Leitmeyer K C, Vaughn D W, Watts D M, Salas R, Villalobos I, Ramos C, Rico-Hesse R
Department of Virology and Immunology, Southwest Foundation for Biomedical Research, San Antonio, Texas 78227-5301, USA.
J Virol. 1999 Jun;73(6):4738-47. doi: 10.1128/JVI.73.6.4738-4747.1999.
The understanding of dengue virus pathogenesis has been hampered by the lack of in vitro and in vivo models of disease. The study of viral factors involved in the production of severe dengue, dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF), versus the more common dengue fever (DF), have been limited to indirect clinical and epidemiologic associations. In an effort to identify viral determinants of DHF, we have developed a method for comparing dengue type 2 genomes (reverse transcriptase PCR in six fragments) directly from patient plasma. Samples for comparison were selected from two previously described dengue type 2 genotypes which had been shown to be the cause of DF or DHF. When full genome sequences of 11 dengue viruses were analyzed, several structural differences were seen consistently between those associated with DF only and those with the potential to cause DHF: a total of six encoded amino acid charge differences were seen in the prM, E, NS4b, and NS5 genes, while sequence differences observed within the 5' nontranslated region (NTR) and 3' NTR were predicted to change RNA secondary structures. We hypothesize that the primary determinants of DHF reside in (i) amino acid 390 of the E protein, which purportedly alters virion binding to host cells; (ii) in the downstream loop (nucleotides 68 to 80) of the 5' NTR, which may be involved in translation initiation; and (iii) in the upstream 300 nucleotides of the 3' NTR, which may regulate viral replication via the formation of replicative intermediates. The significance of four amino acid differences in the nonstructural proteins NS4b and NS5, a presumed transport protein and the viral RNA polymerase, respectively, remains unknown. This new approach to the study of dengue virus genome differences should better reflect the true composition of viral RNA populations in the natural host and permit their association with pathogenesis.
由于缺乏疾病的体外和体内模型,对登革热病毒发病机制的理解受到了阻碍。对涉及严重登革热(登革出血热,DHF)与更常见的登革热(DF)产生的病毒因素的研究,一直局限于间接的临床和流行病学关联。为了确定DHF的病毒决定因素,我们开发了一种直接从患者血浆中比较2型登革热病毒基因组(六个片段的逆转录酶PCR)的方法。用于比较的样本选自由两种先前描述的2型登革热病毒基因型,它们已被证明是DF或DHF的病因。当分析11种登革热病毒的全基因组序列时,仅与DF相关的病毒和有导致DHF潜力的病毒之间始终存在一些结构差异:在prM、E、NS4b和NS5基因中总共发现了六个编码氨基酸电荷差异,而在5'非翻译区(NTR)和3' NTR内观察到的序列差异预计会改变RNA二级结构。我们假设DHF的主要决定因素存在于:(i)E蛋白的第390位氨基酸,据称它会改变病毒粒子与宿主细胞的结合;(ii)5' NTR的下游环(核苷酸68至80),它可能参与翻译起始;以及(iii)3' NTR的上游300个核苷酸,它可能通过形成复制中间体来调节病毒复制。非结构蛋白NS4b和NS5中四个氨基酸差异的意义仍然未知,NS4b推测是一种转运蛋白,NS5是病毒RNA聚合酶。这种研究登革热病毒基因组差异的新方法应该能更好地反映天然宿主中病毒RNA群体的真实组成,并使其与发病机制相关联。