Suppr超能文献

用于水中产气荚膜梭菌膜过滤计数的两种培养基的评估。

Evaluation of two media for the membrane filtration enumeration of Clostridium perfringens from water.

作者信息

Sartory D P, Field M, Curbishley S M, Pritchard A M

机构信息

Severn Trent Water, Quality & Environmental Services, Shrewsbury, UK.

出版信息

Lett Appl Microbiol. 1998 Dec;27(6):323-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1472-765x.1998.00454.x.

Abstract

Two media (mCP medium and Tryptose Sulphite Cycloserine (TSC) agar) were evaluated for recovery of Clostridium perfringens in environmental and part-treated drinking water. For laboratory strains of Clostridium, mCP was more selective and specific for Cl. perfringens than TSC, but was markedly less efficient for the enumeration of both vegetative cells and spores. For samples of river water and part-treated drinking water, TSC recovered significantly greater numbers of Cl. perfringens than mCP. In contrast to previous reports, there was a significant number of false presumptive positive and negative isolates on mCP. TSC is a more suitable medium for the routine monitoring of water supplies for the presence of Cl. perfringens.

摘要

评估了两种培养基(mCP培养基和胰蛋白胨亚硫酸盐环丝氨酸(TSC)琼脂)用于从环境和部分处理过的饮用水中回收产气荚膜梭菌的效果。对于产气荚膜梭菌的实验室菌株,mCP对产气荚膜梭菌的选择性和特异性比TSC更高,但在计数营养细胞和芽孢方面的效率明显较低。对于河水和部分处理过的饮用水样本,TSC回收的产气荚膜梭菌数量明显多于mCP。与之前的报告相反,mCP上有大量假阳性和假阴性的推定分离株。TSC是用于常规监测供水系统中是否存在产气荚膜梭菌的更合适培养基。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验