Rundmo T, Sjöberg L
Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Risk Anal. 1998 Feb;18(1):111-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1998.tb00921.x.
This article presents the results of analyses of employee subjective risk assessments caused by platform movements on an offshore oil installation in the Norwegian sector of the North Sea. The results are based on a self-completion questionnaire survey conducted among 179 respondents covering three shifts on the platform. The data collection was carried out during the spring of 1994. A minority expressed worry due to platform movements. A greater proportion of the personnel stated worry about the construction of the platform. The personnel were more unsafe when they assessed their own safety attitudes with regard to specific potentially hazardous consequences of platform movements. Two approaches aimed at modeling worry and concern caused by platform movements were tested. The models were the mental imagery approach and the rationalistic approach. The rationalistic and mental imagery models fitted equally well. Implications of the results for risk communication are discussed.
本文介绍了对北海挪威海域一座海上石油设施平台移动所导致的员工主观风险评估的分析结果。这些结果基于对该平台三个班次的179名受访者进行的自填式问卷调查。数据收集于1994年春季进行。少数人因平台移动而表示担忧。更大比例的人员表示担心平台的建设。当员工评估自己对平台移动的特定潜在危险后果的安全态度时,他们感觉更不安全。测试了两种旨在模拟由平台移动引起的担忧和关注的方法。这两种模型分别是心理意象法和理性主义法。理性主义模型和心理意象模型的拟合效果相当。文中还讨论了这些结果对风险沟通的启示。