Zhou X H
Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis 46202-5119, USA.
Biometrics. 1998 Jun;54(2):453-70.
To assess relative accuracies of two diagnostic tests, we often compare the areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of these two tests in a paired design. Standard methods for analyzing data from a paired design require that every patient tested has the known disease status. In practice, however, some of the patients with test results may not have verified disease status. Any analysis using only verified cases may result in verification bias. In this paper, we propose a verification bias correction procedure for comparing areas under ROC curves under the missing-at-random (MAR) assumption. We also develop an approach for testing the validity of the MAR assumption. Finally, we use the proposed method to compare the relative accuracies of MRI and CT in evaluation of pancreatic cancer.
为评估两种诊断测试的相对准确性,我们经常在配对设计中比较这两种测试的受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线下的面积。分析配对设计数据的标准方法要求每个接受测试的患者都有已知的疾病状态。然而,在实际中,一些有测试结果的患者可能没有经过核实的疾病状态。仅使用经核实的病例进行的任何分析都可能导致核实偏倚。在本文中,我们提出了一种在随机缺失(MAR)假设下比较ROC曲线下面积的核实偏倚校正程序。我们还开发了一种检验MAR假设有效性的方法。最后,我们使用所提出的方法比较MRI和CT在评估胰腺癌方面的相对准确性。