• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估三种不同选择性培养基用于未经处理和经处理废水中[具体物质未给出]计数的效果。

Evaluation of Three Different Selective Media for Enumeration of in Untreated and Treated Wastewater.

作者信息

Karon A J, Bailey Emily S, Sobsey Mark D

机构信息

Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

Department of Public Health, College of Pharmacy & Health Sciences, Campbell University, Buies Creek, NC 27506, USA.

出版信息

Pathogens. 2024 Jun 21;13(7):526. doi: 10.3390/pathogens13070526.

DOI:10.3390/pathogens13070526
PMID:39057753
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11279483/
Abstract

Current and emerging legislation in North Carolina and other regions calls for the enumeration of as a surrogate indicator for protozoan parasites in various types of waters. Past studies that have evaluated selective media for the detection of this bacterium have provided limited, conflicting, and inconclusive results. In this study, membrane filtration was used to enumerate as culturable spores or total culturable cells in 19 samples of untreated and 25 samples of partially treated wastewaters on 3 candidate media, Tryptose Sulfite Cycloserine Agar (TSC), CP ChromoSelect Agar (CPCS), and membrane Agar (m-CP) in parallel, and the results were compared. Presumptive isolates from each agar were further subjected to phenotypic confirmation tests for acid phosphatase production and stormy fermentation to further determine the performance of each agar. The CPCS agar was determined to have the highest enumerative capacity of total cells when compared to both TSC agar and m-CP agar (-value < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in its ability to detect spores when compared to TSC agar (-value > 0.05). The overall specificity of CPCS agar as determined by agreement of results from both confirmation tests was 0.81, while the specificity of TSC agar was only 0.28. Based on its performance, ease of preparation and use and consistency of colony characteristics, CPCS agar is recommended as the preferred medium for enumeration in wastewater.

摘要

北卡罗来纳州和其他地区现行及新出现的法规要求对 进行计数,将其作为各类水体中原生动物寄生虫的替代指标。过去评估用于检测这种细菌的选择性培养基的研究结果有限、相互矛盾且无定论。在本研究中,采用膜过滤法,在3种候选培养基(胰蛋白胨亚硫酸盐环丝氨酸琼脂(TSC)、CP色选琼脂(CPCS)和膜 琼脂(m-CP))上,并行计数19份未处理废水样品和25份部分处理废水样品中的可培养孢子或总可培养细胞,并对结果进行比较。对每种琼脂上的推定分离株进一步进行酸性磷酸酶产生和剧烈发酵的表型确认试验,以进一步确定每种琼脂的性能。与TSC琼脂和m-CP琼脂相比,CPCS琼脂对总 细胞的计数能力最高(-值<0.05),但与TSC琼脂相比,其检测孢子的能力无显著差异(-值>0.05)。通过两项确认试验结果的一致性确定,CPCS琼脂的总体特异性为0.81,而TSC琼脂的特异性仅为0.28。基于其性能、制备和使用的简便性以及菌落特征的一致性,建议将CPCS琼脂作为废水中 计数的首选培养基。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Three Different Selective Media for Enumeration of in Untreated and Treated Wastewater.评估三种不同选择性培养基用于未经处理和经处理废水中[具体物质未给出]计数的效果。
Pathogens. 2024 Jun 21;13(7):526. doi: 10.3390/pathogens13070526.
2
Enumeration of Clostridium perfringens spores in groundwater samples: comparison of six culture media.地下水样中产气荚膜梭菌孢子的计数:六种培养基的比较
J Microbiol Methods. 2004 May;57(2):175-80. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2003.12.010.
3
Enumeration of fecal Clostridium perfringens spores in egg yolk-free tryptose-sulfite-cycloserine agar.在无蛋黄胰蛋白胨亚硫酸盐环丝氨酸琼脂中对粪便产气荚膜梭菌芽孢进行计数。
Appl Microbiol. 1974 Mar;27(3):527-30. doi: 10.1128/am.27.3.527-530.1974.
4
Enumeration of food-borne Clostridium perfringens in egg yolk-free tryptose-sulfite-cycloserine agar.在无蛋黄胰蛋白胨亚硫酸盐环丝氨酸琼脂中对食源性产气荚膜梭菌进行计数。
Appl Microbiol. 1974 Mar;27(3):521-6. doi: 10.1128/am.27.3.521-526.1974.
5
Evaluation of two media for the membrane filtration enumeration of Clostridium perfringens from water.用于水中产气荚膜梭菌膜过滤计数的两种培养基的评估。
Lett Appl Microbiol. 1998 Dec;27(6):323-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1472-765x.1998.00454.x.
6
Evaluation of an alternative method for the enumeration and confirmation of Clostridium perfringens from treated and untreated sewages.评估一种用于对经过处理和未经处理的污水中产气荚膜梭菌进行计数和鉴定的替代方法。
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2006 May;42(5):438-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2006.01912.x.
7
Evaluation of acid phosphatase as a confirmation test for Clostridium perfringens isolated from water.评估酸性磷酸酶作为从水中分离出的产气荚膜梭菌的确证试验。
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2006 Apr;42(4):418-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2006.01867.x.
8
Comparison of methods for the enumeration of Clostridium perfringens spores in water.水中产气荚膜梭菌孢子计数方法的比较。
Water Sci Technol. 2012;65(2):227-32. doi: 10.2166/wst.2012.758.
9
Rapid detection of Clostridium perfringens: comparison of lactose sulfite broth with tryptose-sulfite-cycloserine agar.产气荚膜梭菌的快速检测:乳糖亚硫酸盐肉汤与胰蛋白胨亚硫酸盐环丝氨酸琼脂的比较
J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1985 Sep-Oct;68(5):881-3.
10
Comparison of a new, bismuth-iron-sulfite-cycloserine agar for isolation of Clostridium perfringens with the tryptose-sulfite-cycloserine and blood agars.一种用于分离产气荚膜梭菌的新型铋铁亚硫酸盐环丝氨酸琼脂与胰蛋白胨亚硫酸盐环丝氨酸琼脂和血琼脂的比较。
Zentralbl Bakteriol. 1997 Feb;285(3):397-402. doi: 10.1016/s0934-8840(97)80006-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of mCP and TSC Media to Enumerate in Surface Water Samples.比较 mCP 和 TSC 培养基以对地表水样本进行计数。
Pol J Microbiol. 2023 Dec 16;72(4):413-419. doi: 10.33073/pjm-2023-039. eCollection 2023 Dec 1.
2
Differentiation of Clostridium perfringens from Related Clostridia in Iron Milk Medium.
J Food Prot. 1985 Feb;48(2):130-134. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-48.2.130.
3
Use of bacterial spores in monitoring water quality and treatment.细菌孢子在水质监测与处理中的应用。
J Water Health. 2018 Aug;16(4):491-500. doi: 10.2166/wh.2018.013.
4
Evaluation of CP Chromo Select Agar for the enumeration of Clostridium perfringens from water.评价 CP 显色琼脂用于水样品中产气荚膜梭菌的计数。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2013 Oct 1;167(1):92-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.06.012. Epub 2013 Jun 18.
5
Comparison of methods for the enumeration of Clostridium perfringens spores in water.水中产气荚膜梭菌孢子计数方法的比较。
Water Sci Technol. 2012;65(2):227-32. doi: 10.2166/wst.2012.758.
6
Evaluation of acid phosphatase as a confirmation test for Clostridium perfringens isolated from water.评估酸性磷酸酶作为从水中分离出的产气荚膜梭菌的确证试验。
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2006 Apr;42(4):418-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2006.01867.x.
7
Enumeration of Clostridium perfringens spores in groundwater samples: comparison of six culture media.地下水样中产气荚膜梭菌孢子的计数:六种培养基的比较
J Microbiol Methods. 2004 May;57(2):175-80. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2003.12.010.
8
Evaluation of two media for the membrane filtration enumeration of Clostridium perfringens from water.用于水中产气荚膜梭菌膜过滤计数的两种培养基的评估。
Lett Appl Microbiol. 1998 Dec;27(6):323-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1472-765x.1998.00454.x.
9
Clostridium perfringens and somatic coliphages as indicators of the efficiency of drinking water treatment for viruses and protozoan cysts.产气荚膜梭菌和体细胞性大肠杆菌噬菌体作为饮用水处理对病毒和原生动物囊肿处理效率的指标。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993 Aug;59(8):2418-24. doi: 10.1128/aem.59.8.2418-2424.1993.
10
A study of rapid and simplified confirmatory tests for Clostridium perfringens.
J Appl Bacteriol. 1981 Oct;51(2):355-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1981.tb01252.x.