Suppr超能文献

四种从血培养物中快速鉴定金黄色葡萄球菌方法的评估

Evaluation of four methods for rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus from blood cultures.

作者信息

Speers D J, Olma T R, Gilbert G L

机构信息

Center for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology Laboratory Services, Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical Research, Westmead Hospital, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Apr;36(4):1032-4. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.4.1032-1034.1998.

Abstract

The identification of Staphylococcus aureus directly from blood cultures is clinically relevant, but it requires a test that is both rapid and reliable. Previously, biochemical, immunological, tube coagulase, and thermostable-endonuclease methods have shown variable sensitivity and specificity. Testing directly from blood culture broth has not been described for the latex kit Staphaurex Plus (Murex Diagnostics Ltd.), and the modified conventional tests have not been used with the newer, continuously monitored blood culture systems. In addition, the commercial RAPIDEC staph kit (bioMerieux Vitek, Inc.) has been used to detect S. aureus directly from the Vital blood culture system (bioMerieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France), but its performance has not been evaluated with other continuously monitored systems. A total of 201 clinical blood cultures (BACTEC 9240 culture system; Johnston Laboratories, Inc.) in which a Gram stain showed gram-positive cocci resembling staphylococci were evaluated prospectively. The Staphaurex Plus kit, the tube coagulase test, the thermostable-endonuclease test, and the RAPIDEC staph kit were compared. The sensitivities were 23, 92, 85, and 98% and the specificities were 99, 100, 93, and 100%, respectively. The RAPIDEC staph kit was the most reliable test, with a diagnostic accuracy comparable to that of the best published results for any of the rapid tests. However, it was the most expensive of the tests and relatively labor-intensive. The tube coagulase test was also sensitive, the simplest to perform, and inexpensive.

摘要

直接从血培养物中鉴定金黄色葡萄球菌具有临床相关性,但这需要一种快速且可靠的检测方法。以前,生化、免疫、试管凝固酶和耐热核酸酶方法的敏感性和特异性各不相同。尚未有关于使用乳胶试剂盒Staphaurex Plus(Murex诊断有限公司)直接从血培养肉汤中进行检测的描述,并且改良的传统检测方法也未与更新的、持续监测的血培养系统一起使用。此外,商业RAPIDEC葡萄球菌试剂盒(生物梅里埃维泰克公司)已用于直接从Vital血培养系统(法国马西伊图瓦勒的生物梅里埃公司)中检测金黄色葡萄球菌,但其性能尚未在其他持续监测系统中进行评估。前瞻性地评估了总共201份临床血培养物(BACTEC 9240培养系统;约翰斯顿实验室公司),其中革兰氏染色显示革兰氏阳性球菌类似葡萄球菌。比较了Staphaurex Plus试剂盒、试管凝固酶试验、耐热核酸酶试验和RAPIDEC葡萄球菌试剂盒。敏感性分别为23%、92%、85%和98%,特异性分别为99%、100%、93%和100%。RAPIDEC葡萄球菌试剂盒是最可靠的检测方法,其诊断准确性与任何快速检测方法中已发表的最佳结果相当。然而,它是所有检测方法中最昂贵的,且相对劳动强度较大。试管凝固酶试验也很敏感,操作最简单且成本低廉。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验