• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牙髓材料的甲醛评估

Formaldehyde evaluation from endodontic materials.

作者信息

Cohen B I, Pagnillo M K, Musikant B L, Deutsch A S

出版信息

Oral Health. 1998 Dec;88(12):37-9.

PMID:10323136
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to measure the amount of formaldehyde released from three types of endodontic sealing cement (AH-Plus, EZ-Fill, and AH-26). Formaldehyde release was analyzed using High Performance Liquid Chromatography, which could detect as low as 0.25 ppm. The data was tabulated after two runs. The two paste system of AH-Plus endodontic sealing cement had the least amount of formaldehyde release (0.00039%, 3.9 ppm). This was followed by EZ-Fill (0.054%, 540 ppm) endodontic cement and AH-26 (0.1347%, 1347 ppm) endodontic cement which yielded the greatest formaldehyde release. Both of these cements (EZ-Fill and AH-26 endodontic filling cements) are based on a powder-liquid mix. The relative minute amounts of formaldehyde released by the endodontic cements studied (AH-Plus and EZ-Fill) warrant their use as endodontic sealing cements.

摘要

本研究的目的是测量三种类型的根管封闭剂(AH-Plus、EZ-Fill和AH-26)释放的甲醛量。使用高效液相色谱法分析甲醛释放量,该方法可检测低至0.25 ppm的甲醛。经过两次测试后将数据制成表格。AH-Plus根管封闭剂的双糊剂系统释放的甲醛量最少(0.00039%,3.9 ppm)。其次是EZ-Fill根管封闭剂(0.054%,540 ppm)和AH-26根管封闭剂(0.1347%,1347 ppm),后者释放的甲醛量最大。这两种封闭剂(EZ-Fill和AH-26根管充填剂)均基于粉液混合。所研究的根管封闭剂(AH-Plus和EZ-Fill)释放的相对微量甲醛证明它们可作为根管封闭剂使用。

相似文献

1
Formaldehyde evaluation from endodontic materials.牙髓材料的甲醛评估
Oral Health. 1998 Dec;88(12):37-9.
2
AH 26 releases formaldehyde.AH 26会释放甲醛。
J Endod. 1993 Dec;19(12):596-8. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80272-4.
3
Disintegration of endodontic cements in water.根管粘固剂在水中的崩解
J Endod. 1997 Jul;23(7):439-41. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80298-1.
4
Release of formaldehyde by 4 endodontic sealers.4种根管封闭剂甲醛释放情况
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999 Aug;88(2):221-5. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(99)70119-8.
5
A comparative evaluation of sealing ability of rootcanal sealers.根管封闭剂封闭能力的比较评估
Indian J Dent Res. 2002 Jan-Mar;13(1):31-6.
6
Formaldehyde release from ground root canal sealer in vitro.
J Endod. 2001 Jun;27(6):396-7. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200106000-00006.
7
Changes of pH produced by immersion of endodontic sealers.根管封闭剂浸泡所产生的pH值变化
Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2002;15(1-2):15-9.
8
An in vitro study of the cytotoxicity of two root canal sealers.
J Endod. 2000 Apr;26(4):228-9. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200004000-00008.
9
Evaluation of Er:YAG laser and EDTAC on dentin adhesion of six endodontic sealers.铒钇铝石榴石激光和乙二胺四乙酸对六种根管封闭剂牙本质黏附性的评估。
Braz Dent J. 2001;12(1):27-30.
10
pH measurement of root canal sealers.根管封闭剂的pH值测量
J Endod. 1998 Apr;24(4):236-8. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80103-9.

引用本文的文献

1
In Vitro Antimicrobial Effects of Endoseal MTA and AH Plus Sealers on and Mature Biofilms.Endoseal MTA和AH Plus封闭剂对早期和成熟生物膜的体外抗菌作用
Front Dent. 2025 May 19;22:19. doi: 10.18502/fid.v22i19.18760. eCollection 2025.
2
Evaluation of cytotoxicity and anti-inflammatory action of AH-Plus sealer with and without petasin, pachymic acid, curcumin & shilajit: an invitro-study.含与不含蜂斗菜素、茯苓酸、姜黄素及希拉季特的AH-Plus封闭剂的细胞毒性和抗炎作用评估:一项体外研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 8;15(1):24413. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08761-1.
3
Influence of sonic activation of epoxy-resin and calcium silicate sealer on postoperative pain: a patient-blinded, parallel group, randomized clinical trial.
声处理对环氧树脂和硅酸钙水门汀的影响:一项盲法、平行组、随机临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Oct 23;24(1):1268. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05049-0.
4
Cytotoxicity and cell migration evaluation of a strontium silicate-based root canal sealer on stem cells from rat apical papilla: an in vitro study.锶硅酸钠基根管封闭剂对大鼠根尖乳头干细胞细胞毒性和迁移能力的体外评估。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Aug 30;24(1):1023. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04774-w.
5
Oxidative damage analysis and cell viability of Drosophila melanogaster exposed to three different endodontic sealers: an in vivo and ex vivo study.体内和体外研究:三种不同根管封闭剂处理下黑腹果蝇的氧化损伤分析和细胞活力。
Odontology. 2024 Oct;112(4):1178-1185. doi: 10.1007/s10266-024-00925-1. Epub 2024 Mar 17.
6
In Vitro Cytotoxicity and Mineralization Potential of an Endodontic Bioceramic Material.一种牙髓生物陶瓷材料的体外细胞毒性和矿化潜力
Eur J Dent. 2023 May;17(2):548-555. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1750778. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
7
Design, Evaluation And Antimicrobial Activity Of Egyptian Propolis-Loaded Nanoparticles: Intrinsic Role As A Novel And Naturally Based Root Canal Nanosealer.埃及蜂胶负载纳米粒子的设计、评价及抗菌活性:作为一种新型天然根管纳米封闭剂的固有作用。
Int J Nanomedicine. 2019 Oct 21;14:8379-8398. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S219577. eCollection 2019.
8
Antibacterial Additives in Epoxy Resin-Based Root Canal Sealers: A Focused Review.基于环氧树脂的根管封闭剂中的抗菌添加剂:聚焦综述
Dent J (Basel). 2019 Jul 1;7(3):72. doi: 10.3390/dj7030072.
9
Contact Sensitization to Formaldehyde in Veterinary Medicine - An Unexplored Field in Occupational Health.兽医学中对甲醛的接触致敏——职业健康领域一个未被探索的领域
Indian J Occup Environ Med. 2019 Jan-Apr;23(1):37-41. doi: 10.4103/ijoem.IJOEM_156_18.
10
Cytotoxicity of Different Concentrations of Three Root Canal Sealers on Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells.三种根管封闭剂不同浓度对人骨髓间充质干细胞的细胞毒性。
Biomolecules. 2018 Aug 1;8(3):68. doi: 10.3390/biom8030068.