• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

南非克鲁格国家公园游客感染疟疾的风险。

Risk of malaria in visitors to the Kruger National Park, South Africa.

作者信息

Durrheim D N, Braack L E, Waner S, Gammon S

机构信息

Communicable Disease Control, Mpumalanga Department of Health, South Africa.

出版信息

J Travel Med. 1998 Dec;5(4):173-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8305.1998.tb00502.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1708-8305.1998.tb00502.x
PMID:9876190
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The risk of malaria to visitors to South Africa's nature reserves is unknown. Current recommendations for travelers are based on malaria incidence rates in local communities. These rates may well overestimate travelers' malaria risk and lead to unnecessary use of antimalarial prophylaxis with associated drug-related adverse events. This study investigated the incidence of malaria in visitors to South Africa's Kruger National Park (KNP).

METHODS

Postal questionnaires were sent to the cohort of visitors staying in the KNP during April 1996, 6 to 8 weeks after they returned to their homes. Nonrespondents received duplicate questionnaires 8 weeks later. Responses from 3267 groups, representing 11,107 visitors (56. 8%) allowed determination of the malaria attack rate in this group of travelers and assessment of associations between malaria risk and a number of factors, including type of accommodation used during the visit; duration of stay; use of chemoprophylaxis; and use of personal protection measures. All travelers indicating that they had suffered an episode of malaria following their visit were telephonically contacted and their health providers traced to determine the basis of diagnosis and clinical outcome.

RESULTS

One clinically suspected and four confirmed cases of Plasmodium falciparum malaria among the visitors suggest a low attack rate of 4. 5 cases per 10,000 visitors during April, the highest risk month for malaria in South Africa. No association was found between malaria risk and accommodation type, duration of stay, use and type of chemoprophylaxis, and use and number of personal protection measures.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings confirm the importance of careful assessment of local malaria risk before individualized advice is provided to travelers.

摘要

背景

前往南非自然保护区的游客感染疟疾的风险尚不清楚。目前针对旅行者的建议是基于当地社区的疟疾发病率。这些发病率很可能高估了旅行者感染疟疾的风险,并导致不必要地使用抗疟疾预防药物,从而引发相关的药物不良事件。本研究调查了前往南非克鲁格国家公园(KNP)的游客中疟疾的发病率。

方法

向1996年4月期间入住KNP的游客群体邮寄调查问卷,在他们回家6至8周后进行。未回复者在8周后收到重复问卷。来自3267个群体的回复,代表11107名游客(56.8%),由此可以确定这组旅行者的疟疾发病率,并评估疟疾风险与多种因素之间的关联,包括访问期间使用的住宿类型;停留时间;化学预防措施的使用;以及个人防护措施的使用。所有表示在访问后感染疟疾的旅行者都通过电话联系,并追踪他们的医疗服务提供者,以确定诊断依据和临床结果。

结果

在游客中,有1例临床疑似和4例确诊的恶性疟原虫疟疾病例,这表明在4月这个南非疟疾风险最高的月份,发病率较低,为每10000名游客中有4.5例。在疟疾风险与住宿类型、停留时间、化学预防措施的使用和类型,以及个人防护措施的使用和数量之间未发现关联。

结论

这些发现证实了在向旅行者提供个性化建议之前,仔细评估当地疟疾风险的重要性。

相似文献

1
Risk of malaria in visitors to the Kruger National Park, South Africa.南非克鲁格国家公园游客感染疟疾的风险。
J Travel Med. 1998 Dec;5(4):173-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8305.1998.tb00502.x.
2
Malaria protection measures used by in-flight travelers to South African game parks.前往南非野生动物园的空中旅行者所采用的疟疾防护措施。
J Travel Med. 1999 Dec;6(4):254-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8305.1999.tb00528.x.
3
Antimalarial prophylaxis--use and adverse events in visitors to the Kruger National Park.抗疟预防——克鲁格国家公园游客的使用情况及不良事件
S Afr Med J. 1999 Feb;89(2):170-5.
4
Surveillance for travel-related disease--GeoSentinel Surveillance System, United States, 1997-2011.旅行相关疾病监测——GeoSentinel 监测系统,美国,1997-2011 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2013 Jul 19;62:1-23.
5
Risk to tourists posed by wild mammals in South Africa.南非野生哺乳动物对游客构成的风险。
J Travel Med. 1999 Sep;6(3):172-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8305.1999.tb00856.x.
6
Malaria chemoprophylaxis advice: survey of South African community pharmacists' knowledge and practices.疟疾化学预防建议:南非社区药剂师知识与实践调查
J Travel Med. 2006 May-Jun;13(3):161-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8305.2006.00035.x.
7
Retrospective study of malaria cases treated in Newcastle General Hospital between 1990 and 1996.对1990年至1996年间在纽卡斯尔综合医院接受治疗的疟疾病例的回顾性研究。
J Travel Med. 1998 Dec;5(4):193-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8305.1998.tb00506.x.
8
Antimalarials for visitors to Kruger National Park?前往克鲁格国家公园的游客需要使用抗疟药吗?
J Travel Med. 1999 Sep;6(3):210.
9
Risk of malaria in British residents returning from malarious areas.从疟疾流行地区返回的英国居民感染疟疾的风险。
BMJ. 1990 Feb 24;300(6723):499-503. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6723.499.
10
Effectiveness of personal protection measures against mosquito bites for malaria prophylaxis in travelers.旅行者中用于预防疟疾的个人防蚊叮咬保护措施的有效性。
J Travel Med. 1998 Dec;5(4):188-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8305.1998.tb00505.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Host preference patterns in domestic and wild settings: Insights into feeding behavior.家养和野生环境中的宿主偏好模式:对摄食行为的洞察
Evol Appl. 2024 May 31;17(6):e13693. doi: 10.1111/eva.13693. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Prophylaxis against malaria. Preventing mosquito bites is also effective.疟疾预防。防止蚊虫叮咬也很有效。
BMJ. 1999 Apr 24;318(7191):1139.