Suppr超能文献

美国综合健康术语系统框架:制定指南、选择标准及公共政策影响。美国国家标准学会医疗保健信息学标准委员会词汇工作组及基于计算机的患者记录协会代码与结构工作组

A framework for comprehensive health terminology systems in the United States: development guidelines, criteria for selection, and public policy implications. ANSI Healthcare Informatics Standards Board Vocabulary Working Group and the Computer-Based Patient Records Institute Working Group on Codes and Structures.

作者信息

Chute C G, Cohn S P, Campbell J R

机构信息

Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998 Nov-Dec;5(6):503-10. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1998.0050503.

Abstract

Health care in the United States has become an information-intensive industry, yet electronic health records represent patient data inconsistently for lack of clinical data standards. Classifications that have achieved common acceptance, such as the ICD-9-CM or ICD, aggregate heterogeneous patients into broad categories, which preclude their practical use in decision support, development of refined guidelines, or detailed comparison of patient outcomes or benchmarks. This document proposes a framework for the integration and maturation of clinical terminologies that would have practical applications in patient care, process management, outcome analysis, and decision support. Arising from the two working groups within the standards community--the ANSI (American National Standards Institute) Healthcare Informatics Standards Board Working Group and the Computer-based Patient Records Institute Working Group on Codes and Structures--it outlines policies regarding 1) functional characteristics of practical terminologies, 2) terminology models that can broaden their applications and contribute to their sustainability, 3) maintenance attributes that will enable terminologies to keep pace with rapidly changing health care knowledge and process, and 4) administrative issues that would facilitate their accessibility, adoption, and application to improve the quality and efficiency of American health care.

摘要

美国的医疗保健已成为一个信息密集型产业,但由于缺乏临床数据标准,电子健康记录对患者数据的呈现并不一致。像国际疾病分类第九版临床修订本(ICD - 9 - CM)或国际疾病分类(ICD)等已获得普遍认可的分类系统,将不同类型的患者归为宽泛的类别,这使得它们在决策支持、制定精细指南或详细比较患者预后或基准方面无法实际应用。本文档提出了一个临床术语整合与成熟的框架,该框架将在患者护理、流程管理、结果分析和决策支持方面具有实际应用价值。该框架源自标准领域的两个工作组——美国国家标准学会(ANSI)医疗保健信息学标准委员会工作组以及基于计算机的患者记录学会代码与结构工作组,它概述了以下方面的政策:1)实用术语的功能特性;2)能够拓展其应用范围并有助于其可持续性的术语模型;3)使术语能够跟上快速变化的医疗保健知识和流程的维护属性;4)有助于术语的可获取性、采用率以及应用以提高美国医疗保健质量和效率的管理问题。

相似文献

7
Evolving to clinical terminology.向临床术语发展。
J Healthc Inf Manag. 2004 Summer;18(3):37-43.
10
Nursing standards to support the electronic health record.支持电子健康记录的护理标准。
Nurs Outlook. 2008 Sep-Oct;56(5):258-266.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2008.06.005.

引用本文的文献

3
AnnoDash, a clinical terminology annotation dashboard.AnnoDash,一个临床术语注释仪表板。
JAMIA Open. 2023 Jul 8;6(3):ooad046. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad046. eCollection 2023 Oct.
10
Terminology Services: Standard Terminologies to Control Health Vocabulary.术语服务:控制健康词汇的标准术语
Yearb Med Inform. 2018 Aug;27(1):227-233. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1641200. Epub 2018 Apr 22.

本文引用的文献

9
Formal properties of the Metathesaurus.叙词表的形式属性。
Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1994:145-9.
10
The Canon Group's effort: working toward a merged model.佳能集团的努力:朝着合并模式迈进。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1995 Jan-Feb;2(1):4-18. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1995.95202547.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验