Matthews L R
School of Community Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Psychiatr Serv. 1998 Feb;49(2):207-12. doi: 10.1176/ps.49.2.207.
The study examined the efficacy of critical incident stress debriefing in ameliorating the impact of posttraumatic stress on direct care psychiatric workers after a traumatic event at work.
Sixty-three direct care workers from two areas in Sydney, Australia, who worked in community residences for persons with developmental and psychiatric disabilities were surveyed about symptoms of intrusive thoughts, avoidance, and hyperarousal one week after they experienced an assault or another type of work-related trauma. Survey respondents included 14 workers who requested and attended a one-session critical incident stress debriefing during the week after the incident, 18 workers from the same area of Sydney who had access to the intervention but chose not to attend, and 31 who worked in an area where the intervention was not available.
Sixty-two workers reported symptoms of posttraumatic stress. Lower levels were reported by workers in the area where the intervention was available. When other factors were controlled, the lowest levels of stress were reported by workers to whom the debriefing was available but who chose not to attend. No significant difference in overall stress reduction in the week after the incident was found between the workers who received the intervention and those who did not.
Although critical incident stress debriefing was evaluated positively by the majority of participants, aspects of the intervention such as its timing and the work environment in which it is offered may affect the degree to which participants benefit from it.
本研究考察了在工作中经历创伤事件后,危机事件应激晤谈在减轻创伤后应激对直接护理精神科工作人员影响方面的效果。
对来自澳大利亚悉尼两个地区、在为发育障碍和精神疾病患者提供社区居住服务的机构中工作的63名直接护理人员进行了调查,询问他们在经历袭击或其他与工作相关的创伤事件一周后出现的侵入性思维、回避和过度警觉症状。调查对象包括14名在事件发生后一周内要求并参加了一次危机事件应激晤谈的工作人员、18名来自悉尼同一地区且有机会接受干预但选择不参加的工作人员,以及31名在未提供该干预措施地区工作的人员。
62名工作人员报告有创伤后应激症状。在可获得干预措施的地区工作的人员报告的症状水平较低。在控制了其他因素后,可获得晤谈但选择不参加的工作人员报告的应激水平最低。在事件发生后的一周内,接受干预的工作人员和未接受干预的工作人员在总体应激减轻方面没有发现显著差异。
尽管大多数参与者对危机事件应激晤谈给予了积极评价,但该干预措施的一些方面,如实施时间和提供干预的工作环境,可能会影响参与者从中受益的程度。