Vold B S
J Bacteriol. 1978 Jul;135(1):124-32. doi: 10.1128/jb.135.1.124-132.1978.
Structural similarities of tRNA's were compared using three sets of isoaccepting species that had previously been shown to undergo significant changes in chromatographic elution properties as a function of developmental stage in Bacillus subtilis. Comparisons of the structures of the tRNA's were based on the composition of their modified nucleosides, comparisons of oligonucleotide elution profiles from RPC-5 columns, and two-dimensional electrophoretic fingerprint analysis of oligonucleotides. The tRNA's studied were tRNA(Lys) (1) and tRNA(Lys) (3); tRNA(Tyr) (1) and tRNA(Tyr) (2); and tRNA(Trp) (1) and tRNA(Trp) (2). The results suggest that the difference among these pairs of isoaccepting species is a difference in the degree of post-transcriptional modifications of the anticodon loop region. The nucleosides involved were N(6)-(Delta(2)-isopentenyl)adenosine (i(6)A), 2-methylthio-N(6)-(Delta(2)-isopentenyl)adenosine (ms(2)i(6)A), and an unknown nucleoside K, which occurred in a position analogous to N-[9-(beta-d-ribofuranosyl)purin-6-ylcarbamoyl]threonine. The amounts of i(6)A and ms(2)i(6)A, determined using total tRNA from exponential-or stationary-phase cells, suggest that the thiomethylation of i(6)A is a pleiotropic phenomenon affecting several tRNA species. As opposed to the situation in Escherichia coli tRNA, where ms(2)i(6)A constitutes about 90% of the total hydrophobic nucleosides at all growth stages, B. subtilis tRNA's have i(6)A as the predominant hydrophobic nucleoside in exponential growth and ms(2)i(6)A as the predominant nucleoside in stationary phase. Thus, the enzyme system which forms i(6)A and the enzyme system which thiomethylates i(6)A are not coordinated during growth in B. subtilis as they are in E. coli. It is suggested that these changes in anticodon loop modifications in B. subtilis may be related to changes in the translational apparatus which occur during sporulation.
利用三组同功受体tRNA对枯草芽孢杆菌中tRNA的结构相似性进行了比较,这三组同功受体tRNA先前已被证明其色谱洗脱特性会随发育阶段发生显著变化。tRNA结构的比较基于其修饰核苷的组成、RPC - 5柱上寡核苷酸洗脱图谱的比较以及寡核苷酸的二维电泳指纹分析。所研究的tRNA包括tRNA(Lys)(1)和tRNA(Lys)(3);tRNA(Tyr)(1)和tRNA(Tyr)(2);以及tRNA(Trp)(1)和tRNA(Trp)(2)。结果表明,这些同功受体tRNA对之间的差异在于反密码子环区域转录后修饰程度的不同。涉及的核苷有N(6)-(Δ(2)-异戊烯基)腺苷(i(6)A)、2-甲硫基-N(6)-(Δ(2)-异戊烯基)腺苷(ms(2)i(6)A)以及一种未知核苷K,其位置类似于N-[9-(β - d - 呋喃核糖基)嘌呤-6-基氨基甲酰]苏氨酸。使用指数生长期或稳定期细胞的总tRNA测定的i(6)A和ms(2)i(6)A的量表明,i(6)A的硫甲基化是一种影响多种tRNA种类的多效性现象。与大肠杆菌tRNA的情况不同,在大肠杆菌中ms(2)i(6)A在所有生长阶段占总疏水核苷的约90%,枯草芽孢杆菌tRNA在指数生长期以i(6)A作为主要疏水核苷,在稳定期以ms(2)i(6)A作为主要核苷。因此,在枯草芽孢杆菌生长过程中,形成i(6)A的酶系统和使i(6)A硫甲基化的酶系统不像在大肠杆菌中那样协调。有人认为,枯草芽孢杆菌反密码子环修饰的这些变化可能与芽孢形成过程中发生的翻译装置的变化有关。