Inoue K, Nadaoka T, Oiji A, Morioka Y, Totsuka S, Kanbayashi Y, Hukui T
Department of Neuro-Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Yamagata University, Japan.
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 1998 Spring;28(3):179-88. doi: 10.1023/a:1022885827086.
This study assessed the diagnostic potential of the actigraph, the Continuous Performance Test, and the Matching Familiar Figures Test in diagnosing attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Twenty boys previously diagnosed with ADHD and 52 controls were examined. By these measures the boys with ADHD were differentiated from the controls with sensitivity and specificity above 75%. We were able to classify ADHD into eight subtypes by combining the scores of the actigraph and the CPT: "hyperactive-impulsive", "hyperactive-inattentive", "impulsive-inattentive", "hyperactive", "impulsive", "inattentive", "mixed", and "unspecified" type. These classifications may be useful in diagnosing ADHD.
本研究评估了活动记录仪、持续性操作测验和匹配熟悉图形测验在诊断注意力缺陷多动障碍（ADHD）方面的诊断潜力。对20名先前被诊断为ADHD的男孩和52名对照组进行了检查。通过这些测量方法，ADHD男孩与对照组得以区分，其敏感性和特异性均高于75%。通过结合活动记录仪和持续性操作测验的分数，我们能够将ADHD分为八个亚型：“多动-冲动型”、“多动-注意力不集中型”、“冲动-注意力不集中型”、“多动型”、“冲动型”、“注意力不集中型”、“混合型”和“未特定型”。这些分类可能有助于ADHD的诊断。
