• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对患有严重行为问题的幼儿进行评估时的决策分析。

An analysis of choice making in the assessment of young children with severe behavior problems.

作者信息

Harding J W, Wacker D P, Berg W K, Cooper L J, Asmus J, Mlela K, Muller J

机构信息

University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Behav Anal. 1999 Spring;32(1):63-82. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-63.

DOI:10.1901/jaba.1999.32-63
PMID:10201104
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1284541/
Abstract

We examined how positive and negative reinforcement influenced time allocation, occurrence of problem behavior, and completion of parent instructions during a concurrent choice assessment with 2 preschool-aged children who displayed severe problem behavior in their homes. The children were given a series of concurrent choice options that varied availability of parent attention, access to preferred toys, and presentation of parent instructions. The results showed that both children consistently allocated their time to choice areas that included parent attention when no instructions were presented. When parent attention choice areas included the presentation of instructions, the children displayed differential patterns of behavior that appeared to be influenced by the presence or absence of preferred toys. The results extended previous applications of reinforcer assessment procedures by analyzing the relative influence of both positive and negative reinforcement within a concurrent-operants paradigm.

摘要

我们研究了正强化和负强化如何影响时间分配、问题行为的发生以及在对两名在家中表现出严重问题行为的学龄前儿童进行的同时选择评估期间父母指令的完成情况。给孩子们一系列同时进行的选择选项,这些选项在父母关注的可得性、获得喜爱玩具的机会以及父母指令的呈现方面有所不同。结果表明,在没有呈现指令时,两个孩子都始终将时间分配到包括父母关注的选择区域。当父母关注的选择区域包括指令的呈现时,孩子们表现出不同的行为模式,这些模式似乎受到喜爱玩具是否存在的影响。通过在同时操作范式中分析正强化和负强化的相对影响,这些结果扩展了强化物评估程序以前的应用。

相似文献

1
An analysis of choice making in the assessment of young children with severe behavior problems.对患有严重行为问题的幼儿进行评估时的决策分析。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1999 Spring;32(1):63-82. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-63.
2
Choice-making treatment of young children's severe behavior problems.针对幼儿严重行为问题的决策性治疗。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Fall;29(3):263-90. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-263.
3
Reinforcement magnitude and responding during treatment with differential reinforcement.强化幅度与差别强化治疗期间的反应
J Appl Behav Anal. 2002 Spring;35(1):29-48. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2002.35-29.
4
On the effectiveness of and preference for punishment and extinction components of function-based interventions.基于功能的干预措施中惩罚与消退成分的有效性及偏好性
J Appl Behav Anal. 2005 Spring;38(1):51-65. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2005.6-04.
5
Functional communication training with and without alternative reinforcement and punishment: an analysis of 58 applications.功能性沟通训练结合替代强化和惩罚与不结合替代强化和惩罚的效果:58 个应用案例分析。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2013 Dec;46(4):708-22. doi: 10.1002/jaba.76. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
6
The effects of differential negative reinforcement of other behavior and noncontingent escape on compliance.其他行为的差别性负强化及非偶然逃避对依从性的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2003 Fall;36(3):379-82. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2003.36-379.
7
Caregiver preference for reinforcement-based interventions for problem behavior maintained by positive reinforcement.照顾者对基于强化的干预措施的偏好,这些干预措施用于解决由正强化维持的问题行为。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2016 Jun;49(2):215-27. doi: 10.1002/jaba.286. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
8
An evaluation of the interaction between quality of attention and negative reinforcement with children who display escape-maintained problem behavior.评价注意力质量与负强化之间的相互作用与表现出逃避维持问题行为的儿童。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2009 Summer;42(2):343-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-343.
9
Relations between rate of negative reinforcement and the persistence of task completion.负强化率与任务完成持续性之间的关系。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2016 Mar;49(1):122-37. doi: 10.1002/jaba.252. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
10
A brief computer-based assessment of reinforcer dimensions affecting choice.基于计算机的对影响选择的强化物维度的简要评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2001 Spring;34(1):57-60. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-57.

引用本文的文献

1
Communication Modality Preference and the Social Validity of Functional Communication and Mand Training.沟通方式偏好与功能性沟通及指令训练的社会效度
J Dev Phys Disabil. 2025 Jun;37(3):411-428. doi: 10.1007/s10882-024-09956-6. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
2
Updated Recommendations for Reinforcement Schedule Thinning following Functional Communication Training.功能性沟通训练后强化程序细化的更新建议
Behav Anal Pract. 2023 Oct 11;17(1):87-106. doi: 10.1007/s40617-023-00863-4. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
An integrated model for guiding the selection of treatment components for problem behavior maintained by automatic reinforcement.一个用于指导选择由自动强化维持的问题行为治疗成分的综合模型。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2016 Sep;49(3):617-38. doi: 10.1002/jaba.303. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
4
Meta-analysis of studies incorporating the interests of young children with autism spectrum disorders into early intervention practices.将自闭症谱系障碍幼儿的需求纳入早期干预实践的研究的荟萃分析。
Autism Res Treat. 2012;2012:462531. doi: 10.1155/2012/462531. Epub 2012 May 14.
5
Toward effective and preferred programming: a case for the objective measurement of social validity with recipients of behavior-change programs.迈向有效且受欢迎的项目规划:行为改变项目接受者对社会效度进行客观测量的实例分析
Behav Anal Pract. 2010 Spring;3(1):13-21. doi: 10.1007/BF03391754.
6
Toward a behavioral analysis of joint attention.迈向联合注意的行为分析。
Behav Anal. 2004 Fall;27(2):197-207. doi: 10.1007/BF03393180.
7
Modification of perseverative responding that increased earnings but impeded skill acquisition in a job-skills training program.在一项职业技能培训计划中,增加收入但阻碍技能习得的坚持反应的改变。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2009 Fall;42(3):627-40. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-627.
8
Evaluation of Mand-Reinforcer Relations Following Long-Term Functional Communication Training.长期功能性沟通训练后对指令-强化物关系的评估
J Speech Lang Pathol Appl Behav Anal. 2008(2.4-3.1):25-35. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2008.-25.
9
Using telemedicine to conduct behavioral assessments.使用远程医疗进行行为评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2006 Fall;39(3):333-40. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2006.173-04.
10
On the relative contributions of noncontingent reinforcement and escape extinction in the treatment of food refusal.非偶然性强化和消退在食物拒绝治疗中的相对作用
J Appl Behav Anal. 2004 Spring;37(1):27-42. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2004.37-27.

本文引用的文献

1
Limited matching on concurrent-schedule reinforcement of academic behavior.有限制的同期日程强化学术行为匹配。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Winter;27(4):585-96. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-585.
2
Evaluation and long-term treatment of aberrant behavior displayed by young children with disabilities.残疾幼儿异常行为的评估与长期治疗。
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1998 Aug;19(4):260-6. doi: 10.1097/00004703-199808000-00004.
3
Basic and applied research on choice responding.关于选择反应的基础研究与应用研究。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Fall;30(3):387-410. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-387.
4
The use of positive and negative reinforcement in the treatment of escape-maintained destructive behavior.正负强化在逃避维持的破坏性行为治疗中的应用。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Summer;30(2):279-97; quiz 297-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-279.
5
Developing a technology for the use of operant extinction in clinical settings: an examination of basic and applied research.开发一种在临床环境中运用操作性消退的技术:基础研究与应用研究考察
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Fall;29(3):345-82; discussion 383-5. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-345.
6
Using a choice assessment to predict reinforcer effectiveness.使用选择评估来预测强化物的有效性。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Spring;29(1):1-9. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-1.
7
Choice-making treatment of young children's severe behavior problems.针对幼儿严重行为问题的决策性治疗。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Fall;29(3):263-90. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-263.
8
Analysis of free-time contingencies as positive versus negative reinforcement.将自由时间的意外事件分析为正强化与负强化。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Summer;29(2):247-50. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-247.
9
A comparison of reinforcer assessment methods: the utility of verbal and pictorial choice procedures.强化物评估方法的比较:言语和图片选择程序的效用。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Summer;29(2):201-12. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-201.
10
Impulsivity in students with serious emotional disturbance: the interactive effects of reinforcer rate, delay, and quality.患有严重情绪障碍的学生的冲动性:强化物频率、延迟和质量的交互作用。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1993 Spring;26(1):37-52. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1993.26-37.