• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Variations in population health status: results from a United Kingdom national questionnaire survey.人群健康状况的差异:英国全国问卷调查结果
BMJ. 1998 Mar 7;316(7133):736-41. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7133.736.
2
[Health Status of the German population: results of a representative survey using the EuroQol questionnaire].[德国人口的健康状况:使用欧洲生活质量调查问卷进行的代表性调查结果]
Gesundheitswesen. 2005 Mar;67(3):173-82. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-857991.
3
Self-assessed health status in Poland: EQ-5D findings from the Polish valuation study.波兰的自我评估健康状况:波兰估值研究中的EQ-5D结果
Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2010 Jul;120(7-8):276-81.
4
Health-related quality of life measured using the EQ-5D-5L: South Australian population norms.使用EQ-5D-5L量表测量的健康相关生活质量:南澳大利亚州人群常模。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Sep 20;14(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0537-0.
5
Variations in self-reported health status: results from a New Zealand survey.自我报告的健康状况差异:新西兰一项调查的结果。
N Z Med J. 2000 Dec 8;113(1123):517-20.
6
Changes in health-related quality of life of Chinese populations measured by the EQ-5D-3 L: a comparison of the 2008 and 2013 National Health Services Surveys.2008 年和 2013 年国家卫生服务调查中测量的中国人群健康相关生活质量的变化: EQ-5D-3L 的比较。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Mar 11;17(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1109-x.
7
The health status of the Dutch population as assessed by the EQ-6D.通过EQ-6D评估的荷兰人口健康状况。
Qual Life Res. 2005 Apr;14(3):655-63. doi: 10.1007/s11136-004-1214-z.
8
Comparison of population health status in six european countries: results of a representative survey using the EQ-5D questionnaire.六个欧洲国家人群健康状况比较:使用EQ-5D问卷进行的代表性调查结果
Med Care. 2009 Feb;47(2):255-61. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318184759e.
9
Measuring population health: a comparison of three generic health status measures.衡量人群健康状况:三种通用健康状况测量方法的比较。
Med Care. 2003 Feb;41(2):218-31. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000044901.57067.19.
10
Estimates of prevalence, demographic characteristics and social factors among people with disabilities in the USA: a cross-survey comparison.美国残疾人的患病率、人口特征及社会因素估计:一项跨调查比较
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 14;8(2):e017828. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017828.

引用本文的文献

1
Do generic population utility scores accurately represent real-world experienced health?通用人群效用评分能否准确代表现实世界中经历的健康状况?
Qual Life Res. 2025 Sep 10. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-04060-4.
2
Digital augmentation of aftercare for patients with anorexia nervosa: the TRIANGLE RCT and economic evaluation.神经性厌食症患者后期护理的数字化增强:TRIANGLE随机对照试验及经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(31):1-162. doi: 10.3310/ADLS3672.
3
CITA GO-ON study. A community based multidomain lifestyle intervention to prevent cognitive decline. Protocol design and recruitment process.CITA GO-ON研究。一项基于社区的多领域生活方式干预预防认知衰退的研究。方案设计与招募过程。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2025 Jun 16;17:1539711. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1539711. eCollection 2025.
4
Is It Cost-Effective to Induce Labour Early to Prevent Shoulder Dystocia? Evidence From the Big Baby Trial.早期引产以预防肩难产是否具有成本效益?来自巨大儿试验的证据。
BJOG. 2025 Aug;132(9):1250-1258. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.18160. Epub 2025 May 1.
5
Activities of daily living limitations in relation to the presence of pain in community-dwelling older adults.社区居住的老年人日常生活活动受限与疼痛存在的关系。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 29;15(1):15027. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00241-w.
6
The Burden of Adult X-Linked Hypophosphatemia on Carers and Family Members: A Mixed-Methods Study.成人X连锁低磷血症对护理人员和家庭成员的负担:一项混合方法研究。
J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2025 Apr 24;12(1):162-170. doi: 10.36469/001c.133860. eCollection 2025.
7
Comparing Five Major Knee Osteoarthritis Cohort Studies: Similarities, Differences, and Unique Aspects of CHECK, OAI, FNIH, IMI-APPROACH, and MOST.比较五项主要的膝关节骨关节炎队列研究:CHECK、OAI、FNIH、IMI - APPROACH和MOST的异同及独特之处。
Cartilage. 2025 Mar 19:19476035251326276. doi: 10.1177/19476035251326276.
8
A standard gamble study to determine health state utilities associated with seizures in glioma in the UK.一项在英国开展的标准博弈研究,旨在确定与胶质瘤癫痫发作相关的健康状态效用值。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025 Mar 11;23(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12955-025-02348-0.
9
Improved Items for Estimating SF-36 Profile and Summary Component Scores: Construction and Validation of an 8-Item QOL General (QGEN) Survey.用于评估SF-36量表简表及汇总成分得分的改良条目:8条目生活质量通用(QGEN)调查问卷的构建与验证
Med Care. 2025 Apr 1;63(4):300-310. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000002122. Epub 2025 Jan 20.
10
Quality-Adjusted Life Expectancy Norms Based on the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 for China.基于EQ-5D-5L和SF-6Dv2的中国质量调整生命预期规范
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 Mar;23(2):291-310. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00925-w. Epub 2024 Dec 13.

本文引用的文献

1
EuroQol: the current state of play.欧洲生活质量量表:当前进展情况
Health Policy. 1996 Jul;37(1):53-72. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(96)00822-6.
2
Multi-attribute preference functions. Health Utilities Index.多属性偏好函数。健康效用指数。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1995 Jun;7(6):503-20. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199507060-00005.
3
EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life.欧洲生活质量量表——一种衡量健康相关生活质量的新工具。
Health Policy. 1990 Dec;16(3):199-208. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9.
4
An empirical comparison of four generic health status measures. The Nottingham Health Profile, the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey, the COOP/WONCA charts, and the EuroQol instrument.四种通用健康状况测量方法的实证比较。诺丁汉健康量表、医学结果研究36项简短健康调查、COOP/WONCA图表以及欧洲生活质量量表。
Med Care. 1997 May;35(5):522-37. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199705000-00008.
5
Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine.健康与医学成本效益小组的建议
JAMA. 1996 Oct 16;276(15):1253-8.
6
Randomised trial comparing hysterectomy and transcervical endometrial resection: effect on health related quality of life and costs two years after surgery.比较子宫切除术和经宫颈子宫内膜切除术的随机试验:对术后两年健康相关生活质量和成本的影响。
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996 Feb;103(2):142-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09666.x.
7
Testing the validity of the Euroqol and comparing it with the SF-36 health survey questionnaire.检验欧洲五维度健康量表的有效性并将其与SF-36健康调查问卷作比较。
Qual Life Res. 1993 Jun;2(3):169-80. doi: 10.1007/BF00435221.
8
Validity of Euroqol--a generic health status instrument--in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Economic and Health Outcomes Research Group.欧洲五维度健康量表(一种通用健康状况工具)在类风湿关节炎患者中的效度。经济与健康结果研究小组。
Br J Rheumatol. 1994 Jul;33(7):655-62. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/33.7.655.
9
Test-retest reliability of health state valuations collected with the EuroQol questionnaire.使用欧洲五维健康量表问卷收集的健康状态评估的重测信度。
Soc Sci Med. 1994 Dec;39(11):1537-44. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90005-1.
10
Health inequalities in early adulthood: a comparison of young men and women in Britain and Finland.成年早期的健康不平等:英国和芬兰青年男女的比较。
Soc Sci Med. 1995 Jul;41(2):163-71. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)00320-s.

人群健康状况的差异:英国全国问卷调查结果

Variations in population health status: results from a United Kingdom national questionnaire survey.

作者信息

Kind P, Dolan P, Gudex C, Williams A

机构信息

Centre for Health Economics, University of York.

出版信息

BMJ. 1998 Mar 7;316(7133):736-41. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7133.736.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.316.7133.736
PMID:9529408
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC28477/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To measure the health of a representative sample of the population of the United Kingdom by using the EuroQoL EQ-5D questionnaire.

DESIGN

Stratified random sample representative of the general population aged 18 and over and living in the community.

SETTING

United Kingdom.

SUBJECTS

3395 people resident in the United Kingdom.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Average values for mobility, self care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression.

RESULTS

One in three respondents reported problems with pain or discomfort. There were differences in the perception of health according to the respondent's age, social class, education, housing tenure, economic position, and smoking behaviour.

CONCLUSIONS

The EQ-5D questionnaire is a practical way of measuring the health of a population and of detecting differences in subgroups of the population.

摘要

目的

使用欧洲五维度健康量表(EuroQoL EQ-5D)问卷来衡量英国具有代表性的人群样本的健康状况。

设计

对年龄在18岁及以上且居住在社区的普通人群具有代表性的分层随机样本。

地点

英国。

研究对象

3395名居住在英国的人。

主要观察指标

行动能力、自我护理、日常活动、疼痛或不适以及焦虑或抑郁的平均值。

结果

三分之一的受访者报告有疼痛或不适问题。根据受访者的年龄、社会阶层、教育程度、住房保有形式、经济状况和吸烟行为,对健康的认知存在差异。

结论

欧洲五维度健康量表(EuroQoL EQ-5D)问卷是衡量人群健康状况以及检测人群亚组差异的一种实用方法。