• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

产品使用中带来愉悦感的人为因素。

Human factors for pleasure in product use.

作者信息

Jordan P W

机构信息

Philips Design, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Appl Ergon. 1998 Feb;29(1):25-33. doi: 10.1016/s0003-6870(97)00022-7.

DOI:10.1016/s0003-6870(97)00022-7
PMID:9769086
Abstract

Traditionally, human factors have tended to concentrate on making products 'usable'--focusing on utilitarian, functional product benefits. This paper reports an interview-based study looking at the issue of 'pleasure' in product use. The study was a 'first pass' at addressing the hedonic and experiential benefits and penalties associated with product use, and at identifying the properties of a product that influence how pleasurable or displeasurable it is to use. Feelings associated with using pleasurable products included security, confidence, pride, excitement and satisfaction. Displeasurable products, meanwhile, were associated with feelings that included annoyance, anxiety, contempt and frustration. The properties of products that were salient in terms of influencing the level of pleasure/displeasure with a product included features, usability, aesthetics, performance and reliability. Responses to questions investigating behavioural correlates to pleasure in product use suggested that pleasurable products were used more regularly and that future purchase choices would be affected by the level of pleasure in product use. It is concluded that the issue of pleasure in product use involves more than usability alone. As the user's representative in the product creation process, the human factors specialist should consider many other factors in order to ensure that the user's experience of product use is maximised.

摘要

传统上,人因工程学倾向于专注于使产品“可用”——关注产品功利性、功能性的益处。本文报告了一项基于访谈的研究,探讨产品使用中的“愉悦感”问题。该研究是对与产品使用相关的享乐和体验益处及弊端的“初步探讨”,旨在确定影响产品使用愉悦或不悦程度的产品特性。使用愉悦产品所带来的感受包括安全感、自信、自豪、兴奋和满足感。与此同时,不悦的产品则与恼怒、焦虑、轻蔑和沮丧等感受相关。在影响对产品愉悦/不悦程度方面显著的产品特性包括功能、可用性、美学、性能和可靠性。对调查产品使用愉悦感行为相关性问题的回答表明,愉悦的产品使用频率更高,且未来的购买选择会受到产品使用愉悦程度的影响。研究得出结论,产品使用中的愉悦感问题不仅仅涉及可用性。作为产品创造过程中用户的代表,人因工程学专家应考虑许多其他因素,以确保用户的产品使用体验最大化。

相似文献

1
Human factors for pleasure in product use.产品使用中带来愉悦感的人为因素。
Appl Ergon. 1998 Feb;29(1):25-33. doi: 10.1016/s0003-6870(97)00022-7.
2
The influence of product aesthetics and usability over the course of time: a longitudinal field experiment.产品美学和可用性随时间的影响:一项纵向现场实验。
Ergonomics. 2012;55(7):713-30. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2012.672658. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
3
Is utility in the mind of the beholder? A study of ergonomics methods.效用存在于旁观者的心中吗?一项关于人体工程学方法的研究。
Appl Ergon. 1998 Feb;29(1):41-54. doi: 10.1016/s0003-6870(97)00024-0.
4
Ergonomics in consumer product evaluation: an evolving process.消费品评估中的人体工程学:一个不断发展的过程。
Appl Ergon. 1998 Feb;29(1):55-8. doi: 10.1016/s0003-6870(97)88805-9.
5
The impact of different product formats on inaction inertia.不同产品形式对不作为惯性的影响。
J Soc Psychol. 2019;159(5):546-560. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2018.1520686. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
6
Testing usability with 3D paper prototypes--Case Halton system.使用3D纸质原型测试可用性——哈尔顿系统案例
Appl Ergon. 1998 Feb;29(1):67-73. doi: 10.1016/s0003-6870(97)00027-6.
7
Product design and apparent usability. The influence of novelty in product appearance.产品设计与明显可用性。产品外观新颖性的影响。
Appl Ergon. 2012 Nov;43(6):1081-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2012.03.009. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
8
Designing for consumers.为消费者设计。
Appl Ergon. 1998 Feb;29(1):1-3. doi: 10.1016/s0003-6870(97)00019-7.
9
Applying the BeSafe method to product safety evaluation.将BeSafe方法应用于产品安全评估。
Appl Ergon. 1998 Feb;29(1):5-13. doi: 10.1016/s0003-6870(97)00020-3.
10
Usage centred research for everyday product design.以日常产品设计为中心的使用研究。
Appl Ergon. 1998 Feb;29(1):75-82. doi: 10.1016/s0003-6870(97)00028-8.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of negative emotions on product purchase decisions: a study of watch design.负面情绪对产品购买决策的影响:一项关于手表设计的研究
BMC Psychol. 2025 Apr 28;13(1):447. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02775-0.
2
Innovating Household Food Waste Management: A User-Centric Approach with AHP-TRIZ Integration.创新家庭厨余垃圾管理:基于 AHP-TRIZ 集成的用户为中心方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jan 26;24(3):820. doi: 10.3390/s24030820.
3
An Ontological Approach of the Cognitive and Affective Product Experience.认知与情感产品体验的本体论方法
Front Neuroergon. 2021 Feb 12;2:602881. doi: 10.3389/fnrgo.2021.602881. eCollection 2021.
4
A Systematic Literature Review of Consumers' Cognitive-Affective Needs in Product Design From 1999 to 2019.1999年至2019年产品设计中消费者认知情感需求的系统文献综述
Front Neuroergon. 2021 Feb 3;1:617799. doi: 10.3389/fnrgo.2020.617799. eCollection 2020.
5
Design Perceptions for 3D Printed Accessories of Digital Devices and Consumer-Based Brand Equity.数字设备3D打印配件的设计认知与基于消费者的品牌资产
Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 10;10:2800. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02800. eCollection 2019.
6
Factors Influencing Usability of a Smartphone App to Reduce Excessive Alcohol Consumption: Think Aloud and Interview Studies.影响智能手机应用减少过度饮酒可用性的因素:出声思维和访谈研究
Front Public Health. 2017 Apr 3;5:39. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00039. eCollection 2017.
7
When the going gets tough the beautiful get going: aesthetic appeal facilitates task performance.艰难时刻,美者前行:审美吸引力有助于任务表现。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Oct;22(5):1243-54. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0794-z.