• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Maximum workplace concentration values and carcinogenicity classification for mixtures.混合物的工作场所最大浓度值及致癌性分类
Environ Health Perspect. 1998 Dec;106 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):1291-3. doi: 10.1289/ehp.98106s61291.
2
Examples of MAK values and carcinogenicity classification for mixtures.混合物的MAK值及致癌性分类示例。
Food Chem Toxicol. 1996 Nov-Dec;34(11-12):1167-8. doi: 10.1016/s0278-6915(97)00091-4.
3
Classification of skin sensitizing substances: a comparison between approaches used by the DFG-MAK Commission and the European Union legislation.皮肤致敏物质的分类:德国研究联合会 - 马克斯·普朗克协会委员会与欧盟法规所采用方法的比较。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2011 Oct;61(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.06.008. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
4
Extensive changes to occupational exposure limits in Korea.韩国对职业接触限值进行了广泛修改。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2010 Nov;58(2):345-8. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.08.006. Epub 2010 Aug 13.
5
[The evaluation of occupational exposure to carcinogenic substances: limit values and risk assessments].[职业接触致癌物质的评估:限值与风险评估]
G Ital Med Lav. 1990 Sep-Nov;12(5-6):201-7.
6
Scientific and practical considerations for the development of occupational exposure limits (OELs) for chemical substances.制定化学物质职业接触限值(OELs)的科学与实际考量
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1992 Jun;15(3):291-306. doi: 10.1016/0273-2300(92)90040-g.
7
Development of occupational exposure limits in Japan.日本职业接触限值的制定。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 1998;11(1):81-98.
8
Reassessment of occupational exposure limits.职业接触限值的重新评估。
Am J Ind Med. 2008 Jun;51(6):407-18. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20579.
9
Background, approaches and recent trends for setting health-based occupational exposure limits: a minireview.基于健康的职业接触限值设定的背景、方法及近期趋势:一篇综述
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008 Aug;51(3):253-69. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2008.04.002. Epub 2008 Apr 14.
10
Use of the benchmark-dose (BMD) approach to derive occupational exposure limits (OELs) for genotoxic carcinogens: N-nitrosamines.应用基准剂量(BMD)方法推导遗传毒性致癌物的职业接触限值(OEL):亚硝胺。
J Appl Toxicol. 2023 Aug;43(8):1183-1200. doi: 10.1002/jat.4455. Epub 2023 Mar 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Proposed changes in the classification of carcinogenic chemicals in the work area.工作场所致癌化学物质分类的拟议变更。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1997 Dec;26(3):288-95. doi: 10.1006/rtph.1997.1152.
2
Experimental designs and risk assessment in combination toxicology: panel discussion.组合毒理学中的实验设计与风险评估:小组讨论
Food Chem Toxicol. 1996 Nov-Dec;34(11-12):1183-5. doi: 10.1016/s0278-6915(97)00097-5.
3
Risk assessment of mixtures and standard setting: working towards practical compromises.混合物的风险评估与标准制定:寻求切实可行的折衷方案。
Food Chem Toxicol. 1996 Nov-Dec;34(11-12):1179-81. doi: 10.1016/s0278-6915(97)00096-3.
4
Occupational exposure.职业暴露。
Food Chem Toxicol. 1996 Nov-Dec;34(11-12):1177-8. doi: 10.1016/s0278-6915(97)00095-1.
5
Toxicity of mixtures of nephrotoxicants with similar or dissimilar mode of action.具有相似或不同作用方式的肾毒物混合物的毒性。
Food Chem Toxicol. 1996 Nov-Dec;34(11-12):1075-82. doi: 10.1016/s0278-6915(97)00077-x.
6
Subacute toxicity of a mixture of nine chemicals in rats: detecting interactive effects with a fractionated two-level factorial design.九种化学物质混合物对大鼠的亚急性毒性:采用二级析因设计检测交互作用
Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1997 Mar;36(1):15-29. doi: 10.1006/faat.1996.2281.
7
Sensory irritation to mixtures of formaldehyde, acrolein, and acetaldehyde in rats.大鼠对甲醛、丙烯醛和乙醛混合物的感觉刺激。
Arch Toxicol. 1996;70(6):329-37. doi: 10.1007/s002040050282.
8
Carcinogenic potential of some pesticides in a medium-term multi-organ bioassay in rats.某些农药在大鼠中期多器官生物测定中的致癌潜力。
Int J Cancer. 1993 May 28;54(3):489-93. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910540322.
9
Subacute (4-wk) oral toxicity of a combination of four nephrotoxins in rats: comparison with the toxicity of the individual compounds.四种肾毒素组合对大鼠的亚急性(4周)经口毒性:与各单一化合物毒性的比较。
Food Chem Toxicol. 1993 Feb;31(2):125-36. doi: 10.1016/0278-6915(93)90126-j.
10
Risk assessment of chemical mixtures: biologic and toxicologic issues.化学混合物的风险评估:生物学和毒理学问题
Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1993 Oct;21(3):258-69. doi: 10.1006/faat.1993.1098.

混合物的工作场所最大浓度值及致癌性分类

Maximum workplace concentration values and carcinogenicity classification for mixtures.

作者信息

Bartsch R, Forderkunz S, Reuter U, Sterzl-Eckert H, Greim H

机构信息

GSF-Institute for Toxicology, Neuherberg, Germany.

出版信息

Environ Health Perspect. 1998 Dec;106 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):1291-3. doi: 10.1289/ehp.98106s61291.

DOI:10.1289/ehp.98106s61291
PMID:9860883
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1533424/
Abstract

In Germany, the Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area (MAK Commission) generally sets maximum workplace concentration values (i.e., a proposed occupational exposure level [OEL]) for single substances, not for mixtures. For mixtures containing substances with a genotoxic and carcinogenic potential, the commission considered it scientifically inappropriate to establish a safe threshold. This approach is currently under discussion. Carcinogenic mixtures are categorized according to either the carcinogenicity of the mixture or the classification of the carcinogenic substances included. In regulating exposure to mixtures, an approach similar to that used by the American Conference of Governmental Hygienists is proposed: For components with the same target organ and mode of action or interfering metabolism, synergistic effects must be expected and the respective OELs must be lowered. However, if there is proof that the components act independently, the OELs of the individual compounds are not considered to be modified. In the view of the commission, calculating OELs for solvent mixtures according to their liquid phase composition is not justified, and the setting of scientifically based OELs for complex mixtures is not possible.

摘要

在德国,工作场所化学化合物健康危害调查委员会(MAK委员会)通常为单一物质而非混合物设定工作场所最大浓度值(即建议的职业接触限值[OEL])。对于含有具有遗传毒性和致癌潜力物质的混合物,该委员会认为设定安全阈值在科学上是不合适的。这种方法目前正在讨论中。致癌混合物根据混合物的致癌性或所含致癌物质的分类进行归类。在规范混合物的接触时,建议采用类似于美国政府工业卫生学家会议所使用的方法:对于具有相同靶器官、作用方式或干扰代谢的成分,必须预期会有协同效应,相应的OEL必须降低。然而,如果有证据表明这些成分独立起作用,则不认为单个化合物的OEL会被修改。该委员会认为,根据溶剂混合物的液相组成计算OEL是不合理的,而且为复杂混合物设定基于科学的OEL是不可能的。