Moon M R, Luchette F A, Gibson S W, Crews J, Sudarshan G, Hurst J M, Davis K, Johannigman J A, Frame S B, Fischer J E
Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Ohio, USA.
Ann Surg. 1999 May;229(5):684-91; discussion 691-2. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199905000-00011.
To evaluate systemic versus epidural opioid administration for analgesia in patients sustaining thoracic trauma.
The authors have previously shown that epidural analgesia significantly reduces the pain associated with significant chest wall injury. Recent studies report that epidural analgesia is associated with a lower catecholamine and cytokine response in patients undergoing elective thoracotomy compared with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). This study compares the effect of epidural analgesia and PCA on pain relief, pulmonary function, cathechol release, and immune response in patients sustaining significant thoracic trauma.
Patients (ages 18 to 60 years) sustaining thoracic injury were prospectively randomized to receive epidural analgesia or PCA during an 18-month period. Levels of serum interleukin (IL)-1beta, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) were measured every 12 hours for 3 days by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Urinary catecholamine levels were measured every 24 hours. Independent observers assessed pulmonary function using standard techniques and analgesia using a verbal rating score.
Twenty-four patients of the 34 enrolled completed the study. Age, injury severity score, thoracic abbreviated injury score, and length of hospital stay did not differ between the two groups. There was no significant difference in plasma levels of IL-1beta, IL-2, IL-6, or TNF-alpha or urinary catecholamines between the two groups at any time point. Epidural analgesia was associated with significantly reduced plasma levels of IL-8 at days 2 and 3, verbal rating score of pain on days 1 and 3, and maximal inspiratory force and tidal volume on day 3 versus PCA.
Epidural analgesia significantly reduced pain with chest wall excursion compared with PCA. The route of analgesia did not affect the catecholamine response. However, serum levels of IL-8, a proinflammatory chemoattractant that has been implicated in acute lung injury, were significantly reduced in patients receiving epidural analgesia on days 2 and 3. This may have important clinical implications because lower levels of IL-8 may reduce infectious or inflammatory complications in the trauma patient. Also, tidal volume and maximal inspiratory force were improved with epidural analgesia by day 3. These results demonstrate that epidural analgesia is superior to PCA in providing analgesia, improving pulmonary function, and modifying the immune response in patients with severe chest injury.
评估全身应用与硬膜外应用阿片类药物对胸部创伤患者的镇痛效果。
作者此前已表明,硬膜外镇痛可显著减轻与严重胸壁损伤相关的疼痛。近期研究报告称,与患者自控镇痛(PCA)相比,硬膜外镇痛与择期开胸手术患者较低的儿茶酚胺和细胞因子反应相关。本研究比较了硬膜外镇痛和PCA对严重胸部创伤患者疼痛缓解、肺功能、儿茶酚胺释放及免疫反应的影响。
前瞻性地将18至60岁的胸部损伤患者随机分组,在18个月的时间内接受硬膜外镇痛或PCA。通过酶联免疫吸附测定法,每12小时测量3天血清白细胞介素(IL)-1β、IL-2、IL-6、IL-8和肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)水平。每24小时测量尿儿茶酚胺水平。独立观察者使用标准技术评估肺功能,并使用语言评分法评估镇痛效果。
34名入组患者中有24名完成了研究。两组患者的年龄、损伤严重程度评分、胸部简明损伤评分及住院时间无差异。两组在任何时间点的血浆IL-1β、IL-2、IL-6或TNF-α水平或尿儿茶酚胺水平均无显著差异。与PCA相比,硬膜外镇痛在第2天和第3天与血浆IL-8水平显著降低、第1天和第3天的疼痛语言评分显著降低以及第3天的最大吸气力和潮气量显著降低相关。
与PCA相比,硬膜外镇痛可显著减轻胸壁活动时的疼痛。镇痛途径不影响儿茶酚胺反应。然而,在第2天和第3天接受硬膜外镇痛的患者中,促炎趋化因子IL-8的血清水平显著降低,IL-8与急性肺损伤有关。这可能具有重要的临床意义,因为较低水平的IL-8可能减少创伤患者的感染或炎症并发症。此外,到第3天,硬膜外镇痛改善了潮气量和最大吸气力。这些结果表明,在为严重胸部损伤患者提供镇痛、改善肺功能和调节免疫反应方面,硬膜外镇痛优于PCA。