Grant T, Bennett-Wood V, Robins-Browne R M
Microbiological Research Unit, Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Royal Children's Hospital, and Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia.
Infect Immun. 1999 Sep;67(9):4367-75. doi: 10.1128/IAI.67.9.4367-4375.1999.
Yersinia enterocolitica strains of biotype 1A are increasingly being recognized as etiological agents of gastroenteritis. However, the mechanisms by which these bacteria cause disease differ from those of highly invasive, virulence plasmid-bearing Y. enterocolitica strains and are poorly understood. We have investigated several biotype 1A strains of diverse origin for their ability to resist killing by professional phagocytes. All strains were rapidly killed by polymorphonuclear leukocytes but persisted within macrophages (activated with gamma interferon) to a significantly greater extent (survival = 40.5% +/- 17.4%) than did Escherichia coli HB101 (9.3% +/- 0.7%; P = 0.0001). Strains isolated from symptomatic patients were significantly more resistant to killing by macrophages (survival = 48.9% +/- 19.5%) than were strains obtained from food or the environment (survival = 32.1% +/- 10.3%; P = 0.04). Some strains which had been ingested by macrophages or HEp-2 epithelial cells showed a tendency to reemerge into the tissue culture medium over a period lasting several hours. This phenomenon, which we termed "escape," was observed in 14 of 15 strains of clinical origin but in only 3 of 12 nonclinical isolates (P = 0.001). The capacity of bacteria to escape from cells was not directly related to their invasive ability. To determine if escape was due to host cell lysis, we used a variety of techniques, including lactate dehydrogenase release, trypan blue exclusion, and examination of infected cells by light and electron microscopy, to measure cell viability and lysis. These studies established that biotype 1A Y. enterocolitica strains were able to escape from macrophages or epithelial cells without causing detectable cytolysis, suggesting that escape was achieved by a process resembling exocytosis. The observations that biotype 1A Y. enterocolitica strains of clinical origin are significantly more resistant to killing by macrophages and significantly more likely to escape from host cells than are strains of nonclinical origin suggest that these properties may account for the virulence of these bacteria.
生物型1A的小肠结肠炎耶尔森菌菌株越来越被认为是肠胃炎的病原体。然而,这些细菌致病的机制与具有高侵袭性、携带毒力质粒的小肠结肠炎耶尔森菌菌株不同,并且人们对此了解甚少。我们研究了几种不同来源的生物型1A菌株抵抗专业吞噬细胞杀伤的能力。所有菌株都能被多形核白细胞迅速杀灭,但在巨噬细胞(用γ干扰素激活)内存活的时间显著长于大肠杆菌HB101(存活 = 40.5% +/- 17.4%,而大肠杆菌HB101为9.3% +/- 7%;P = 0.0001)。从有症状患者分离出的菌株对巨噬细胞杀伤的抵抗力显著高于从食物或环境中获得的菌株(存活 = 48.9% +/- 19.5%,而从食物或环境中获得的菌株存活 = 32.1% +/- 10.3%;P = 0.04)。一些被巨噬细胞或HEp - 2上皮细胞摄取的菌株在长达数小时的时间里有重新出现在组织培养基中的趋势。我们将这种现象称为“逃逸”,在15株临床来源的菌株中有14株观察到这种现象,而在12株非临床分离株中只有3株观察到(P = 0.001)。细菌从细胞中逃逸的能力与其侵袭能力没有直接关系。为了确定逃逸是否是由于宿主细胞裂解,我们使用了多种技术,包括乳酸脱氢酶释放、台盼蓝排斥以及通过光学和电子显微镜检查感染细胞,以测量细胞活力和裂解情况。这些研究表明,生物型1A小肠结肠炎耶尔森菌菌株能够从巨噬细胞或上皮细胞中逃逸而不引起可检测到的细胞溶解,这表明逃逸是通过类似于胞吐作用的过程实现的。临床来源的生物型1A小肠结肠炎耶尔森菌菌株比非临床来源的菌株对巨噬细胞杀伤的抵抗力显著更强且从宿主细胞中逃逸的可能性显著更高,这些观察结果表明这些特性可能解释了这些细菌的毒力。