acceptably high after an incubation period of 24 and 48 h (varying from 86 to 93% for amphotericin B and from 84 to 89% for fluconazole). In addition, the results pointed out relatively high minimum inhibitory concentration values of fluconazole for Candida krusei and Candida glabrata isolates. These methods are not only reliable alternatives to the present reference macrodilution method but are also easy-to-perform and less time-consuming.
对从91名免疫功能低下患者中分离出的101株念珠菌菌株的两性霉素B和氟康唑大稀释最低抑菌浓度值,与Etest、微量稀释法和比色微量稀释法的结果进行了比较评估。在24小时和48小时的培养期后,发现Etest、微量稀释法和比色微量稀释法与参考大稀释法的总体一致率较高(两性霉素B为86%至93%,氟康唑为84%至89%)。此外,结果指出氟康唑对克柔念珠菌和光滑念珠菌分离株的最低抑菌浓度值相对较高。这些方法不仅是当前参考大稀释法的可靠替代方法,而且易于操作且耗时较少。