Lamme E N, Gustafsson T O, Middelkoop E
Wound Healing Research Group (K2-210), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Arch Dermatol Res. 1998 Jan-Feb;290(1-2):18-24. doi: 10.1007/s004030050271.
The use of iodine in wound healing is still controversial. Both wound healing-stimulating effects and toxic effects leading to impaired wound healing have been reported. In order to study the direct effects of iodine on wound healing without interference of infectious pathogens, we investigated wound-healing parameters in noninfected experimental full-thickness wounds in the pig. Topical iodine treatment with an ointment consisting of a combination of iodine and cadexomer (modified starch), was compared with cadexomer ointment, the vehicle without iodine, and with treatment with saline. Treatment lasted for 30 days, followed by 30 days of wound assessment. The rate of epithelialization, wound contraction, systemic iodine absorption and several immunohistochemical markers were evaluated. All 36 wounds healed without macroscopic signs of wound infection and reepithelialized within 21 days. During the first 9 days of treatment, wounds treated with cadexomer-iodine ointment showed significantly more epithelialization than the wounds treated with either cadexomer or saline. In addition, the epidermis of wounds treated with cadexomer-iodine ointment had significantly more epithelial cell layers from day 12 to day 30, and these wounds stained for chondroitin sulphate proteoglycans in the newly formed basement membrane zone, which was not observed with the other treatments. No negative effects of cadexomer-iodine ointment on the formation of granulation tissue, neovascularization or wound contraction were observed. During the treatment systemic iodine absorption was physiologically acceptable. These results showed that treatment with cadexomer-iodine-containing ointment had positive effects on epidermal regeneration during the healing of full-thickness wounds in the pig compared with ointment alone or saline treatment.
碘在伤口愈合中的应用仍存在争议。既有促进伤口愈合的作用报道,也有导致伤口愈合受损的毒性作用报道。为了研究碘对伤口愈合的直接影响而不受感染病原体的干扰,我们在猪的非感染性实验性全层伤口中研究了伤口愈合参数。将含碘和卡地姆胶原(改性淀粉)组合的软膏进行局部碘治疗,与不含碘的赋形剂卡地姆胶原软膏以及生理盐水治疗进行比较。治疗持续30天,随后进行30天的伤口评估。评估了上皮化率、伤口收缩、全身碘吸收以及几种免疫组化标志物。所有36个伤口均愈合,无伤口感染的宏观迹象,并在21天内重新上皮化。在治疗的前9天,用卡地姆胶原碘软膏治疗的伤口比用卡地姆胶原或生理盐水治疗的伤口显示出明显更多的上皮化。此外,从第12天到第30天,用卡地姆胶原碘软膏治疗的伤口表皮有明显更多的上皮细胞层,并且这些伤口在新形成的基底膜区硫酸软骨素蛋白聚糖染色,而其他治疗未观察到这种情况。未观察到卡地姆胶原碘软膏对肉芽组织形成、新血管形成或伤口收缩有负面影响。在治疗期间,全身碘吸收在生理上是可接受的。这些结果表明,与单独使用软膏或生理盐水治疗相比,含卡地姆胶原碘的软膏治疗对猪全层伤口愈合过程中的表皮再生有积极作用。