Parsons D S, Harris D C
Department of Renal Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Pharmacoeconomics. 1997 Aug;12(2 Pt 1):140-60. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199712020-00005.
The quality of life of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has become an area of intensive investigation because of the high costs of renal-replacement therapy (dialysis or renal transplantation) and the rising prevalence of renal failure. Studies comparing quality of life of patients using different forms of renal-replacement therapy are flawed by deficiencies in study design, such as lack of randomisation. Nevertheless, in both retrospective and prospective studies, transplantation has been shown to offer the highest levels of functional ability, employment and subjective quality of life. After case-mix adjustment, there is little difference between peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis in terms of quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes. Vocational rehabilitation is an important aim of therapy; for patients below retirement age, pre-dialysis education and counselling are important in maintaining employment. The elderly comprise the fastest-growing group of dialysis recipients; multiple comorbidities add to functional impairment in these patients. Subjective quality of life remains surprisingly high in many elderly patients, despite poor objective quality of life. The quality of life of patients with diabetes mellitus and ESRD is lower than that of nondiabetic patients with ESRD. For selected patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, combined renal and pancreatic transplantation offers the advantage of freedom from insulin injections. Unfortunately, available evidence suggests only small improvements in quality of life with combined transplantation versus kidney-only transplantation, probably because many patients have developed multiple diabetic complications by the time of transplantation. Epoetin alfa (erythropoietin) has been shown to improve quality of life in a number of trials. The optimal target haematocrit is a subject of controversy, but on current evidence, a target of 34 to 37% is reasonable. The degree of improvement in quality of life must be balanced against the additional costs of achieving a higher haematocrit. Further study is necessary to clarify the optimal target haematocrit for epoetin alfa therapy, as well as the possible effects of nutritional support, growth hormone in paediatric patients, and combined renal and pancreatic transplantation in improving quality of life.
由于肾脏替代治疗(透析或肾移植)成本高昂且肾衰竭患病率不断上升,终末期肾病(ESRD)患者的生活质量已成为一个深入研究的领域。比较使用不同形式肾脏替代治疗的患者生活质量的研究存在研究设计缺陷,如缺乏随机分组。然而,在回顾性和前瞻性研究中,移植已被证明能提供最高水平的功能能力、就业机会和主观生活质量。在病例组合调整后,腹膜透析和血液透析在生活质量(QOL)结果方面几乎没有差异。职业康复是治疗的一个重要目标;对于退休年龄以下的患者,透析前教育和咨询对维持就业很重要。老年人是透析接受者中增长最快的群体;多种合并症加剧了这些患者的功能损害。尽管客观生活质量较差,但许多老年患者的主观生活质量仍然出奇地高。糖尿病合并ESRD患者的生活质量低于非糖尿病ESRD患者。对于选定的胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者,肾胰联合移植具有无需注射胰岛素的优势。不幸的是,现有证据表明,与单纯肾移植相比,联合移植在生活质量方面仅略有改善,可能是因为许多患者在移植时已出现多种糖尿病并发症。在多项试验中,促红细胞生成素α(红细胞生成素)已被证明能改善生活质量。最佳目标血细胞比容是一个有争议的话题,但根据目前的证据,目标值为34%至37%是合理的。生活质量的改善程度必须与达到更高血细胞比容的额外成本相平衡。有必要进一步研究以明确促红细胞生成素α治疗的最佳目标血细胞比容,以及营养支持、儿科患者生长激素和肾胰联合移植对改善生活质量的可能影响。