Soulez G, Therasse E, Robillard P, Fontaine A, Denbow N, Bourgouin P, Oliva V L
Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999 Jan;172(1):207-12. doi: 10.2214/ajr.172.1.9888769.
The purpose of this study was to assess the value of the ratio between the internal carotid systolic velocity (ICSV) at the carotid bulb and the distal internal carotid systolic velocity (DICSV) for the detection of carotid artery stenosis.
Two hundred eleven patients were enrolled in a prospective study comparing several Doppler measurements with carotid angiography. The following spectral measurements were obtained with Doppler sonography: ICSV/DICSV ratio, ICSV, ICSV/common carotid systolic velocity (CCSV) ratio, and internal carotid (end) diastolic velocity (ICDV). Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated for two groups: the first group being 365 carotid arteries for which all Doppler measurements were successfully obtained and the second being a subgroup of 258 carotid arteries for which an ICSV of 100 cm/sec or greater was present.
In the group of 365 carotid arteries, the ICSV/DICSV ratio improved the detection of stenosis of 60% or greater as compared with the ICDV (p = .03). In 258 carotid arteries with an ICSV of 100 cm/sec or greater, the ICSV/DICSV ratio allowed for a better angiographic correlation for identifying stenoses of 60% or greater and 70% or greater as compared with ICSV (p = .006 and .023, respectively), ICSV/CCSV (p = .0013 and .003, respectively), and ICDV (p = .0015 and .020, respectively).
Using the ICSV/DICSV ratio for the Doppler detection of carotid artery stenosis is advantageous when the ICSV is 100 cm/sec or greater.
本研究旨在评估颈动脉窦处颈内动脉收缩期速度(ICSV)与颈内动脉远端收缩期速度(DICSV)之比在检测颈动脉狭窄中的价值。
211例患者纳入一项前瞻性研究,比较几种多普勒测量值与颈动脉血管造影结果。通过多普勒超声获得以下频谱测量值:ICSV/DICSV比值、ICSV、ICSV/颈总动脉收缩期速度(CCSV)比值以及颈内动脉(终末)舒张期速度(ICDV)。为两组绘制了受试者操作特征曲线:第一组为365条颈动脉,所有多普勒测量均成功获得;第二组为258条颈动脉的亚组,其ICSV为100cm/秒或更高。
在365条颈动脉组中,与ICDV相比,ICSV/DICSV比值改善了对60%或更高狭窄程度的检测(p = 0.03)。在ICSV为100cm/秒或更高的258条颈动脉中,与ICSV(分别为p = 0.006和0.023)、ICSV/CCSV(分别为p = 0.0013和0.003)以及ICDV(分别为p = 0.0015和0.020)相比,ICSV/DICSV比值在识别60%或更高以及70%或更高狭窄程度时与血管造影的相关性更好。
当ICSV为100cm/秒或更高时,使用ICSV/DICSV比值进行多普勒检测颈动脉狭窄具有优势。