• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癫痫的主观障碍。一种衡量治疗效果的新方法。

The subjective handicap of epilepsy. A new approach to measuring treatment outcome.

作者信息

O'Donoghue M F, Duncan J S, Sander J W

机构信息

Epilepsy Research Group, Institute of Neurology, London, UK.

出版信息

Brain. 1998 Feb;121 ( Pt 2):317-43. doi: 10.1093/brain/121.2.317.

DOI:10.1093/brain/121.2.317
PMID:9549509
Abstract

It is now widely acknowledged that the impact of epilepsy on the individual extends beyond the occurrence of seizures, and that there is a need for outcome measures sensitive to these consequences. Until now these instruments have largely been developed within a 'quality of life' framework. The technical and conceptual difficulties that arise with measuring quality of life have led us to develop a more focused measurement model, the 'Subjective Handicap of Epilepsy' (SHE) scale, based on the World Health Organization's concept of handicap. The scale contains 32 items in six subscales: 'Work and activities' (eight items), 'Social and personal' (four items), 'Self-perception' (five items), 'Physical' (four items), 'Life-satisfaction' (four items) and a 'Change' scale (seven items); and it takes on average < 10 min to complete. The scale's test-retest reliability was found to be satisfactory (intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.8-0.9 in 110 subjects). The test-retest interval (24 h to 8 weeks) had no influence on the reliability. The reliability was also not affected by minor recent fluctuations in seizure frequency. The internal consistency of the scales was 0.8-0.9 (Cronbach's alpha). The construct validity of the scale was examined in a sample of 287 clinic attendees at a university neurology clinic in the UK. The scales were highly sensitive to the handicapping effects of increasing seizure frequency, employment status, the impact of epilepsy on career choice and the subject's own opinion as to the major determinant of their quality of life. The scales were also sensitive, retrospectively, to the benefits of successful epilepsy surgery in a cohort of 105 patients. Scales focusing specifically on handicap were more sensitive to group differences in seizure frequency in the clinic population, and to outcome after epilepsy surgery, than the 'Life-satisfaction' scale and the Epilepsy Surgery Inventory 55 (ESI-55) scales. This supports the contention that measuring 'subjective handicap' may be a more sensitive, and more useful, approach to assessing the impact of interventions on the long-term consequences of epilepsy than current methods.

摘要

现在人们普遍认识到,癫痫对个人的影响不仅限于发作的发生,而且需要对这些后果敏感的结果测量指标。到目前为止,这些工具大多是在“生活质量”框架内开发的。测量生活质量时出现的技术和概念难题促使我们基于世界卫生组织的残疾概念,开发了一种更具针对性的测量模型,即“癫痫主观残疾”(SHE)量表。该量表包含32个项目,分为六个分量表:“工作与活动”(8个项目)、“社交与个人”(4个项目)、“自我认知”(5个项目)、“身体”(4个项目)、“生活满意度”(4个项目)和一个“变化”量表(7个项目);平均完成时间不到10分钟。该量表的重测信度令人满意(110名受试者的组内相关系数为0.8 - 0.9)。重测间隔(24小时至8周)对信度没有影响。信度也不受近期发作频率轻微波动的影响。量表的内部一致性为0.8 - 0.9(克朗巴哈α系数)。在英国一家大学神经科诊所的287名门诊患者样本中检验了该量表的结构效度。该量表对发作频率增加的致残影响、就业状况、癫痫对职业选择的影响以及受试者自己对其生活质量主要决定因素的看法高度敏感。该量表对105名患者队列中成功进行癫痫手术后的益处也具有回顾性敏感性。与“生活满意度”量表和癫痫手术量表55(ESI - 55)相比,专门关注残疾的量表对门诊人群中发作频率的组间差异以及癫痫手术后的结果更敏感。这支持了这样一种观点,即与目前的方法相比,测量“主观残疾”可能是评估干预措施对癫痫长期后果影响的一种更敏感、更有用的方法。

相似文献

1
The subjective handicap of epilepsy. A new approach to measuring treatment outcome.癫痫的主观障碍。一种衡量治疗效果的新方法。
Brain. 1998 Feb;121 ( Pt 2):317-43. doi: 10.1093/brain/121.2.317.
2
The psychometric properties of the Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire in a Dutch-speaking population.耳鸣残疾问卷在荷兰语人群中的心理测量特性。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2011 Feb;36(1):9-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2010.02256.x.
3
The reliability, validity, and preliminary responsiveness of the Eye Allergy Patient Impact Questionnaire (EAPIQ).眼部过敏患者影响问卷(EAPIQ)的信度、效度及初步反应性
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005 Oct 31;3:67. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-3-67.
4
[Caregiver burden in relatives of persons with schizophrenia: an overview of measure instruments].[精神分裂症患者亲属的照顾者负担:测量工具概述]
Encephale. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):137-47.
5
Psychometric evaluation of the Serbian version of the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-31 (QOLIE-31).《癫痫患者生活质量量表-31 (QOLIE-31)塞尔维亚语版的心理计量学评估》。
Seizure. 2010 Oct;19(8):517-24. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2010.07.012. Epub 2010 Aug 12.
6
A health-related quality of life instrument for patients evaluated for epilepsy surgery.一种用于接受癫痫手术评估患者的健康相关生活质量量表。
Med Care. 1992 Apr;30(4):299-319. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199204000-00002.
7
Psychometric validation of an Assessment Questionnaire on the Perception of and Adaptation to Visual Handicap in Adults (QUEPAHVA).成人视觉障碍感知与适应评估问卷(QUEPAHVA)的心理测量学验证
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2020 Dec;43(10):e341-e350. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2020.09.001. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
8
The initial development of a health-related quality of life model as an outcome measure in epilepsy.作为癫痫预后指标的健康相关生活质量模型的初步开发。
Epilepsy Res. 1993 Sep;16(1):65-81. doi: 10.1016/0920-1211(93)90041-5.
9
The development of a handicap assessment questionnaire: the Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA).障碍评估问卷的开发:对参与和自主的影响(IPA)。
Clin Rehabil. 1999 Oct;13(5):411-9. doi: 10.1191/026921599668601325.
10
The development and psychometric properties of the bipolar disorders knowledge scale.双相障碍知识量表的编制及心理测量学特性。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Oct 1;238:645-650. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.05.043. Epub 2018 Jun 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancement of Subjective Quality of Life Following Surgical Intervention in Patients With Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Depressive Symptom-Independent Outcome.药物难治性癫痫患者手术干预后主观生活质量的提高:一项与抑郁症状无关的结果。
Cureus. 2024 Apr 8;16(4):e57831. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57831. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
Response to antiseizure medications in epileptic patients with malformation of cortical development.皮质发育畸形的癫痫患者对抗癫痫药物的反应
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2021 Oct 12;14:17562864211050027. doi: 10.1177/17562864211050027. eCollection 2021.
3
Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) assessment in epilepsy: a review of epilepsy-specific PROs according to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory requirements.
癫痫患者报告结局(PRO)评估:根据美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)监管要求评估的癫痫专用 PRO 综述。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Mar 11;11:38. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-38.
4
Quality of life after epilepsy surgery in Korea.韩国癫痫手术后的生活质量。
J Clin Neurol. 2008 Sep;4(3):116-22. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2008.4.3.116. Epub 2008 Sep 30.
5
The impact of epilepsy on subjective health status.癫痫对主观健康状况的影响。
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2003 Jul;3(4):357-62. doi: 10.1007/s11910-003-0014-0.
6
The goals of medicine. Towards a unified theory.医学的目标。迈向统一理论。
Health Care Anal. 2001;9(1):1-13. doi: 10.1023/A:1011385310274.
7
Assessing the psychosocial consequences of epilepsy: a community-based study.评估癫痫的社会心理后果:一项基于社区的研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Mar;49(440):211-4.