Suppr超能文献

使用苯唑西林纸片筛选试验检测对青霉素和头孢曲松耐药的肺炎球菌。

Use of an oxacillin disk screening test for detection of penicillin- and ceftriaxone-resistant pneumococci.

作者信息

Jetté L P, Sinave C

机构信息

Laboratoire de Santé Publique du Québec, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Apr;37(4):1178-81. doi: 10.1128/JCM.37.4.1178-1181.1999.

Abstract

In a context of worldwide emergence of resistance among Streptococcus pneumoniae strains, early detection of strains with decreased susceptibility to beta-lactam antibiotics is important for clinicians. If the 1-microgram oxacillin disk diffusion test is used as described by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, no interpretation is available for strains showing zone sizes of </=19 mm, and there is presently no disk diffusion test available for screening cephalosporin resistance. The zones obtained by the diffusion method by using the 1-microgram oxacillin disk were compared with penicillin MICs for 1,116 clinical strains and with ceftriaxone MICs for 695 of these strains. Among the 342 strains with growth up to the 1-microgram oxacillin disk margin, none were susceptible (MIC, </=0.06 microgram/ml), 62 had intermediate resistance (MIC, 0.12 to 1.0 microgram/ml), and 280 were resistant (MIC, >/=2.0 microgram/ml) to penicillin. For ceftriaxone, among 98 strains with no zone of inhibition in response to oxacillin, 68 had intermediate resistance (MIC, 1.0 microgram/ml), and 22 were resistant (MIC, >/=2.0 microgram/ml). To optimize the use of the disk diffusion method, we propose that the absence of a zone of inhibition around the 1-microgram oxacillin disk be regarded as an indicator of nonsusceptibility to penicillin and ceftriaxone and recommend that such strains be reported as nonsusceptible to these antimicrobial agents, pending the results of a MIC quantitation method.

摘要

在肺炎链球菌菌株全球耐药性不断出现的背景下,早期检测对β-内酰胺类抗生素敏感性降低的菌株对临床医生而言很重要。如果按照美国国家临床实验室标准委员会的描述使用1微克苯唑西林纸片扩散试验,对于抑菌圈直径≤19毫米的菌株无法给出解释,并且目前尚无用于筛查头孢菌素耐药性的纸片扩散试验。将使用1微克苯唑西林纸片通过扩散法获得的抑菌圈直径与1116株临床菌株的青霉素最低抑菌浓度(MIC)以及其中695株菌株的头孢曲松MIC进行了比较。在抑菌圈直径达到1微克苯唑西林纸片边缘的342株菌株中,无对青霉素敏感的菌株(MIC≤0.06微克/毫升),62株有中介耐药性(MIC为0.12至1.0微克/毫升),280株对青霉素耐药(MIC≥2.0微克/毫升)。对于头孢曲松,在对苯唑西林无抑菌圈的98株菌株中,68株有中介耐药性(MIC为1.0微克/毫升),22株耐药(MIC≥2.0微克/毫升)。为优化纸片扩散法的使用,我们建议将1微克苯唑西林纸片周围无抑菌圈视为对青霉素和头孢曲松不敏感的指标,并建议在MIC定量方法结果出来之前,将此类菌株报告为对这些抗菌药物不敏感。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Streptococcus pneumoniae serogroup 6 clones over two decades.肺炎链球菌血清群 6 克隆超过 20 年。
Epidemiol Infect. 2014 Dec;142(12):2501-13. doi: 10.1017/S0950268814000508. Epub 2014 Mar 18.

本文引用的文献

9
Treatment of bacterial meningitis.细菌性脑膜炎的治疗。
N Engl J Med. 1997 Mar 6;336(10):708-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199703063361007.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验