Suppr超能文献

吸入丙酸氟替卡松治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的多中心随机安慰剂对照试验。国际慢性阻塞性肺疾病研究组

Multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial of inhaled fluticasone propionate in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. International COPD Study Group.

作者信息

Paggiaro P L, Dahle R, Bakran I, Frith L, Hollingworth K, Efthimiou J

机构信息

Respiratory Pathophysiology, University of Pisa, Italy.

出版信息

Lancet. 1998 Mar 14;351(9105):773-80. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(97)03471-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains controversial because of a lack of placebo-controlled studies. We compared the effect of inhaled fluticasone propionate with placebo in the treatment of patients with COPD.

METHODS

We used a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. We enrolled from 13 European countries, New Zealand, and South Africa, 281 outpatient current or ex-smokers, aged between 50 and 75 years. They had a forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) of between 35% and 90% of predicted normal values, a ratio of FEV1 to forced vital capacity of 70% or less and bronchodilator reversibility of less than 15%, as well as a history of chronic bronchitis. Patients were randomly assigned fluticasone propionate 500 microg (n=142) or placebo (n=139) twice daily via a metered-dose inhaler for 6 months. The main outcome measures were the number of patients who had at least one exacerbation by the end of treatment, the number and severity of exacerbations, clinic lung function, diary card symptoms and peak expiratory flow and 6 min walking distance.

FINDINGS

51 (37%) patients in the placebo group compared with 45 (32%) in the fluticasone propionate group had had at least one exacerbation by the end of treatment (p=0.449). Significantly more patients had moderate or severe exacerbations in the placebo group than in the fluticasone propionate group (86% vs 60%, p<0.001). Diary-card and clinic morning peak expiratory flows improved significantly in the fluticasone propionate group (p<0.001, p=0.048, respectively), as did clinic FEV1 (p<0.001), forced vital capacity (p<0.001), and mid-expiratory flow (p=0.01). Symptom scores for median daily cough and sputum volume were significantly lower with fluticasone propionate treatment than with placebo (p=0.004 and p=0.016, respectively). At the end of treatment, patients on fluticasone propionate had increased their 6 min walking distance significantly more than those on placebo (p=0.032). Fluticasone propionate was tolerated as well as placebo, with few adverse effects and without a clinically important effect on mean serum cortisol concentration.

INTERPRETATION

Fluticasone propionate may be of clinical benefit in patients with COPD over at least 6 months. Inhaled corticosteroids may have an important role in the long-term treatment of COPD.

摘要

背景

由于缺乏安慰剂对照研究,吸入性糖皮质激素治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的疗效仍存在争议。我们比较了吸入丙酸氟替卡松与安慰剂治疗COPD患者的效果。

方法

我们采用随机、双盲、安慰剂对照设计。从13个欧洲国家、新西兰和南非招募了281名年龄在50至75岁之间的门诊现吸烟者或既往吸烟者。他们的1秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)为预测正常值的35%至90%,FEV1与用力肺活量的比值为70%或更低,支气管扩张剂可逆性小于15%,且有慢性支气管炎病史。患者通过定量吸入器随机分配接受每日两次的500微克丙酸氟替卡松(n = 142)或安慰剂(n = 139)治疗,为期6个月。主要结局指标为治疗结束时至少发生一次病情加重的患者数量、病情加重的次数和严重程度、门诊肺功能、日记卡症状、呼气峰值流速和6分钟步行距离。

结果

治疗结束时,安慰剂组有51名(37%)患者至少发生一次病情加重,而丙酸氟替卡松组为45名(32%)(p = 0.449)。安慰剂组中度或重度病情加重的患者明显多于丙酸氟替卡松组(86%对60%,p < 〇.〇〇1)。丙酸氟替卡松组的日记卡和门诊晨间呼气峰值流速显著改善(分别为p < 〇.〇〇1,p = 0.048),门诊FEV1(p < 〇.〇〇1)、用力肺活量(p < 〇.〇〇1)和呼气中期流速(p = 0.01)也有改善。丙酸氟替卡松治疗的每日咳嗽中位数和痰液量症状评分显著低于安慰剂(分别为p = 0.004和p = 0.016)。治疗结束时,接受丙酸氟替卡松治疗的患者6分钟步行距离的增加明显多于接受安慰剂治疗的患者(p = 0.032)。丙酸氟替卡松与安慰剂的耐受性相同,不良反应少,对平均血清皮质醇浓度无临床重要影响。

解读

丙酸氟替卡松对COPD患者可能至少在6个月内具有临床益处。吸入性糖皮质激素在COPD的长期治疗中可能具有重要作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验