Suppr超能文献

通过氧自由基吸收能力和电子顺磁共振评估吲达帕胺、5-羟基吲达帕胺和氢氯噻嗪的抗氧化特性。

Antioxidant properties of indapamide, 5-OH indapamide and hydrochlorothiazide evaluated by oxygen-radical absorbing capacity and electron paramagnetic resonance.

作者信息

Vergely C, Walker M K, Zeller M, Rademakers J R, Maupoil V, Schiavi P, Guez D, Rochette L

机构信息

Laboratoire de Physiopathologie et Pharmacologie Cardiovasculaires Expérimentales, Faculté de Médecine, Dijon, France.

出版信息

Mol Cell Biochem. 1998 Jan;178(1-2):151-5. doi: 10.1023/a:1006845612499.

Abstract

The aim of these experiments was to investigate the radical scavenging properties of three diuretics: indapamide (IND) and its major metabolite, 5-OH indapamide (5-OH IND), compared to a reference diuretic, hydrochlorothiazide (HTZ). Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) was used to determine the scavenging abilities of these compounds on enzymatically produced superoxide radical anion, with 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide (DMPO) used as a spin-trap. These experiments revealed that IND and specially 5-OH IND were effective superoxide radical anion scavengers at 0.2 mg/ml. In the second part of these studies, allophycocyanin was used as an indicator of free radical mediated protein damage. In the assay, 2,2'-azobis(2-amidinopropane) hydrochloride (AAPH) was used as a peroxyl radical generator, Trolox (a water-soluble analogue of vitamin E) as a control standard, and the loss of allophycocyanin fluorescence was monitored. The antioxidant effects of the diuretics were expressed in oxygen-radical absorbing capacity (ORAC), where one ORAC unit equals the net protection produced by 1 microM Trolox. HTZ showed no protection up to 100 microM final concentration, whereas IND and 5-OH IND showed linear correlation with respect to concentration when expressed in ORAC units: 5-OH IND induced the highest protection against peroxyl radical. The above observations suggested that IND and 5-OH IND are potent radical scavengers, with the metabolite 5-OH IND having a superior antioxidant potency than IND. By contrast, HTZ had no effect. These radical scavenging properties of 5-OH IND may be of clinical interest for vascular protection and may help to protect the heart from oxidative injury.

摘要

这些实验的目的是研究三种利尿剂的自由基清除特性

吲达帕胺(IND)及其主要代谢产物5-羟基吲达帕胺(5-OH IND),并与参考利尿剂氢氯噻嗪(HTZ)进行比较。采用电子顺磁共振(EPR)来测定这些化合物对酶促产生的超氧阴离子自由基的清除能力,以5,5-二甲基-1-吡咯啉N-氧化物(DMPO)作为自旋捕获剂。这些实验表明,IND尤其是5-OH IND在0.2 mg/ml时是有效的超氧阴离子自由基清除剂。在这些研究的第二部分中,别藻蓝蛋白被用作自由基介导的蛋白质损伤的指标。在该测定中,2,2'-偶氮二(2-脒基丙烷)盐酸盐(AAPH)用作过氧自由基发生器,生育酚类似物(维生素E的水溶性类似物)用作对照标准,并监测别藻蓝蛋白荧光的损失。利尿剂的抗氧化作用以氧自由基吸收能力(ORAC)表示,其中一个ORAC单位等于1 microM生育酚类似物产生的净保护作用。在最终浓度高达100 microM时,HTZ没有显示出保护作用,而当以ORAC单位表示时,IND和5-OH IND的保护作用与浓度呈线性相关:5-OH IND对过氧自由基的保护作用最强。上述观察结果表明,IND和5-OH IND是有效的自由基清除剂,其代谢产物5-OH IND的抗氧化能力优于IND。相比之下,HTZ没有作用。5-OH IND的这些自由基清除特性可能对血管保护具有临床意义,并可能有助于保护心脏免受氧化损伤。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验