• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者教育材料的可读性和理解度。

Readability and Comprehension of Printed Patient Education Materials.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Department of Behavioral Sciences, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.

Doctoral School of Health Sciences, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 30;9:725840. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.725840. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2021.725840
PMID:34917569
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8670754/
Abstract

Health literacy, a recently determined construct plays an important role in how individuals are able to manage their health. A useful approach for the assessment of health literacy is to measure the comprehension of available patient education materials (PEMs). We aimed at assessing the usefulness of PEMS available in Hungarian by testing comprehension of selected PEMs in different groups of users. Comprehension of patient education materials in the domain of healthcare was tested by selecting PEMs and creating questions based on their text in 3 dimensions of health literacy: understand, process/appraise, apply/use. Twenty questions were created that could be answered without pre-existing knowledge by reading the appropriate text taken from PEMs. Comprehension was examined in four groups: laypersons, non-professional healthcare workers, 1st year healthcare students, and 5th year medical students. Readability indices were calculated for the same texts to which questions were created. Laypersons answered <50% of the PEMs-based questions correctly. Non-professional healthcare workers performed better with 57% of right answers but significantly worse than healthcare students or medical students. Those with at least high school qualification (maturity exam) showed significantly higher comprehension compared to those with lower educational attainment. Persons in good or very good health also had significantly better comprehension than those in less favorable health. All readability indices showed that comprehension of the tested PEMs required at least 10 years of schooling or more. Therefore, these PEMS are difficult to understand for persons with less than high school level of education. Rephrasing of the investigated patient educational materials would be recommended so that they better fit the educational attainment of the Hungarian population. Evaluation of the readability and comprehensibility of other PEMs also seems warranted.

摘要

健康素养是一个最近确定的概念,它在个体管理自身健康的能力方面发挥着重要作用。评估健康素养的一个有用方法是测量对现有患者教育材料(PEM)的理解程度。我们旨在通过测试不同用户群体对选定 PEM 的理解来评估匈牙利可用 PEM 的有用性。通过选择 PEM 并根据其文本在健康素养的三个维度(理解、处理/评估、应用/使用)创建问题,来测试患者在医疗保健领域的教育材料的理解能力。创建了 20 个问题,这些问题可以通过阅读从 PEM 中提取的适当文本而无需先验知识来回答。在四个组中检查了理解能力:非专业人员、非专业医疗保健工作者、医疗保健专业一年级学生和医学专业五年级学生。为创建问题的同一文本计算了可读性指数。非专业人员正确回答的 PEM 相关问题不到 50%。非专业医疗保健工作者的表现更好,正确率为 57%,但明显不如医疗保健学生或医学生。那些至少具有高中资格(成熟考试)的人表现出的理解能力明显高于教育程度较低的人。健康状况良好或非常好的人在理解方面也明显优于健康状况较差的人。所有可读性指数都表明,测试的 PEM 的理解至少需要 10 年的学校教育或更多。因此,这些 PEM 对于教育程度低于高中的人来说理解起来很困难。建议对所调查的患者教育材料进行改写,使其更符合匈牙利人口的教育程度。评估其他 PEM 的可读性和可理解性似乎也是必要的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c97b/8670754/4513eb02315c/fpubh-09-725840-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c97b/8670754/4513eb02315c/fpubh-09-725840-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c97b/8670754/4513eb02315c/fpubh-09-725840-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Readability and Comprehension of Printed Patient Education Materials.患者教育材料的可读性和理解度。
Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 30;9:725840. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.725840. eCollection 2021.
2
Assessment of online patient education materials designed for people with age-related macular degeneration.针对年龄相关性黄斑变性患者设计的在线患者教育材料评估。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct 2;20(1):391. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01664-x.
3
Readability assessment of online gynecologic oncology patient education materials from major governmental, non-profit and pharmaceutical organizations.主要政府、非营利组织和制药机构的在线妇科肿瘤患者教育材料的可读性评估。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Sep;154(3):616-621. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.06.026. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
4
A READABILITY COMPARISON OF ONLINE SPANISH AND ENGLISH PATIENT EDUCATION MATERIALS ABOUT VISION HEALTH.在线西班牙语和英语视力健康患者教育材料的可读性比较。
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2022 Apr;29(2):182-188. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2021.1910316. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
5
Readability of Patient Education Materials in Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review.头颈癌患者教育材料的可读性:一项系统综述
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Aug 1;150(8):713-724. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2024.1569.
6
Readability of patient education materials available at the point of care.可在护理点获得的患者教育材料的可读性。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Sep;27(9):1165-70. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2046-0. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
7
Assessment of the Readability of Online Patient Education Material from Major Geriatric Associations.评估主要老年病学协会在线患者教育材料的可读性。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Apr;69(4):1051-1056. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16960. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
8
Readability assessment of Internet-based patient education materials related to endoscopic sinus surgery.基于互联网的内镜鼻窦手术相关患者教育资料的可读性评估。
Laryngoscope. 2012 Aug;122(8):1649-54. doi: 10.1002/lary.23309. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
9
Assessing the Readability of Online Patient Education Resources Related to Neophallus Reconstruction.评估与新阴茎重建相关的在线患者教育资源的可读性。
J Surg Res. 2023 Nov;291:296-302. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.06.012. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
10
How readable are Australian multilingual diabetes patient education materials? An evaluation of national English-language source texts.澳大利亚的多语言糖尿病患者教育材料可读性如何?对国家英语源文本的评估。
Public Health Res Pract. 2020 Mar 10;30(1):3012002. doi: 10.17061/phrp3012002.

引用本文的文献

1
Readability of Informed Consent Forms for Medical and Surgical Clinical Procedures: A Systematic Review.医疗和外科临床操作知情同意书的可读性:一项系统评价
Clin Pract. 2025 Jan 24;15(2):26. doi: 10.3390/clinpract15020026.
2
Enhancing Patient Education on Cardiovascular Rehabilitation with Large Language Models.利用大语言模型加强心血管康复患者教育
Mo Med. 2025 Jan-Feb;122(1):67-71.
3
An infodemiologic review of internet resources on dental hypersensitivity: A quality and readability assessment.关于牙齿过敏症互联网资源的信息流行病学综述:质量与可读性评估

本文引用的文献

1
Readability of online patient education material for the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19): a cross-sectional health literacy study.新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)在线患者教育材料的易读性:一项横断面健康素养研究。
Public Health. 2020 Aug;185:21-25. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.05.041. Epub 2020 May 30.
2
Health mediators as members of multidisciplinary group practice: lessons learned from a primary health care model programme in Hungary.健康调解员作为多学科团队实践的成员:来自匈牙利初级保健模式方案的经验教训。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Jan 28;21(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-1092-7.
3
Discrepancy Between Patient Health Literacy Levels and Readability of Patient Education Materials from an Electronic Health Record.
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 24;20(1):e0312832. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312832. eCollection 2025.
4
De novo generation of colorectal patient educational materials using large language models: Prompt engineering key to improved readability.使用大语言模型从头生成结直肠癌患者教育材料:提示工程是提高可读性的关键。
Surgery. 2025 Apr;180:109024. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.109024. Epub 2025 Jan 4.
5
Leveraging Generative Artificial Intelligence Models in Patient Education on Inferior Vena Cava Filters.在下肢静脉滤器患者教育中利用生成式人工智能模型
Clin Pract. 2024 Jul 30;14(4):1507-1514. doi: 10.3390/clinpract14040121.
6
Evaluation of the Quality and Readability of Web-Based Information Regarding Foreign Bodies of the Ear, Nose, and Throat: Qualitative Content Analysis.关于耳鼻咽喉异物的网络信息的质量和可读性评估:定性内容分析
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Aug 15;8:e55535. doi: 10.2196/55535.
7
Readability and Quality of Online Patient Education Materials Concerning Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.关于后交叉韧带重建的在线患者教育材料的可读性和质量
Cureus. 2024 Apr 19;16(4):e58618. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58618. eCollection 2024 Apr.
8
The Readability and Quality of Web-Based Patient Information on Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Quantitative Content Analysis.基于网络的鼻咽癌患者信息的可读性与质量:定量内容分析
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Nov 27;7:e47762. doi: 10.2196/47762.
患者健康素养水平与电子健康记录中患者教育材料可读性之间的差异
Health Lit Res Pract. 2017 Nov 9;1(4):e203-e207. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20170918-01. eCollection 2017 Oct.
4
Availability and readability of patient education materials for deprescribing: An environmental scan.药物减量患者教育材料的可及性和可读性:环境扫描。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Jul;85(7):1396-1406. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13912. Epub 2019 May 7.
5
Assessing the readability and patient comprehension of rheumatology medicine information sheets: a cross-sectional Health Literacy Study.评估风湿病医学信息单的可读性和患者理解度:一项横断面健康素养研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 5;9(2):e024582. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024582.
6
Assessment Tools for Health Literacy among the General Population: A Systematic Review.人群健康素养评估工具:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Aug 10;15(8):1711. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15081711.
7
Readability Assessment of Online Patient Education Material on Congestive Heart Failure.充血性心力衰竭在线患者教育材料的可读性评估
Adv Prev Med. 2017;2017:9780317. doi: 10.1155/2017/9780317. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
8
Readability of Patient Education Materials in Hand Surgery and Health Literacy Best Practices for Improvement.手外科患者教育材料的可读性及改善健康素养的最佳实践
J Hand Surg Am. 2016 Aug;41(8):825-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.05.006. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
9
Patient Education Materials in Dermatology: Addressing the Health Literacy Needs of Patients.皮肤科患者教育材料:满足患者的健康素养需求
JAMA Dermatol. 2016 Aug 1;152(8):946-7. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.1135.
10
Health literacy in Europe: comparative results of the European health literacy survey (HLS-EU).欧洲的健康素养:欧洲健康素养调查(HLS-EU)的比较结果。
Eur J Public Health. 2015 Dec;25(6):1053-8. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckv043. Epub 2015 Apr 5.