Lobato Z I, Coupar B E, Gray C P, Lunt R, Andrew M E
CSIRO Australian Animal Health Laboratory, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 1997 Nov;59(3-4):293-309. doi: 10.1016/s0165-2427(97)00084-6.
The role of individual viral proteins in the immune response to bluetongue virus (BTV) is not clearly understood. To investigate the contributions of the outer capsid proteins, VP2 and VP5, and possible interactions between them, these proteins were expressed from recombinant vaccinia viruses either as individual proteins or together in double recombinants, or with the core protein VP7 in a triple recombinant. Comparison of the immunogenicity of the vaccinia expressed proteins with BTV expressed proteins was carried out by inoculation of rabbits and sheep. Each of the recombinants was capable of stimulating an anti-BTV antibody response, although there was a wide range in the level of response between animals and species. Vaccinia-expressed VP2 was poorly immunogenic, particularly in rabbits. VP5, on the whole, stimulated higher ELISA titers in rabbits and sheep and in some animals in both species was able to stimulate virus neutralizing antibodies. When the protective efficacy of VP2 and VP5 was tested in sheep, vaccinia-expressed VP2, VP5 and VP2 + VP5 were protective, with the most consistent protection being in groups immunized with both proteins.
单个病毒蛋白在对蓝舌病病毒(BTV)免疫反应中的作用尚未完全明确。为了研究外膜蛋白VP2和VP5的作用以及它们之间可能的相互作用,这些蛋白通过重组痘苗病毒表达,既可以单独表达,也可以在双重组体中共同表达,或者在三重组体中与核心蛋白VP7一起表达。通过接种兔子和绵羊,比较了痘苗表达蛋白与BTV表达蛋白的免疫原性。每个重组体都能够刺激抗BTV抗体反应,尽管不同动物和物种之间的反应水平差异很大。痘苗表达的VP2免疫原性较差,尤其是在兔子中。总体而言,VP5在兔子和绵羊中刺激的ELISA效价更高,并且在这两个物种的一些动物中能够刺激病毒中和抗体。当在绵羊中测试VP2和VP5的保护效力时,痘苗表达的VP2、VP5和VP2 + VP5具有保护作用,最一致的保护作用出现在用这两种蛋白免疫的组中。