Cull A, Miller H, Porterfield T, Mackay J, Anderson E D, Steel C M, Elton R A
ICRF Medical Oncology Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh.
Br J Cancer. 1998 Mar;77(5):830-7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1998.135.
A video of introductory information about inherited susceptibility to breast cancer was made in consultation with clinicians in four Scottish cancer family clinics. One hundred and twenty-eight women, newly referred for breast cancer risk counselling were randomized to receive the video before (n = 66) or after (n = 62) counselling. Data were collected before randomization at clinic and by postal follow-up at 1 month. The Video Before group had shorter consultations with the breast surgeon (mean = 11.8 min+/-5.4 vs 14.6+/-7.2 for the Video After group). There was no difference between the groups in the accuracy of their risk estimate after counselling, although the Video Before group scored higher for self-reported (Z= 3.65, d.f. = 1, P < 0.01) and objectively assessed understanding (Z= 2.91, d.f. = 1, P < 0.01). At 1 month follow-up, the Video Before group were less likely to underestimate their risk estimate (38% vs 18%; chi2 = 4.62, d.f. = 1, P< 0.05), but there was then no difference between the groups in subjective or objective understanding. Use of the video was not associated with increased distress (GHQ, Spielberger State Anxiety) and was associated with greater satisfaction with the information given at the clinic. This study supports the value of videotape as a method of giving information to prepare women for breast cancer risk counselling. Observations of misunderstandings and distress emphasize the video should be seen as an aid to, not a substitute, for communications at the clinic.
与苏格兰四家癌症家庭诊所的临床医生协商后,制作了一段关于遗传性乳腺癌易感性的介绍视频。128名新接受乳腺癌风险咨询的女性被随机分为两组,一组(n = 66)在咨询前观看视频,另一组(n = 62)在咨询后观看视频。在随机分组前于诊所收集数据,并在1个月后通过邮寄进行随访。“咨询前观看视频”组与乳腺外科医生的咨询时间较短(平均 = 11.8分钟±5.4,“咨询后观看视频”组为14.6±7.2)。咨询后两组在风险估计准确性方面没有差异,尽管“咨询前观看视频”组在自我报告的理解得分(Z = 3.65,自由度 = 1,P < 0.01)和客观评估的理解得分(Z = 2.91,自由度 = 1,P < 0.01)上更高。在1个月的随访中,“咨询前观看视频”组低估其风险估计的可能性较小(38%对18%;卡方 = 4.62,自由度 = 1,P < 0.05),但之后两组在主观或客观理解方面没有差异。视频的使用与痛苦增加无关(一般健康问卷、斯皮尔伯格状态焦虑量表),并且与对诊所提供信息的更高满意度相关。这项研究支持了录像带作为一种向女性提供信息以帮助她们为乳腺癌风险咨询做准备的方法的价值。对误解和痛苦的观察强调,视频应被视为诊所沟通的辅助手段,而非替代方式。