• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床使用和人工清洗后在软性胃肠内窥镜上检测到的自然生物负载水平。

Natural bioburden levels detected on flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes after clinical use and manual cleaning.

作者信息

Chu N S, McAlister D, Antonoplos P A

机构信息

Advanced Sterilization Products, Irvine, California 92618-9824, USA.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 1998 Aug;48(2):137-42. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(98)70154-3.

DOI:10.1016/s0016-5107(98)70154-3
PMID:9717778
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Colonoscopes present a special bacterial decontamination challenge because the colon has a large and diverse microbial population.

METHODS

Bioburden of colonoscope insertion tube surfaces and suction channels were determined after use and after manual cleaning.

RESULTS

After use bioburden in suction channels averaged 7.0 x 10(9) colony-forming units (cfu). Cleaning reduced this level to 1.3 x 10(5). Cleaning of tube surfaces reduced the after-use bioburden from a level of 5.1 x 10(5) to 2.2 x 10(4) cfu. Gram-negative rods accounted for approximately 99% of the bioburden within the suction channel after use and after cleaning. After use flora were predominantly Escherichia coli and Bacteroides. The flora shifted to waterborne Pseudomonas organisms, and other members of the family Enterobacteriaceae after cleaning. Gram-positive bacteria were the primary isolates from the device surfaces both after use (56%) and after cleaning (47%). Because gram-positive cocci and diphtheroids are a part of the normal microbiota of the skin, these bacteria may have been introduced by the hospital environment or by handling.

CONCLUSIONS

After the cleaning of in-use colonoscopes, fewer than 10(6) vegetative bacteria could be recovered. This value is several logs lower than some previous estimates. This finding may be useful in the formulation of sterilization and disinfection cycles. Microflora from the colonoscopes indicated that the cleaning process introduced waterborne and enteric microorganisms, which highlights the importance of sanitation in the device reprocessing area.

摘要

背景

由于结肠拥有大量且多样的微生物群落,结肠镜的细菌去污面临特殊挑战。

方法

在使用后及人工清洗后,测定结肠镜插入管表面和吸引通道的生物负荷。

结果

使用后,吸引通道中的生物负荷平均为7.0×10⁹菌落形成单位(cfu)。清洗后该水平降至1.3×10⁵。管表面的清洗使使用后的生物负荷从5.1×10⁵cfu降至2.2×10⁴cfu。使用后及清洗后,革兰氏阴性杆菌约占吸引通道内生物负荷的99%。使用后菌群主要为大肠杆菌和拟杆菌。清洗后,菌群转变为水生假单胞菌属生物以及肠杆菌科的其他成员。革兰氏阳性菌是使用后(56%)和清洗后(47%)器械表面的主要分离菌。由于革兰氏阳性球菌和类白喉杆菌是皮肤正常微生物群的一部分,这些细菌可能是由医院环境或操作引入的。

结论

使用后的结肠镜清洗后,回收的活菌数少于10⁶。该数值比之前的一些估计低几个对数级。这一发现可能有助于制定灭菌和消毒周期。结肠镜的微生物群落表明,清洗过程引入了水生和肠道微生物,这凸显了器械再处理区域卫生的重要性。

相似文献

1
Natural bioburden levels detected on flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes after clinical use and manual cleaning.临床使用和人工清洗后在软性胃肠内窥镜上检测到的自然生物负载水平。
Gastrointest Endosc. 1998 Aug;48(2):137-42. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(98)70154-3.
2
Worst-case soiling levels for patient-used flexible endoscopes before and after cleaning.患者使用的软性内窥镜清洁前后的最坏污染水平。
Am J Infect Control. 1999 Oct;27(5):392-401. doi: 10.1016/s0196-6553(99)70004-0.
3
Contamination of single-use biopsy forceps: a prospective in vitro analysis.一次性活检钳的污染:一项前瞻性体外分析。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 Aug;56(2):209-12. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(02)70179-x.
4
Microbial bioburden in endoscope reprocessing and an in-use evaluation of the high-level disinfection capabilities of Cidex PA.内窥镜再处理中的微生物生物负荷以及戊二醛(Cidex PA)高水平消毒能力的使用中评估。
Gastroenterol Nurs. 1999 Mar-Apr;22(2):63-8. doi: 10.1097/00001610-199903000-00007.
5
Efficacy of a simplified lower gastrointestinal flexible endoscope cleaning method.一种简化的下消化道软性内窥镜清洗方法的效果
Dis Colon Rectum. 1985 Sep;28(9):653-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02553442.
6
Microbiologic profile of flexible endoscope disinfection in two Brazilian hospitals.巴西两家医院软性内窥镜消毒的微生物学概况
Arq Gastroenterol. 2006 Oct-Dec;43(4):255-8. doi: 10.1590/s0004-28032006000400002.
7
Reprocessing endoscopes: United States perspective.内镜再处理:美国视角
J Hosp Infect. 2004 Apr;56 Suppl 2:S27-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2003.12.035.
8
Comparison of clinically relevant benchmarks and channel sampling methods used to assess manual cleaning compliance for flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes.比较用于评估软性胃肠道内镜手动清洗依从性的临床相关基准和通道采样方法。
Am J Infect Control. 2014 Jan;42(1):e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2013.08.007.
9
Natural bioburden levels detected on rigid lumened medical devices before and after cleaning.清洁前后在刚性内腔医疗器械上检测到的自然生物负载水平。
Am J Infect Control. 1997 Dec;25(6):471-6. doi: 10.1016/s0196-6553(97)90070-5.
10
EVOTECH endoscope cleaner and reprocessor (ECR) simulated-use and clinical-use evaluation of cleaning efficacy.易伟特内镜清洗消毒机(ECR)模拟使用和临床使用清洗效果评价。
BMC Infect Dis. 2010 Jul 9;10:200. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-200.

引用本文的文献

1
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2024 Dec;67(12):1410-1468. doi: 10.1007/s00103-024-03942-1.
2
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019: Indications, Findings, and Safety.新型冠状病毒病 2019 患者的胃肠内镜检查:适应证、发现和安全性。
Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2023 Mar;52(1):157-172. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2022.11.002. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
3
Efficacy of a novel channel-cleaning ball brush for endoscope reprocessing: a randomized controlled trial.
一种新型通道清洁球刷在内镜再处理中的效果:一项随机对照试验。
Clin Endosc. 2022 Sep;55(5):674-682. doi: 10.5946/ce.2021.210. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
4
AGA Rapid Recommendations for Gastrointestinal Procedures During the COVID-19 Pandemic.美国胃肠病学会关于2019冠状病毒病大流行期间胃肠道手术的快速建议
Gastroenterology. 2020 Aug;159(2):739-758.e4. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.03.072. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
5
The impact of the use of different types of gloves and bare hands for preparation of clean surgical instruments.使用不同类型手套及徒手准备清洁手术器械的影响。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2016 Oct 10;24:e2805. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.1127.2805.
6
Residual bioburden in reprocessed side-view endoscopes used for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).用于内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)的再处理侧视内镜中的残留生物负载。
Endosc Int Open. 2013 Dec;1(1):12-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1359234.
7
Is peracetic acid suitable for the cleaning step of reprocessing flexible endoscopes?过氧乙酸是否适用于软式内镜再处理的清洗步骤?
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Sep 16;6(9):390-406. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i9.390.
8
Transmission of infection by flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy and bronchoscopy.经软性胃肠内镜和支气管镜传播感染。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013 Apr;26(2):231-54. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00085-12.
9
Assessment on experimental bacterial biofilms and in clinical practice of the efficacy of sampling solutions for microbiological testing of endoscopes.评估实验细菌生物膜和临床实践中用于内窥镜微生物检测的采样溶液的疗效。
J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Mar;50(3):938-42. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06221-11. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
10
Results of gastroscope bacterial decontamination by enzymatic detergent compared to chlorhexidine.与洗必泰相比,酶洗涤剂对胃镜进行细菌去污的效果。
World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Jul 14;12(26):4199-202. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i26.4199.