Litscher G, Hadolt I, Eger E
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Graz, Austria.
Biomed Tech (Berl). 1998 May;43(5):133-6. doi: 10.1515/bmte.1998.43.5.133.
We evaluated two user-friendly, commercially available transcranial cerebral oximeters (TOS 96, Tostec, Tokyo, Japan and INVOS 3100, Somanetics, Troy, USA) for use in adults. We compared the absolute values (%) of regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2) from 108 measurements in 54 healthy volunteers (31 women, mean age 35.8 +/- 16.3 years and 23 men, mean age 35.4 +/- 9.2 years). The mean rSO2 values obtained by the TOS 96 and INVOS 3100 systems were 72.3 +/- 8.4 % and 72.6 +/- 7.2% respectively. Significant differences (p < 0.01) were found between females and males with the INVOS equipment. The study shows that anatomical (thickness of the skull) and technical (calibration) aspects have to be taken into consideration when interpreting absolute rSO2 values.
我们评估了两款便于使用的市售经颅脑氧饱和度仪(日本东京Tostec公司的TOS 96和美国特洛伊Somanetics公司的INVOS 3100)在成人中的使用情况。我们比较了54名健康志愿者(31名女性,平均年龄35.8±16.3岁;23名男性,平均年龄35.4±9.2岁)108次测量的局部脑氧饱和度(rSO2)绝对值(%)。TOS 96和INVOS 3100系统测得的平均rSO2值分别为72.3±8.4%和72.6±7.2%。使用INVOS设备时,女性和男性之间存在显著差异(p<0.01)。该研究表明,在解读rSO2绝对值时,必须考虑解剖学(颅骨厚度)和技术(校准)方面的因素。