• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷核心 30 总分为血液恶性肿瘤患者的适用性。

Validation of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 Summary Score in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies.

机构信息

Italian Group for Adult Hematologic Diseases, Data Center and Health Outcomes Research Unit, Rome, Italy.

Italian Group for Adult Hematologic Diseases, Data Center and Health Outcomes Research Unit, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Value Health. 2019 Nov;22(11):1303-1310. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.06.004. Epub 2019 Aug 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2019.06.004
PMID:31708068
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the validity of the recently developed European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) summary score in patients with hematologic malignancies. Specifically, we evaluated the adequacy of a single-factor measurement model for the QLQ-C30, and its known-groups validity and responsiveness to change over time.

METHODS

We used confirmatory factor analysis to test the single-factor model of the QLQ-C30, using baseline QLQ-C30 data (N = 2134). The QLQ-C30 summary score was compared to the original QLQ-C30 scales using general (age, sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, comorbidity) and disease-specific (red blood cell transfusion dependency) groups. Repeated measurements allowed us to investigate responsiveness to change in a subgroup of patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

RESULTS

The single-factor model of the QLQ-C30 exhibited adequate fit in patients with hematologic malignancies. Known-group comparisons generally supported the construct validity of the summary score when using more general grouping variables (sociodemographics, broad clinical parameters). Nevertheless, when groups were formed on the basis of disease-specific variables (eg, transfusion dependency), the summary score performed less well the some of the original, separate scales of the QLQ-C30.

CONCLUSION

Our findings provide support for the validity of the single-factor model of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in patients with hematologic malignancies. Specifically, the results suggest that the summary score can be used as an endpoint in this population when symptom- or other health domain-specific hypotheses are not available.

摘要

目的

我们旨在调查欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)生活质量问卷核心 30 量表(EORTC QLQ-C30)总评分在血液恶性肿瘤患者中的有效性。具体而言,我们评估了 EORTC QLQ-C30 单因素测量模型的充分性,以及其已知群组的有效性和对随时间变化的反应性。

方法

我们使用验证性因子分析来测试 EORTC QLQ-C30 的单因素模型,使用基线 EORTC QLQ-C30 数据(N=2134)。通过一般(年龄、性别、东部肿瘤协作组体能状态、合并症)和疾病特异性(红细胞输血依赖性)群组,将 EORTC QLQ-C30 总评分与原始 EORTC QLQ-C30 量表进行比较。重复测量允许我们在急性髓细胞白血病患者亚组中调查对变化的反应性。

结果

EORTC QLQ-C30 的单因素模型在血液恶性肿瘤患者中表现出足够的拟合度。当使用更一般的分组变量(社会人口统计学、广泛的临床参数)时,已知群组的比较通常支持总评分的结构有效性。然而,当根据疾病特异性变量(例如输血依赖性)分组时,总评分在一些 EORTC QLQ-C30 的原始、独立量表上的表现不如某些量表。

结论

我们的研究结果为 EORTC QLQ-C30 的单因素模型在血液恶性肿瘤患者中的有效性提供了支持。具体而言,结果表明,当不存在症状或其他健康领域特定的假设时,该评分可作为该人群的终点。

相似文献

1
Validation of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 Summary Score in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies.验证欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷核心 30 总分为血液恶性肿瘤患者的适用性。
Value Health. 2019 Nov;22(11):1303-1310. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.06.004. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
2
Consistency matters: measurement invariance of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire in patients with hematologic malignancies.一致性很重要:EORTC QLQ-C30 问卷在血液恶性肿瘤患者中的测量不变性。
Qual Life Res. 2020 Mar;29(3):815-823. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02369-5. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
3
Replication and validation of higher order models demonstrated that a summary score for the EORTC QLQ-C30 is robust.高阶模型的复制与验证表明,欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量核心问卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)的综合得分是可靠的。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jan;69:79-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.007. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
4
General population normative data for the EORTC QLQ-C30 health-related quality of life questionnaire based on 15,386 persons across 13 European countries, Canada and the Unites States.基于 13 个欧洲国家、加拿大和美国的 15386 人,为 EORTC QLQ-C30 健康相关生活质量问卷制定的普通人群常模数据。
Eur J Cancer. 2019 Jan;107:153-163. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.11.024. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
5
International validation of the EORTC CAT Core: a new adaptive instrument for measuring core quality of life domains in cancer.EORTC CAT 核心量表的国际验证:一种新的自适应工具,用于测量癌症患者核心生活质量领域。
Qual Life Res. 2020 May;29(5):1405-1417. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02421-9. Epub 2020 Jan 18.
6
Psychometric properties of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in Uganda.《EORTC QLQ-C30 在乌干达的心理测量特性》。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Apr 23;19(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01769-x.
7
Assessment of change of quality of life in terminally ill patients under cancer pain management using the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in a Korean sample.使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心生活质量问卷(QLQ-C30)对韩国样本中接受癌症疼痛管理的晚期患者的生活质量变化进行评估。
Oncology. 2008;74 Suppl 1:7-12. doi: 10.1159/000143212. Epub 2008 Aug 28.
8
Validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) as a measure of psychosocial function in breast cancer patients.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷(QLQ-C30)作为乳腺癌患者心理社会功能衡量指标的验证
Eur J Cancer. 1998 Mar;34(4):510-7. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(97)10076-4.
9
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织QLQ-C30:一种用于肿瘤学国际临床试验的生活质量评估工具。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365-76. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.5.365.
10
The EORTC QLQ-C30 Summary Score as Prognostic Factor for Survival of Patients with Cancer in the "Real-World": Results from the Population-Based PROFILES Registry.EORTC QLQ-C30 总评分作为“真实世界”中癌症患者生存预后因素:基于人群的 PROFILES 登记研究结果。
Oncologist. 2020 Apr;25(4):e722-e732. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0348. Epub 2019 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of stress and coping strategies on quality of life in hematological malignancies: A cross-sectional study.应激与应对策略对血液系统恶性肿瘤患者生活质量的影响:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 8;20(9):e0331865. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331865. eCollection 2025.
2
General population normative values for the EORTC QLQ-C30 by age, sex, and health condition for the French general population.一般人群 EORTC QLQ-C30 量表的常模值,按年龄、性别和健康状况分组,针对法国一般人群。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 May 2;8(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00719-7.
3
Health-related quality of life and quality-adjusted progression free survival for carfilzomib and dexamethasone maintenance following salvage autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma: a randomized phase 2 trial by the Nordic Myeloma Study Group.
多发性骨髓瘤患者挽救性自体干细胞移植后使用卡非佐米和地塞米松维持治疗的健康相关生活质量及质量调整无进展生存期:北欧骨髓瘤研究组的一项随机2期试验
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Feb 5;8(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00691-2.
4
Evaluating a shared care pathway intervention for people receiving chemotherapy to reduce post-treatment unplanned hospital presentations: a randomised controlled trial.评估针对接受化疗的人群的共同照护路径干预措施,以减少治疗后非计划性医院就诊:一项随机对照试验。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Jan 3;32(1):77. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-08261-w.
5
Financial Toxicity in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies: a Review and Need for Interventions.血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的财务毒性:综述与干预需求。
Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2023 Oct;18(5):158-166. doi: 10.1007/s11899-023-00707-6. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
6
Assessment tools for patient-reported outcomes in multiple myeloma.多发性骨髓瘤患者报告结局评估工具。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Jun 30;31(7):431. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07902-4.
7
Quality of care and quality of life as experienced by patients with advanced cancer of a rare tumour type: results of the multicentre observational eQuiPe study.晚期罕见肿瘤类型癌症患者的护理质量和生活质量:多中心观察性 eQuiPe 研究的结果。
J Cancer Surviv. 2023 Aug;17(4):997-1007. doi: 10.1007/s11764-022-01323-8. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
8
EORTC QLQ-C30 general population normative data for Italy by sex, age and health condition: an analysis of 1,036 individuals.EORTC QLQ-C30 普通人群意大利人群的性别、年龄和健康状况的常模数据:对 1036 个人的分析。
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 24;22(1):1040. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13211-y.
9
Impact of the Extent of Thyroidectomy on Quality of Life in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Survivors: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.甲状腺切除术范围对分化型甲状腺癌幸存者生活质量的影响:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Cancer Manag Res. 2021 Sep 7;13:6953-6967. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S321988. eCollection 2021.
10
The GIMEMA-ALLIANCE Digital Health Platform for Patients With Hematologic Malignancies in the COVID-19 Pandemic and Postpandemic Era: Protocol for a Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Study.GIMEMA联盟在COVID-19大流行和大流行后时代为血液系统恶性肿瘤患者提供的数字健康平台:一项多中心、前瞻性、观察性研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Jun 1;10(6):e25271. doi: 10.2196/25271.