Schmidt H
Columbia College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA.
Acad Med. 1998 Sep;73(9 Suppl):S24-31. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199809001-00006.
In this chapter, the author describes integrating the teaching of the basic sciences, clinical sciences, and biopsychosocial issues in medical education as part of the curricular reform efforts initiated by schools that participated in The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's project "Preparing: Physicians for the Future: Program in Medical Education." The author focuses on the approaches the eight schools adopted, the challenges they encountered, and the lessons they learned in attempting to implement more integrated curricula. Integration was promoted both within and among various components of medical education. For example, in some cases discipline-based courses in the basic sciences were replaced with interdisciplinary courses. Further, efforts were made both to bring clinical relevance to the basic sciences and to strengthen basic science in the clinical years. All the schools also promoted the study of the humanities and biopsychosocial sciences throughout the curriculum. The author describes problems encountered in these endeavors, resources needed to support interdisciplinary courses, the benefits of integration, and common lessons learned by the eight schools.
在本章中,作者描述了将基础科学、临床科学以及生物心理社会问题的教学整合到医学教育中,这是参与罗伯特·伍德·约翰逊基金会“为未来培养医生:医学教育项目”的学校发起的课程改革努力的一部分。作者重点介绍了八所学校采用的方法、他们遇到的挑战以及在尝试实施更综合课程过程中吸取的经验教训。医学教育的各个组成部分内部和之间都在推动整合。例如,在某些情况下,基础科学中基于学科的课程被跨学科课程所取代。此外,人们既努力使基础科学具有临床相关性,又努力在临床阶段加强基础科学教学。所有学校还在整个课程中推动人文和生物心理社会科学的学习。作者描述了这些努力中遇到的问题、支持跨学科课程所需的资源、整合的益处以及八所学校共同吸取的经验教训。