Suppr超能文献

多发性硬化症中MRI病变体积测量及其与残疾的相关性:快速液体衰减反转恢复序列(fFLAIR)与自旋回波序列的比较

MRI lesion volume measurement in multiple sclerosis and its correlation with disability: a comparison of fast fluid attenuated inversion recovery (fFLAIR) and spin echo sequences.

作者信息

Gawne-Cain M L, O'Riordan J I, Coles A, Newell B, Thompson A J, Miller D H

机构信息

Institute of Neurology, The National Hospital, Queen Square, London, UK.

出版信息

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1998 Feb;64(2):197-203. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.64.2.197.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether multiple sclerosis lesion volume measurements derived using the fast fluid attenuated inversion recovery (fFLAIR) sequence show better reproducibility or correlation with disability than those derived using the conventional spin echo (CSE) sequence.

METHODS

Part I: twenty five patients with multiple sclerosis were scanned with CSE, fast spin echo (FSE), and fFLAIR. Lesion volume was determined twice for each sequence using a local threshold segmentation technique. Part II: fifty six patients with multiple sclerosis were scanned with CSE and fFLAIR. Total and regional brain lesion volumes were compared with the Kurtzke extended disability scale (EDSS) and functional systems scores (FSS).

RESULTS

Part I: analysis times were significantly longer for CSE than for FSE or fFLAIR. There was no significant difference in the reproducibility of the three sequences. Part II: total lesion volumes were similar but posterior fossa lesion volumes were significantly greater for CSE and subcortical lesion volumes significantly greater for fFLAIR. There was a significant correlation between total volume and EDSS with both sequences (CSE r=0.49; fFLAIR r=0.44). Correlations for the two sequences showed minor differences when anatomical region and FSS were considered separately.

CONCLUSIONS

CSE, FSE, and fFLAIR are equally reproducible; FSE yields lower volumes than CSE; fFLAIR gives similar volumes to CSE but underscores the posterior fossa. Overall clinical correlations are similar for CSE and fFLAIR.

摘要

目的

评估使用快速液体衰减反转恢复(fFLAIR)序列得出的多发性硬化症病灶体积测量值,与使用传统自旋回波(CSE)序列得出的测量值相比,是否具有更好的可重复性或与残疾程度的相关性。

方法

第一部分:对25例多发性硬化症患者进行CSE、快速自旋回波(FSE)和fFLAIR扫描。使用局部阈值分割技术对每个序列的病灶体积进行两次测定。第二部分:对56例多发性硬化症患者进行CSE和fFLAIR扫描。将全脑和局部脑病灶体积与Kurtzke扩展残疾量表(EDSS)和功能系统评分(FSS)进行比较。

结果

第一部分:CSE的分析时间明显长于FSE或fFLAIR。三个序列的可重复性无显著差异。第二部分:全病灶体积相似,但CSE的后颅窝病灶体积明显更大,fFLAIR的皮质下病灶体积明显更大。两个序列的总体积与EDSS之间均存在显著相关性(CSE r = 0.49;fFLAIR r = 0.44)。当分别考虑解剖区域和FSS时,两个序列的相关性显示出微小差异。

结论

CSE、FSE和fFLAIR具有同等的可重复性;FSE得出的体积比CSE小;fFLAIR得出的体积与CSE相似,但更突出后颅窝。CSE和fFLAIR的总体临床相关性相似。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

9
Measurement error proportional to the mean.测量误差与均值成正比。
BMJ. 1996 Jul 13;313(7049):106. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7049.106.
10
Measurement error.测量误差。
BMJ. 1996 Jun 29;312(7047):1654. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7047.1654.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验