• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷(QLQ-C30)作为乳腺癌患者心理社会功能衡量指标的验证

Validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) as a measure of psychosocial function in breast cancer patients.

作者信息

McLachlan S A, Devins G M, Goodwin P J

机构信息

Department of Oncology, St Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 1998 Mar;34(4):510-7. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(97)10076-4.

DOI:10.1016/s0959-8049(97)10076-4
PMID:9713301
Abstract

The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30 has been developed as a quantitative measure of health-related quality of life for use in clinical trials of cancer patients. Validity is an important measurement property of all scientific tests. This study contributes to the iterative process of validating the questionnaire by focusing on the psychosocial subscales of the QLQ-C30, using baseline data from 150 patients participating in a randomised trial of supportive group therapy for metastatic breast cancer. The results provide strong support for the discriminative validity of the global health/quality of life, role function and social function subscales of the QLQ-C30, in patients differing according to clinical criteria. The psychosocial focus of the trial enabled expansion of criteria used to form patient subgroups, beyond medical factors, and consequently support was demonstrated for the discriminative validity of the emotional and cognitive function subscales. The degree of support for these subscales was less substantial than for the other QLQ-C30 subscales as there were fewer relevant criteria. Convergence assessed by correlations with independent measures of psychosocial function provides strong support for the convergent validity of the emotional function, role function and global health/quality of life subscales of the QLQ-C30, and moderate support for the social function subscales. There was little opportunity for the cognitive function subscale to associate with conceptually analogous subscales. Further testing is recommended with more comprehensive and specific measures of cognitive status. In general, the psychosocial subscales of the QLQ-C30 appear to be measuring the concepts they are purported to measure.

摘要

欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)生活质量问卷QLQ-C30已被开发出来,作为一种用于癌症患者临床试验的与健康相关生活质量的定量测量工具。效度是所有科学测试的一项重要测量属性。本研究通过关注QLQ-C30的心理社会子量表,利用150名参与转移性乳腺癌支持性团体治疗随机试验患者的基线数据,为问卷验证的迭代过程做出了贡献。结果为QLQ-C30的总体健康/生活质量、角色功能和社会功能子量表在根据临床标准不同的患者中的区分效度提供了有力支持。该试验的心理社会重点使得用于形成患者亚组的标准得以扩展,超越了医学因素,因此也证明了情感和认知功能子量表的区分效度。对这些子量表的支持程度不如对其他QLQ-C30子量表那么充分,因为相关标准较少。通过与心理社会功能独立测量指标的相关性评估的收敛性,为QLQ-C30的情感功能、角色功能和总体健康/生活质量子量表的收敛效度提供了有力支持,为社会功能子量表提供了适度支持。认知功能子量表几乎没有机会与概念上类似的子量表相关联。建议使用更全面和具体的认知状态测量方法进行进一步测试。总体而言,QLQ-C30的心理社会子量表似乎在测量它们旨在测量的概念。

相似文献

1
Validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) as a measure of psychosocial function in breast cancer patients.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷(QLQ-C30)作为乳腺癌患者心理社会功能衡量指标的验证
Eur J Cancer. 1998 Mar;34(4):510-7. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(97)10076-4.
2
Comparison of two quality-of-life instruments for cancer patients: the functional assessment of cancer therapy-general and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30.两种癌症患者生活质量评估工具的比较:癌症治疗功能评估通用版与欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷-C30。
J Clin Oncol. 1999 Sep;17(9):2932-40. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.9.2932.
3
Psychometric properties and measurement equivalence of the Multidimensional Fatigue Syndrome Inventory- Short Form (MFSI-SF) amongst breast cancer and lymphoma patients in Singapore.新加坡乳腺癌和淋巴瘤患者多维疲劳综合征量表-简表(MFSI-SF)的心理测量特性和测量等效性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Jan 19;16(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0846-6.
4
Validating and improving the reliability of the EORTC qlq-c30 using a multidimensional Rasch model.采用多维 Rasch 模型验证和改进 EORTC qlq-c30 的可靠性。
Value Health. 2013 Jul-Aug;16(5):848-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.05.004. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
5
Validity of the Greek EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 for measuring health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients.希腊 EORTC QLQ-C30 和 QLQ-BR23 量表用于测量乳腺癌患者健康相关生活质量的有效性。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2011 May;20(3):354-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2009.01170.x.
6
Psychometric properties and responsiveness of the EORTC quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in patients with breast, ovarian and lung cancer.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷(QLQ-C30)在乳腺癌、卵巢癌和肺癌患者中的心理测量特性及反应性
Qual Life Res. 1994 Oct;3(5):353-64. doi: 10.1007/BF00451727.
7
Validation of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 Summary Score in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies.验证欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷核心 30 总分为血液恶性肿瘤患者的适用性。
Value Health. 2019 Nov;22(11):1303-1310. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.06.004. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
8
Validity and reliability of the Swedish version of the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS): an instrument for the evaluation of symptom prevalence, characteristics, and distress.《纪念症状评估量表(MSAS)瑞典语版的有效性和可靠性:用于评估症状发生率、特征和痛苦的工具》。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Jul;46(1):131-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.07.023. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
9
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: an examination into the cultural validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the EORTC QLQ-C30.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织QLQ-C30:对欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织QLQ-C30土耳其语版本的文化效度和信度的考察。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2004 May;13(2):135-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2003.00435.x.
10
Validation of the Turkish versions of EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR23 modules in breast cancer patients.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)QLQ-C30和BR23模块土耳其语版本在乳腺癌患者中的验证
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2011;12(5):1283-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Breast conserving surgery versus mastectomy: the effect of surgery on quality of life in breast cancer survivors in Malaysia.保乳手术与乳房切除术:手术对马来西亚乳腺癌幸存者生活质量的影响。
BMC Womens Health. 2023 Nov 16;23(1):607. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02738-w.
2
Psychometric properties of Quality-of-Life Index for Vietnamese women with breast cancer three weeks postmastectomy.越南乳腺癌女性乳房切除术后三周生活质量指数的心理测量学特性。
Belitung Nurs J. 2021 Jun 28;7(3):235-245. doi: 10.33546/bnj.1332. eCollection 2021.
3
Study protocol for two pilot randomised controlled trials aimed at increasing physical activity using electrically assisted bicycles to enhance prostate or breast cancer survival.
两项试点随机对照试验的研究方案,旨在通过电动助力自行车增加身体活动,以提高前列腺癌或乳腺癌患者的生存率。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023 Apr 24;9(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s40814-023-01293-3.
4
Breast Cancer: How Hippotherapy Bridges the Gap between Healing and Recovery-A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.乳腺癌:马术疗法如何弥合治愈与康复之间的差距——一项随机对照临床试验
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Feb 19;15(4):1317. doi: 10.3390/cancers15041317.
5
Quality of Life After Partial or Whole-Breast Irradiation in Breast-Conserving Therapy for Low-Risk Breast Cancer: 1-Year Results of a Phase 2 Randomized Controlled Trial.低危乳腺癌保乳治疗中部分或全乳照射后的生活质量:一项2期随机对照试验的1年结果
Front Oncol. 2021 Sep 15;11:738318. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.738318. eCollection 2021.
6
The impact of chronic comorbidities at the time of breast cancer diagnosis on quality of life, and emotional health following treatment in Canada.加拿大在诊断乳腺癌时患有慢性合并症对生活质量和治疗后心理健康的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 26;16(8):e0256536. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256536. eCollection 2021.
7
Measuring Quality of Life Using Patient-Reported Outcomes in Real-World Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients: The Need for a Standardized Approach.在真实世界的转移性乳腺癌患者中使用患者报告结局来衡量生活质量:对标准化方法的需求
Cancers (Basel). 2021 May 12;13(10):2308. doi: 10.3390/cancers13102308.
8
Quality of life among head and neck cancer treated patients in South India: A cross-sectional study.印度南部头颈癌患者的生活质量:一项横断面研究。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2021 Apr-Jun;11(2):215-218. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2021.02.002. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
9
Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Health-Related Quality of Life (HR-QoL) in Patients with Ovarian Cancer: What Is Different Compared to Healthy Women?卵巢癌患者的患者报告结局(PROs)和健康相关生活质量(HR-QoL):与健康女性相比有何不同?
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Feb 5;13(4):631. doi: 10.3390/cancers13040631.
10
Home-Based Physical Activity in Patients With Breast Cancer: During and/or After Chemotherapy? Impact on Cardiorespiratory Fitness. A 3-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial (APAC).乳腺癌患者的居家体育活动:化疗期间和/或化疗后?对心肺适能的影响。一项三臂随机对照试验(APAC)
Integr Cancer Ther. 2020 Jan-Dec;19:1534735420969818. doi: 10.1177/1534735420969818.