Brathwaite C E, Rosko M, McDowell R, Gallagher J, Proenca J, Spott M A
Crozer-Chester Medical Center, Upland, Pennsylvania 19013-3995, USA.
J Trauma. 1998 Jul;45(1):140-4; discussion 144-6. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199807000-00029.
Recently, questions have been raised regarding the effectiveness of helicopters in trauma care. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the effect of on-scene helicopter transport on survival after trauma in a statewide trauma system.
Data were obtained from a statewide trauma registry of 162,730 patients treated at 28 accredited trauma centers. Patients transported from the scene by helicopter (15,938) were compared with those transported by ground with advanced life support (ALS) (6,473). Interhospital transfers and transports without ALS were excluded. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance and logistic regression.
Patients transported by helicopter were significantly (p < 0.01) younger, were more seriously injured, and had lower blood pressure. They were also more likely to be male and to have systolic blood pressure < 90 mm Hg. Logistic regression analysis revealed that when adjusting for other risk factors, transportation by helicopter did not affect the estimated odds of survival.
A reappraisal of the cost-effectiveness of helicopter triage and transport criteria, when access to ground ALS squads is available, may be warranted.
最近,关于直升机在创伤救治中的有效性出现了一些问题。我们进行了一项回顾性研究,以评估在全州创伤系统中现场直升机转运对创伤后存活情况的影响。
数据取自全州28家认可的创伤中心治疗的162,730例患者的创伤登记处。将通过直升机从现场转运的患者(15,938例)与通过地面高级生命支持(ALS)转运的患者(6,473例)进行比较。排除院间转运和无ALS的转运情况。使用单因素方差分析和逻辑回归进行统计分析。
通过直升机转运的患者明显(p < 0.01)更年轻,受伤更严重,血压更低。他们也更可能为男性且收缩压 < 90 mmHg。逻辑回归分析显示,在调整其他风险因素后,直升机转运并不影响估计的存活几率。
当有地面ALS小组可用时,可能有必要重新评估直升机分诊和转运标准的成本效益。