Lowe D
Department of Psychology, Trent University, Peterborough, ON, Canada.
Mem Cognit. 1998 May;26(3):435-43. doi: 10.3758/bf03201153.
An episodic retrieval account of negative priming (Neill, 1997; Neill & Valdes, 1992) was evaluated in three experiments. During practice, regular word pairs were presented to subjects differing numbers of times. The subjects named specific target words while they ignored specific distractor words. Following a 5-min retention interval, memory for practice was revealed: Test responses for target words exhibited positive priming that increased with increases in the number of times that the words had been attended. Test responses for distractor words exhibited either positive priming (Experiment 1) or negative priming (Experiments 2-3) that also increased with increases in the number of times that the words had been ignored. The type of priming that distractors exhibited was determined by several contextual similarities between the practice environment, in which distractors were ignored initially, and the test environments, in which they were processed subsequently. Negative priming that spanned a 5-min interval, increased with increases in the number of times that a distractor was ignored, and was sensitive to contextual changes indicated that the direction of the effect was temporally backward because the test probe cued memory for earlier processing of the priming stimulus when the distractor had been ignored.
在三个实验中评估了负启动效应的情景检索解释(Neill,1997;Neill和Valdes,1992)。在练习期间,向受试者呈现不同次数的常规单词对。受试者在忽略特定干扰词的同时说出特定目标词。经过5分钟的保持间隔后,揭示了对练习的记忆:目标词的测试反应表现出正启动效应,且随着单词被关注次数的增加而增强。干扰词的测试反应表现出正启动效应(实验1)或负启动效应(实验2 - 3),同样随着单词被忽略次数的增加而增强。干扰词所表现出的启动效应类型取决于练习环境(最初忽略干扰词的环境)与测试环境(随后处理干扰词的环境)之间的几种情境相似性。跨越5分钟间隔、随着干扰词被忽略次数增加而增强且对情境变化敏感的负启动效应表明,该效应的方向是时间上向后的,因为当干扰词被忽略时,测试探针提示了对启动刺激早期处理的记忆。