Sherman S M, Guillery R W
Department of Neurobiology, State University of New York, Stony Brook, New York 11794-5230, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Jun 9;95(12):7121-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.12.7121.
When one nerve cell acts on another, its postsynaptic effect can vary greatly. In sensory systems, inputs from "drivers" can be differentiated from those of "modulators." The driver can be identified as the transmitter of receptive field properties; the modulator can be identified as altering the probability of certain aspects of that transmission. Where receptive fields are not available, the distinction is more difficult and currently is undefined. We use the visual pathways, particularly the thalamic geniculate relay for which much relevant evidence is available, to explore ways in which drivers can be distinguished from modulators. The extent to which the distinction may apply first to other parts of the thalamus and then, possibly, to other parts of the brain is considered. We suggest the following distinctions: Cross-correlograms from driver inputs have sharper peaks than those from modulators; there are likely to be few drivers but many modulators for any one cell; and drivers are likely to act only through ionotropic receptors having a fast postsynaptic effect whereas modulators also are likely to activate metabotropic receptors having a slow and prolonged postsynaptic effect.
当一个神经细胞作用于另一个神经细胞时,其突触后效应可能会有很大差异。在感觉系统中,“驱动者”的输入可以与“调制者”的输入区分开来。驱动者可被视为感受野特性的传递者;调制者可被视为改变该传递某些方面的概率。在没有感受野的情况下,这种区分更加困难,目前尚无定论。我们利用视觉通路,特别是丘脑膝状体中继,因为有很多相关证据,来探索区分驱动者和调制者的方法。还考虑了这种区分首先可能适用于丘脑其他部分,然后可能适用于大脑其他部分的程度。我们提出以下区分:来自驱动者输入的互相关图的峰值比来自调制者的更尖锐;对于任何一个细胞,驱动者可能很少,而调制者可能很多;并且驱动者可能仅通过具有快速突触后效应的离子型受体起作用,而调制者也可能激活具有缓慢且持久突触后效应的代谢型受体。