Wolf R, Ruocco V
Department of Dermatology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Ichilov Hospital, Israel.
Adv Exp Med Biol. 1999;455:221-5. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-4857-7_32.
There are conflicting reports in the literature concerning the use of antimalarials in psoriatic patients with arthropathy or coexisting systemic lupus erythematosus. On the basis of a review of 18 publications in English, it was estimated that up to 18% of patients with psoriasis would develop an exacerbation of their disease following antimalarial therapy. In contrast to lithium and beta-blockers, antimalarials do not induce psoriasis de novo, but they only trigger already existing psoriasis, via a pharmacologic mechanism, probably due to an alteration of the activity of enzymes involved in the epidermal proliferation process. The chemical structure of the antimalarials is very similar to dansylputrescine, a potent transglutaminase (TGase) inhibitor. We suggested therefore that antimalarials trigger psoriasis through the modulation of the TGase activity. To verify this hypothesis, we examined the effect of hydroxychoroquine sulphate (HCQS) on cultured human skin and on TGase activity in vitro. Significant changes of epidermal morphology were seen in all explants cultured in the presence of HCQS. HCQS showed a concentration-dependent inhibition of TGase activity. We suggest that HCQS caused an initial break in the barrier function of the epidermis by inhibiting TGase activity; this was followed by a physiologic response of the epidermis aimed at barrier restoration. This rather non-specific stimulus to epidermal proliferation is probably sufficient to trigger psoriasis in predisposed individuals. Drug eruption is an age-old but timeless and fascinating subject. Of particular interest are those drug eruptions that may mimic idiopathic skin diseases. Apart from their obvious practical importance they are also of theoretical interest, because they provide an opportunity to investigate possible pathogenic mechanisms of the mimicked disease. In this paper, I would like to review briefly the characteristics of drug-induced psoriasis, and then propose a hypothesis concerning the pathogenesis of this phenomenon. In all, we found 258 reported cases of drug-induced psoriasis [1]. The drugs mainly involved are the antimalarials, lithium, beta blockers, and a large group of miscellaneous drugs. Three out of the four groups of drugs (lithium, beta blockers and miscellaneous drugs) can both induce or trigger psoriasis with almost equal frequency, namely they induce psoriasis de novo or they exacerbate an already existing psoriasis in 30-50% of the reported cases. Only one group of drugs, the antimalarials is an exception. In contrast to lithium and beta blockers, antimalarials do not induce psoriasis de novo, but only trigger already existing psoriasis. There are only three reported cases of psoriasis induced by antimalarials in patients who did not have the disease previously. Of these three patients, one had a seronegative arthritis and a family history of psoriasis, and, as stated by the author, there is evidence that the patient had pre-existing latent psoriasis. We believe that the other two cases may also have had latent psoriasis. That antimalarial drugs only trigger latent psoriasis and do not induce psoriasis de novo can be suspected from the fact that psoriasis cleared up completely after withdrawal of the drug in only 30% of patients on antimalarials, as compared with more than 60% of those receiving lithium and nearly 50% of those receiving beta blockers. This is probably also why the incubation period of the cases induced by antimalarial drugs is much shorter than that of lithium and beta blockers. Possibly, in triggered psoriasis (as in antimalarials) the drug only sets off with a chain of pathologic events previously programmed and ready to be set off, whereas in true drug-induced cases (as in some cases of lithium and betablockers) the drug is supposed to cause more profound changes and, therefore, more time is needed for these changes to occur.
关于在患有银屑病关节炎或并存系统性红斑狼疮的银屑病患者中使用抗疟药,文献中有相互矛盾的报道。基于对18篇英文出版物的综述,据估计高达18%的银屑病患者在接受抗疟药治疗后病情会加重。与锂盐和β受体阻滞剂不同,抗疟药不会新发银屑病,而是通过一种药理机制,可能是由于参与表皮增殖过程的酶活性改变,仅诱发已存在的银屑病。抗疟药的化学结构与强力转谷氨酰胺酶(TGase)抑制剂丹磺酰腐胺非常相似。因此我们推测抗疟药通过调节TGase活性来诱发银屑病。为验证这一假设,我们在体外研究了硫酸羟氯喹(HCQS)对培养的人皮肤和TGase活性的影响。在HCQS存在下培养的所有外植体中均观察到表皮形态的显著变化。HCQS对TGase活性呈浓度依赖性抑制。我们认为HCQS通过抑制TGase活性导致表皮屏障功能的初始破坏;随后是表皮旨在恢复屏障的生理反应。这种对表皮增殖的相当非特异性刺激可能足以在易感个体中诱发银屑病。药疹是一个古老但永不过时且引人入胜的话题。特别令人感兴趣的是那些可能模仿特发性皮肤病的药疹。除了它们明显的实际重要性外,它们在理论上也很有趣,因为它们提供了一个研究被模仿疾病可能的致病机制的机会。在本文中,我想简要回顾药物性银屑病的特征,然后提出一个关于这一现象发病机制的假设。我们总共发现了258例药物性银屑病的报道病例[1]。主要涉及的药物有抗疟药、锂盐、β受体阻滞剂以及一大类其他药物。四组药物中的三组(锂盐、β受体阻滞剂和其他药物)诱发或触发银屑病的频率几乎相同,即在30% - 50%的报道病例中它们新发银屑病或加重已存在的银屑病。只有一组药物,即抗疟药是个例外。与锂盐和β受体阻滞剂不同,抗疟药不会新发银屑病,而仅诱发已存在的银屑病。在之前没有银屑病的患者中,仅有3例抗疟药诱发银屑病的报道病例。在这3例患者中,1例患有血清阴性关节炎且有银屑病家族史,并且如作者所述,有证据表明该患者之前存在潜伏性银屑病。我们认为另外2例也可能有潜伏性银屑病。抗疟药仅诱发潜伏性银屑病而不新发银屑病这一点可以从以下事实推测出来:与接受锂盐治疗的患者中超过60%以及接受β受体阻滞剂治疗的患者中近50%相比,仅30%接受抗疟药治疗患者在停药后银屑病完全消退。这可能也是为什么抗疟药诱发病例的潜伏期比锂盐和β受体阻滞剂诱发病例的潜伏期短得多的原因。可能,在诱发的银屑病(如抗疟药所致)中,药物只是引发一系列先前已编程且准备好被触发的病理事件,而在真正的药物诱发病例(如锂盐和β受体阻滞剂的某些病例)中,药物被认为会引起更深刻的变化,因此这些变化发生需要更多时间。