Diehl M, Elnick A B, Bourbeau L S, Labouvie-Vief G
Department of Psychology, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs 80933-7150, USA.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Jun;74(6):1656-69. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.74.6.1656.
This study used a sample of 304 adults to examine mean differences in family climate and personality variables on the basis of individuals' attachment styles. Also examined was whether mean differences varied by age group. Findings showed significant main effects of attachment style, but no Attachment Style x Age Group interactions. Compared with adults with an insecure attachment style, persons with a secure attachment style described their family of origin and their current family more positively and scored higher on personality variables indicative of self-confidence, psychological well-being, and functioning in the social world. When the family climate and personality variables were included in a discriminant function analysis, 2 significant functions were obtained. The 1st function discriminated adults with a positive self-model from those with a negative self-model. The 2nd function contrasted participants with a positive other-model from those with a negative other-model. Thus, this study provided evidence in support of the self- and other-models as the fundamental dimensions of adults' attachment system.
本研究以304名成年人作为样本,基于个体的依恋风格来考察家庭氛围和人格变量的平均差异。同时还考察了平均差异是否因年龄组而异。研究结果显示出依恋风格的显著主效应,但不存在依恋风格×年龄组的交互作用。与具有不安全依恋风格的成年人相比,具有安全依恋风格的人对其原生家庭和当前家庭的描述更为积极,并且在表明自信、心理健康和社交能力的人格变量上得分更高。当将家庭氛围和人格变量纳入判别函数分析时,得到了2个显著函数。第一个函数区分了具有积极自我模型的成年人与具有消极自我模型的成年人。第二个函数则将具有积极他人模型的参与者与具有消极他人模型的参与者进行了对比。因此,本研究为支持自我模型和他人模型作为成年人依恋系统的基本维度提供了证据。