Suppr超能文献

年龄、目标-干扰物相似度与视觉搜索。

Age, target-distractor similarity, and visual search.

作者信息

Scialfa C T, Esau S P, Joffe K M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Exp Aging Res. 1998 Oct-Dec;24(4):337-58. doi: 10.1080/036107398244184.

Abstract

Younger and older adults were asked to find a single target in both feature- and conjunction- search conditions. Display size varied between 2 and 8 items, and target-distractor similarity ranged from relatively low to high levels. The accuracy data indicated that older adults had particular difficulty finding targets in high-similarity conjunction-search displays containing a large number of distractors. The reaction time (RT) analyses found larger age deficits in many of these same conditions. For both groups, predictions of conjunction search based on Treisman and Sato's additive model (Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1990: 16, 459-478) departed significantly from actual performance. The RT data of older observers were, in large part, predicted as a simple linear function of the young adults' data. These results are discussed with respect to age differences in selective attention, generalized slowing, and an age-related loss in search efficiency.

摘要

研究人员要求年轻人和老年人在特征搜索和联合搜索条件下寻找单个目标。显示的项目数量在2到8个之间变化,目标与干扰项的相似度范围从相对较低到较高水平。准确性数据表明,老年人在包含大量干扰项的高相似度联合搜索显示中寻找目标时特别困难。反应时间(RT)分析发现在许多相同条件下年龄差异更大。对于两组来说,基于特雷斯曼和佐藤的加法模型(《实验心理学杂志:人类知觉与表现》,1990年:16,459 - 478)对联合搜索的预测与实际表现有显著差异。老年观察者的反应时间数据在很大程度上被预测为年轻人数据的简单线性函数。我们将根据选择性注意、普遍减缓以及与年龄相关的搜索效率损失方面的年龄差异来讨论这些结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验