• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心生活质量问卷(QLQ-C30(+3))评估挪威普通人群的健康相关生活质量。

Health-related quality of life in the general Norwegian population assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality-of-Life Questionnaire: the QLQ=C30 (+ 3).

作者信息

Hjermstad M J, Fayers P M, Bjordal K, Kaasa S

机构信息

Norwegian Cancer Society/Department of Medical Oncology and Radiotherapy, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 1998 Mar;16(3):1188-96. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.3.1188.

DOI:10.1200/JCO.1998.16.3.1188
PMID:9508207
Abstract

PURPOSE

To obtain reference data on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) for the functional and symptom scales and single items of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30 [+ 3]) in a representative sample of the Norwegian general population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A randomly selected sample of 3,000 people from the Norwegian population, aged 18 to 93 years, who represent geographic diversity, took part in this postal survey. The EORTC QLQ-C30 (+ 3) and a questionnaire about demographic data and health were sent by mail. A new questionnaire package was sent as a reminder after 3 weeks.

RESULTS

The survey yielded a high response rate with 1,965 of 2,892 eligible persons responding (68%). There was a low amount of missing data (1.8%). Internal consistency was highly satisfactory and yielded Cronbach's alpha coefficients greater than 0.70 for all but two functional scales and one symptom scale. The sensitivity of the questionnaire was shown by the excellent discrimination between age and sex groups. Clinical validity was shown by the distinct differences according to age and sociodemographic characteristics. Women reported lower functional status and global quality of life (mean scale scores from 71.7 to 91.0) than men (mean scale scores from 75.4 to 94.4), and also more symptoms and problems. This was remarkably consistent across age groups, as was a decline in functional status with an increase in age.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study that presented reference data from the EORTC QLQ-C30 (+ 3) in a sample from a general population and seems to provide valid measures of HRQOL within different age groups. The results may serve as a guideline for clinicians when interpreting HRQOL in their own groups of patients, and contributes to a better understanding of the significance of mean scores and their clinical relevance.

摘要

目的

在挪威普通人群的代表性样本中,获取欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心生活质量问卷(EORTC QLQ-C30 [+ 3])功能量表、症状量表及单个项目的健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)参考数据。

患者与方法

从挪威人群中随机抽取3000人,年龄在18至93岁之间,代表地理多样性,参与此次邮寄调查。通过邮件发送EORTC QLQ-C30(+ 3)以及一份关于人口统计学数据和健康状况的问卷。3周后发送新的问卷包作为提醒。

结果

该调查获得了较高的回复率,2892名符合条件的人中,1965人回复(68%)。缺失数据量较低(1.8%)。内部一致性非常令人满意,除两个功能量表和一个症状量表外,所有量表的克朗巴哈系数均大于0.70。问卷的敏感性体现在年龄和性别组之间的出色区分上。临床有效性体现在根据年龄和社会人口学特征存在明显差异。女性报告的功能状态和总体生活质量(平均量表得分从71.7至91.0)低于男性(平均量表得分从75.4至94.4),症状和问题也更多。这在各年龄组中非常一致,功能状态也随着年龄增长而下降。

结论

这是第一项在普通人群样本中呈现EORTC QLQ-C30(+ 3)参考数据的研究,似乎为不同年龄组的HRQOL提供了有效的测量方法。这些结果可为临床医生在解读自己患者群体的HRQOL时提供指导,并有助于更好地理解平均分的意义及其临床相关性。

相似文献

1
Health-related quality of life in the general Norwegian population assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality-of-Life Questionnaire: the QLQ=C30 (+ 3).通过欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心生活质量问卷(QLQ-C30(+3))评估挪威普通人群的健康相关生活质量。
J Clin Oncol. 1998 Mar;16(3):1188-96. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.3.1188.
2
Assessment of change of quality of life in terminally ill patients under cancer pain management using the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in a Korean sample.使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心生活质量问卷(QLQ-C30)对韩国样本中接受癌症疼痛管理的晚期患者的生活质量变化进行评估。
Oncology. 2008;74 Suppl 1:7-12. doi: 10.1159/000143212. Epub 2008 Aug 28.
3
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: an examination into the cultural validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the EORTC QLQ-C30.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织QLQ-C30:对欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织QLQ-C30土耳其语版本的文化效度和信度的考察。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2004 May;13(2):135-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2003.00435.x.
4
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-c30): validation of English version in Singapore.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷(EORTC QLQ-c30):新加坡英文版的验证
Qual Life Res. 2005 May;14(4):1181-6. doi: 10.1007/s11136-004-4782-z.
5
Norwegian general population normative data for the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaires: the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30, the Sexual Health Questionnaire QLQ-SHQ22 and the sexual domains of the QLQ-BR23/BR45.挪威一般人群欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织问卷的常模数据:核心 30 生活质量问卷、性健康问卷 QLQ-SHQ22 和 QLQ-BR23/BR45 的性领域。
Eur J Cancer. 2023 Sep;190:112943. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.112943. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
6
Using reference data on quality of life--the importance of adjusting for age and gender, exemplified by the EORTC QLQ-C30 (+3).利用生活质量参考数据——以欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心生活质量问卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)(+3)为例说明年龄和性别校正的重要性。
Eur J Cancer. 1998 Aug;34(9):1381-9. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(98)00136-1.
7
Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.早期乳腺癌患者的健康相关生活质量
Dan Med Bull. 2010 Sep;57(9):B4184.
8
Population-based reference values for the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Head and Neck module.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织头颈模块的基于人群的参考值。
Head Neck. 2017 Oct;39(10):2036-2047. doi: 10.1002/hed.24870. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
9
Quality of life in head and neck cancer patients: validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-H&N35.头颈癌患者的生活质量:欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷-H&N35的验证
J Clin Oncol. 1999 Mar;17(3):1008-19. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.3.1008.
10
Validity and reliability of the Swedish version of the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS): an instrument for the evaluation of symptom prevalence, characteristics, and distress.《纪念症状评估量表(MSAS)瑞典语版的有效性和可靠性:用于评估症状发生率、特征和痛苦的工具》。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Jul;46(1):131-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.07.023. Epub 2012 Nov 27.

引用本文的文献

1
A nationwide, longitudinal collection of patient-reported outcomes from prostate cancer patients and controls.一项针对前列腺癌患者和对照组的全国性纵向患者报告结局收集研究。
Qual Life Res. 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-04017-7.
2
Long-term quality of life, vulvar symptoms, and sexual functioning: A cross-sectional study of Norwegian vulvar cancer survivors.长期生活质量、外阴症状及性功能:挪威外阴癌幸存者的横断面研究
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Aug;104(8):1505-1516. doi: 10.1111/aogs.15155. Epub 2025 May 14.
3
Identifying Key Factors Influencing Non-adherence to Imatinib Therapy in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.
识别影响慢性髓性白血病患者伊马替尼治疗依从性的关键因素。
Cureus. 2025 Feb 28;17(2):e79831. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79831. eCollection 2025 Feb.
4
Pre- and Post-Operative Quality of Life in Patients with Osteoradionecrosis of the Jaw.颌骨放射性骨坏死患者术前及术后的生活质量
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jun 18;16(12):2256. doi: 10.3390/cancers16122256.
5
A randomized controlled study evaluating the head-lift exercise in head and neck cancer patients with radiation-induced dysphagia: effect on swallowing function and health-related quality of life over 12 months.一项评估头颈部癌症放疗后吞咽困难患者行抬头锻炼的随机对照研究:12 个月时对吞咽功能和健康相关生活质量的影响。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Dec;280(12):5445-5457. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08183-7. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
6
Associations between treatments, comorbidities and multidimensional aspects of quality of life among patients with advanced cancer in the Netherlands-a 2017-2020 multicentre cross-sectional study.荷兰晚期癌症患者的治疗、合并症与多维生活质量之间的关联:一项 2017-2020 年多中心横断面研究。
Qual Life Res. 2023 Nov;32(11):3123-3133. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03460-8. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
7
Quality of life of older gynecologic oncology patients at the initiation of chemotherapy.老年妇科肿瘤患者化疗起始时的生活质量。
Nurs Open. 2023 Oct;10(10):6749-6757. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1921. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
8
Assessment of Quality of Life in Patients with Colorectal Cancer in Kazakhstan.评估哈萨克斯坦结直肠癌患者的生活质量。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2023 May 1;24(5):1827-1833. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.5.1827.
9
Effectiveness of digital care platform CMyLife for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: results of a patient-preference trial.数字护理平台 CMyLife 对慢性髓性白血病患者的疗效:一项患者偏好试验的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Mar 8;23(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09153-9.
10
Gender Differences in Symptom Burden, Functional Performance and Global Quality of Life of Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Inpatient versus Outpatient Treatment.接受住院治疗与门诊治疗的肺癌患者在症状负担、功能表现及总体生活质量方面的性别差异。
Cancer Manag Res. 2023 Feb 21;15:175-183. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S397198. eCollection 2023.