Walters S J, Morrell C J, Dixon S
Sheffield Health Economics Group, School of Health & Related Research, University of Sheffield.
Qual Life Res. 1999 Jun;8(4):327-36. doi: 10.1023/a:1008992006845.
The effect on quality of life by healing leg ulcers is not known and no validated disease-specific tool is available for measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for people with venous leg ulcers. The objective of this paper was to compare four generic instruments [MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36); EuroQol (EQ); McGill Short Form Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) and the Frenchay Activities Index (FAI)] used for measuring HRQoL in people with venous leg ulcers, and to offer guidance on the most appropriate tool for researchers.
Two hundred and thirty-three patients with venous leg ulcers were recruited as part of a randomised controlled trial of the cost-effectiveness of community leg ulcer clinics. Subjects completed questionnaires containing the four instruments on three occasions (initial assessment, 3 and 12 months). The discriminative and evaluative properties of the four instruments were compared.
All four instruments were acceptable to patients, taking a mean of 19.3 (SD 6.3) min to complete. At initial assessment, the SF-MPQ had poorer discriminative properties than the other three instruments and was not able to distinguish between the different patient groups in relation to age and ulcer duration. The FAI was good at discriminating between the different patient groups (at initial assessment) in relation to age, mobility and ulcer size. At the three-month follow-up, the SF-MPQ was more responsive than the other measures and detected changes in HRQoL, whereas the EQ and SF-36 did not. At 12 months, the SF-MPQ still identified differences and the SF-36 and EQ also did at this stage.
In the absence of a validated condition-specific tool for measuring changes in general health status for patients with venous leg ulcers, we make the following recommendations. For evaluating the outcome of interventions with a short-term follow-up (three months) in a clinical study we recommend the SF-MPQ and for 12-month follow-up in a clinical study the SF-36, with or without the SF-MPQ.
治愈腿部溃疡对生活质量的影响尚不清楚,且没有经过验证的针对特定疾病的工具可用于测量下肢静脉溃疡患者的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)。本文的目的是比较四种通用工具[医学结局研究36项简短健康调查(SF - 36);欧洲五维度健康量表(EQ);麦吉尔疼痛问卷简表(SF - MPQ)和法国ay活动指数(FAI)]在测量下肢静脉溃疡患者HRQoL方面的情况,并为研究人员提供最合适工具的指导。
作为社区腿部溃疡诊所成本效益随机对照试验的一部分,招募了233名下肢静脉溃疡患者。受试者在三个时间点(初始评估、3个月和12个月)完成了包含这四种工具的问卷。比较了这四种工具的区分性和评估性特征。
所有四种工具患者均可接受,完成平均用时19.3(标准差6.3)分钟。在初始评估时,SF - MPQ的区分性特征比其他三种工具差,无法区分不同年龄和溃疡持续时间的患者组。FAI在区分不同年龄、活动能力和溃疡大小的患者组(初始评估时)方面表现良好。在三个月随访时,SF - MPQ比其他测量方法更具反应性,能检测到HRQoL的变化,而EQ和SF - 36则不能。在12个月时,SF - MPQ仍能识别差异,SF - 36和EQ在此阶段也能识别。
由于缺乏经过验证的用于测量下肢静脉溃疡患者总体健康状况变化的特定疾病工具,我们提出以下建议。在临床研究中进行短期随访(三个月)以评估干预效果时,我们推荐使用SF - MPQ;在临床研究中进行12个月随访时,推荐使用SF - 36,可搭配或不搭配SF - MPQ。