Suppr超能文献

连枷胸的手术胸壁稳定术——有无肺挫伤患者的结局

Operative chest wall stabilization in flail chest--outcomes of patients with or without pulmonary contusion.

作者信息

Voggenreiter G, Neudeck F, Aufmkolk M, Obertacke U, Schmit-Neuerburg K P

机构信息

Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Germany.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 1998 Aug;187(2):130-8. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(98)00142-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of operative chest wall stabilization in patients with flail chest and respiratory insufficiency is to reduce ventilator time and avoid ventilator associated complications. The purpose of this retrospective study was to analyze the indications and outcomes of operative chest wall stabilization in defined groups of patients sustaining flail chest with and without pulmonary contusion.

METHODS

The hospital records of 405 patients with multiple trauma (Injury Severity Score > 17) between 1988 and 1994 were reviewed. Forty-two patients sustained flail chest. Twenty of these underwent operative chest wall stabilization for the following indications: 1) flail chest with indication for thoracotomy due to intrathoracic injury (n = 6); 2) flail chest without pulmonary contusion (n = 9); 3) paradoxical movement of a chest wall segment in the weaning period from the respirator (n = 3); and 4) severe deformity of the chest wall (n = 2). For the purpose of analysis the patients were separated into groups: group 1: operative chest wall stabilization in flail chest without pulmonary contusion (n = 10); group 2: operative chest wall stabilization in flail chest with pulmonary contusion (n = 10); group 3: flail chest without pulmonary contusion and without chest wall stabilization (n = 18); group 4: flail chest with pulmonary contusion and without chest wall stabilization (n = 4). Data were coded for time of operation, duration of ventilatory support, and complications.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in age, severity of injury, and extent of injury between groups 1, 2, and 3 (p < 0.42). Group 4 was excluded for statistical analysis because of the small number of patients. Patients in group 1 required a shorter ventilatory support time compared to patients in group 3 (6.5+/-7.0 versus 26.7+/-29.0 days) and group 2 (p < 0.02). In group 2 (ventilator time 30.8+/-33.7 days) early extubation was only possible in patients being operated on for chest wall instability during weaning from the ventilator. One patient in group 1, three patients in group 2 and five patients in group 3 developed pneumonia with further disturbance of gas exchange. All patients in group 1 survived; deaths in group 2 were attributed to massive hemorrhage in two and septic multiorgan failure in one patient. Four patients in group 3 died of head injury, one of acute respiratory distress syndrome, one of severe hemorrhage, and one of multiple organ failure.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with flail chest and respiratory insufficiency without pulmonary contusion, operative chest wall stabilization permits early extubation. Patients with pulmonary contusion do not benefit from chest wall stabilization. Secondary operative chest wall stabilization in these patients is indicated when progressive collapse of the chest wall is evident during weaning from the ventilator.

摘要

背景

连枷胸合并呼吸功能不全患者进行胸壁稳定手术的目的是缩短机械通气时间并避免呼吸机相关并发症。本回顾性研究的目的是分析在有和无肺挫伤的特定连枷胸患者组中进行胸壁稳定手术的指征和结果。

方法

回顾了1988年至1994年间405例多发伤(损伤严重度评分>17)患者的医院记录。42例患者发生连枷胸。其中20例因以下指征接受胸壁稳定手术:1)因胸内损伤有开胸指征的连枷胸(n = 6);2)无肺挫伤的连枷胸(n = 9);3)脱机期间胸壁节段反常运动(n = 3);4)胸壁严重畸形(n = 2)。为便于分析,将患者分为几组:第1组:无肺挫伤的连枷胸行胸壁稳定手术(n = 10);第2组:有肺挫伤的连枷胸行胸壁稳定手术(n = 10);第3组:无肺挫伤且未行胸壁稳定手术的连枷胸(n = 18);第4组:有肺挫伤且未行胸壁稳定手术的连枷胸(n = 4)。对手术时间、机械通气支持时间和并发症数据进行编码。

结果

第1、2和3组在年龄、损伤严重程度和损伤范围方面无显著差异(p < 0.42)。第4组因患者数量少而未纳入统计分析。与第3组(6.5±7.0天对26.7±29.0天)和第2组相比,第1组患者所需机械通气支持时间更短(p < 0.02)。在第2组(机械通气时间30.8±33.7天)中,仅在脱机期间因胸壁不稳定而接受手术的患者能够早期拔管。第1组1例、第2组3例和第3组5例患者发生肺炎并伴有气体交换进一步障碍。第1组所有患者存活;第2组2例死于大出血,1例死于感染性多器官功能衰竭。第3组4例死于颅脑损伤,1例死于急性呼吸窘迫综合征,1例死于严重出血,1例死于多器官功能衰竭。

结论

对于无肺挫伤的连枷胸合并呼吸功能不全患者,胸壁稳定手术可实现早期拔管。有肺挫伤的患者不能从胸壁稳定手术中获益。当这些患者在脱机期间胸壁明显进行性塌陷时,提示需二期行胸壁稳定手术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验