• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Nesbitt's Paradox resolved? Stress and arousal modulation during cigarette smoking.

作者信息

Parrott A C

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of East London, UK.

出版信息

Addiction. 1998 Jan;93(1):27-39. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1998.931274.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1360-0443.1998.931274.x
PMID:9624709
Abstract

Nesbitt's Paradox states that cigarette smoking generates physiological and psychological changes which are normally incompatible, namely increased arousal together with decreased stress. This review confirms these changes, but shows that they are dependent upon various factors, particularly the degree of nicotine deprivation. Thus the relaxant properties of smoking reflect the relief of irritability which develops between cigarettes. The deleterious mood effects of abstinence explain why smokers suffer more daily stress than non-smokers, and become less stressed when they quit smoking. Deprivation reversal also explains much of the arousal data, with deprived smokers being less vigilant and less alert than non-deprived smokers or non-smokers. Nicotine can, however, display genuine stimulant properties, although due to repeated abstinence effects the average arousal level of smokers is generally similar to non-smokers. Mood normalization also explains why nicotine is so addictive, with regular smokers needing nicotine just to "function" normally. Finally, Nesbitt's Paradox also assumes that arousal and emotionality are associated with each other. Yet factor analysis of mood and personality questionnaires shows that these two dimensions are statistically independent, with the stress and arousal changes during smoking also generally uncorrelated. Nesbitt's Paradox is therefore not actually a paradox; it never was a paradox.

摘要

相似文献

1
Nesbitt's Paradox resolved? Stress and arousal modulation during cigarette smoking.
Addiction. 1998 Jan;93(1):27-39. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1998.931274.x.
2
Cigarette smoking, physiological arousal, and emotional response: Nesbitt's paradox re-examined.吸烟、生理唤起与情绪反应:重新审视内斯比特悖论
Addict Behav. 1984;9(1):95-8. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(84)90012-1.
3
Stress modulation over the day in cigarette smokers.吸烟者一天中应激的调节情况。
Addiction. 1995 Feb;90(2):233-44. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1995.9022339.x.
4
Smoking cessation leads to reduced stress, but why?
Int J Addict. 1995 Sep;30(11):1509-16. doi: 10.3109/10826089509055846.
5
Daily uplifts, hassles, stresses and cognitive failures: in cigarette smokers, abstaining smokers, and non-smokers.日常振奋事件、烦心事、压力和认知失误:吸烟者、戒烟者和非吸烟者的情况
Behav Pharmacol. 1999 Nov;10(6-7):639-46. doi: 10.1097/00008877-199911000-00010.
6
Individual differences in stress and arousal during cigarette smoking.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1994 Jul;115(3):389-96. doi: 10.1007/BF02245082.
7
Explaining the stress-inducing effects of nicotine to cigarette smokers.向吸烟者解释尼古丁的压力诱导效应。
Hum Psychopharmacol. 2012 Mar;27(2):150-5. doi: 10.1002/hup.1247.
8
Cigarette-derived nicotine is not a medicine.香烟中的尼古丁并非药物。
World J Biol Psychiatry. 2003 Apr;4(2):49-55. doi: 10.3109/15622970309167951.
9
Stress and arousal in sedative and stimulant cigarette smokers.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1992;107(2-3):442-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02245173.
10
Electroencephalographic responses to photic stimulation in habitual smokers and nonsmokers.习惯性吸烟者与非吸烟者对光刺激的脑电图反应。
J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1977 Apr;91(2):418-22. doi: 10.1037/h0077333.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrated use of biofeedback and neurofeedback techniques in treating pathological conditions and improving performance: a narrative review.生物反馈和神经反馈技术在治疗病理状况及提高表现中的综合应用:一项叙述性综述
Front Neurosci. 2024 Mar 19;18:1358481. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1358481. eCollection 2024.
2
Does combined training of biofeedback and neurofeedback affect smoking status, behavior, and longitudinal brain plasticity?生物反馈与神经反馈的联合训练是否会影响吸烟状况、行为及大脑的纵向可塑性?
Front Behav Neurosci. 2023 Jan 27;17:1096122. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1096122. eCollection 2023.
3
Subjective reward processing and catechol-- methyltransferase Val158Met polymorphism as potential research domain criteria in addiction: A pilot study.
主观奖励加工与儿茶酚-O-甲基转移酶Val158Met多态性作为成瘾潜在研究领域标准的初步研究
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 14;13:992657. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.992657. eCollection 2022.
4
Differences in occupational stress by smoking intensity and gender in cross-sectional study of 59 355 Japanese employees using the Brief Job Stress Questionnaire (BJSQ): the Niigata Wellness Study.横断面研究使用《简明工作应激问卷》(BJSQ)对 59355 名日本员工的吸烟强度和性别与职业压力差异分析:新潟健康研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 8;12(4):e055577. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055577.
5
Cigarette use, anxiety, and insomnia from adolescence to early adulthood: A longitudinal indirect effects test.青少年期到成年早期的吸烟、焦虑和失眠:纵向间接效应检验。
Addict Behav. 2021 Sep;120:106981. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106981. Epub 2021 May 6.
6
Time-Varying Functional Connectivity Decreases as a Function of Acute Nicotine Abstinence.随急性尼古丁戒断时间变化,功能连接逐渐减弱。
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2021 Apr;6(4):459-469. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2020.10.004. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
7
Short Bouts of Physical Activity Are Associated with Reduced Smoking Withdrawal Symptoms, but Perceptions of Intensity May Be the Key.短时间的体育活动与吸烟戒断症状减轻有关,但对强度的认知可能是关键。
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Oct 23;8(4):425. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8040425.
8
Advances in biofeedback and neurofeedback studies on smoking.吸烟的生物反馈和神经反馈研究进展。
Neuroimage Clin. 2020;28:102397. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102397. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
9
Exploring the Neuroplastic Effects of Biofeedback Training on Smokers.探索生物反馈训练对吸烟者的神经可塑性影响。
Behav Neurol. 2018 Jul 29;2018:4876287. doi: 10.1155/2018/4876287. eCollection 2018.
10
Mood Fluctuation and Psychobiological Instability: The Same Core Functions Are Disrupted by Novel Psychoactive Substances and Established Recreational Drugs.情绪波动与心理生物学不稳定性:新型精神活性物质和传统娱乐性药物对相同核心功能造成破坏。
Brain Sci. 2018 Mar 13;8(3):43. doi: 10.3390/brainsci8030043.