Suppr超能文献

[苯并咪唑类药物治疗肺泡型棘球蚴病的前瞻性长期研究]

[Chemotherapy of alveolar echinococcosis with benzimidazoles. A prospective long-term study].

作者信息

Reuter S, Kratzer W, Kurz S, Wellinghausen N, Kern P

机构信息

Abteilung Innere Medizin III, Universität Ulm.

出版信息

Med Klin (Munich). 1998 Aug 15;93(8):463-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03042595.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mebendazole and albendazole are the drugs of choice for the treatment of alveolar echinococcosis. In this prospective study we present and evaluate the outcome of the long-term treatment with both drugs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-four patients were treated with either mebendazole or albendazole and they were followed up for an average of 42 months. Success of treatment was defined as non-progression for more than 1 year.

RESULTS

The overall success-rate was approximately 80% (35/44). An initial regimen was recurrence-free in 64% of cases under mebendazole and in 73% of cases under albendazole. Half of the cases with recurrent disease could be stabilized after changing the therapeutic regimen. Seven patients received a continuous regimen with albendazole. They were observed over an average of 19 months without signs of progression nor significant side effects.

CONCLUSION

This open-labelled prospective study demonstrates the high therapeutic efficacy of both mebendazole and albendazole with similar response rates in the treatment of alveolar echinococcosis. In Germany, serum levels for mebendazole can easily be obtained at numerous institutes, while serum levels for albendazole are rarely available. On the other hand, albendazole reduces costs by over 40%. A simplified mode of intake and a reduced number of side effects argue in favor of the preferred use of albendazole. Albendazole in alveolar echinococcosis is only licensed for intermittent application. Nonetheless, continuous treatment may be considered in inoperable cases or progressive disease.

摘要

背景

甲苯咪唑和阿苯达唑是治疗泡型包虫病的首选药物。在这项前瞻性研究中,我们展示并评估了这两种药物的长期治疗效果。

患者与方法

44例患者接受了甲苯咪唑或阿苯达唑治疗,平均随访42个月。治疗成功定义为病情无进展超过1年。

结果

总体成功率约为80%(35/44)。初始治疗方案在甲苯咪唑治疗组64%的病例中无复发,在阿苯达唑治疗组73%的病例中无复发。半数复发患者在更改治疗方案后病情得到稳定。7例患者接受了阿苯达唑持续治疗方案。他们平均接受了19个月的观察,无病情进展迹象,也无明显副作用。

结论

这项开放标签的前瞻性研究表明,甲苯咪唑和阿苯达唑在治疗泡型包虫病方面均具有较高的治疗效果,且有效率相似。在德国,许多机构都能轻松获得甲苯咪唑的血清水平数据,而阿苯达唑的血清水平数据则很少见。另一方面,阿苯达唑可降低成本超过40%。服用方式简化且副作用减少,这些因素支持优先使用阿苯达唑。阿苯达唑在泡型包虫病中的应用仅获批用于间歇治疗。尽管如此,对于无法手术的病例或病情进展的患者,可考虑持续治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验